By knowing the natural abundance of minor isotopes, it's possible to calculate the relative heights of M* and M+1 peaks. If natural abundances are 12C - 98.9% and 13C - 1.10%, what are the relative heights, to the nearest 0.1%, of the M* and M+1 peaks in the mass spectrum of lactic acid, C3H,03? Ignore the contributions of isotopes like ²H (deuterium; 0.015% natural abundance) and 17o (0.04% natural abundance) that are small. The relative heights are, in order of increasing mass: 100 to

icon
Related questions
Question
100%
By knowing the natural abundance of minor isotopes, it's possible to calculate the relative heights of M* and M+1 peaks. If natural abundances are 12C - 98.9% and 13C - 1.10%,
what are the relative heights, to the nearest 0.1%, of the M* and M+1 peaks in the mass spectrum of lactic acid, C3H,03?
Ignore the contributions of isotopes like 2H (deuterium; 0.015% natural abundance) and 'o (0.04% natural abundance) that are small.
The relative heights are, in order of increasing mass: 100 to
Transcribed Image Text:By knowing the natural abundance of minor isotopes, it's possible to calculate the relative heights of M* and M+1 peaks. If natural abundances are 12C - 98.9% and 13C - 1.10%, what are the relative heights, to the nearest 0.1%, of the M* and M+1 peaks in the mass spectrum of lactic acid, C3H,03? Ignore the contributions of isotopes like 2H (deuterium; 0.015% natural abundance) and 'o (0.04% natural abundance) that are small. The relative heights are, in order of increasing mass: 100 to
Expert Solution
trending now

Trending now

This is a popular solution!

steps

Step by step

Solved in 2 steps

Blurred answer
Knowledge Booster
Combustion Analysis
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, chemistry and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.