Consideration can be defined as “something of value in the eyes of the law”, but consideration is not a critical factor to any contractual obligations and as such, it has to be ignored in any contract. Critically discuss this statement, with the following requirements. Five (5) applicable caribbean case laws on the subject matter. State clearly The issue Basic facts of the Cases The Judgement

Consideration can be defined as “something of value in the eyes of the law”, but consideration is not a critical factor to any contractual obligations and as such, it has to be ignored in any contract. Critically discuss this statement, with the following requirements. Five (5) applicable caribbean case laws on the subject matter. State clearly The issue Basic facts of the Cases The Judgement

Similar questions

You be the Arbitrator Paragraph 1 (1) Minimum Wage The Law on the Posting of Workers extends certain collective agreements to employers established outside Germany and to their workers posted to Germany. That provision is worded as follows: The legal rules resulting from a collective agreement governing the construction industry which is declared to be universally applicable ..., which relate to minimum pay, including pay for overtime ... shall also apply ... to an employment relationship linking an employer established outside Germany and his employee working within the territory covered by that collective agreement. ... [T]he collective agreement on the minimum wage provides that the minimum wage consists of the hourly pay provided for by that agreement and the bonus granted to workers in the construction industry, which together make up the total hourly pay under the agreement. ... [A]llowances and supplements paid by an employer, with the exception of the general bonus granted to…
Select the statement that describes how bilateral and unilateral contracts are alike and different. Both contract types involve two parties. But in bilateral contracts, both parties make a promise; in unilateral contracts, only one party does. Both are valid contract classifications, but only bilateral contracts involve two parties. Both are valid contract classifications, but only unilateral contracts involve two parties. Both contract classifications involve two promises, but only bilateral contracts involve two parties.
16. Why are restrictive covenant clauses controversial? They are controversial because they allow people to create contract terms that restrict their future right to alter those same contracts They are controversial because they allow people to create contract terms below the otherwise legislated minimum standards of work They are controversial because they seem to pit two legitimate interest against each other: the right of trade against the right of contract
Sector-based regimes are legal systems that cover a certain type of environment, such air, water, or land. Choose one: True or False
In this chapter, we stated that the doctrine of stare decisis "became a cornerstone of the English and American judicial systems." What does stare decisis mean, and why has this doctrine been so fundamental to the development of our legal tradition? Also, what is the name commonly given to our legal tradition, as inherited from the English system?
Requirements that are needed for another country and foreign enforceable contract in protecting business interests
Economics - business law.
What is the main difference between contracts discharged due to operation of law and contracts discharged due to acts of the parties? Discharge due to acts of the parties never requires court intervention, whereas discharge due to operation of law always does. Discharge due to operation of law reflects at least one party's intent, whereas discharge due to acts of the parties doesn't necessarily reflect either party's intent. Discharge due to acts of the parties is legally binding, whereas discharge due to operation of law is not. Discharge due to operation of law doesn't necessarily reflect either party's intent, whereas discharge due to acts of the parties reflects at least one party's intent. 11 XIR Submit > 17
A manager from a developing country is in charge of a multinational's operations in a country plagued by drug trafficking and lawlessness. A representative of a local "big man" approaches the manager one day and requests a "donation" to assist the big man in providing housing for the underprivileged. The envoy informs the manager that the large man will ensure that the manager has a productive stay in his country in exchange for the donation. There are no threats, but the manager is well aware that the huge man is the leader of a criminal organisation involved in drug trafficking. He also understands that the large man does actually support the underprivileged in his birthplace's decrepit neighbourhood. What exactly should the MANAGER do
Choose a company that operates within the Caribbean Region and apply the concept ofpsychological contracts to that company, by discussing its main features and how they develop.Discuss how employees’ psychological contracts might be violated and the consequences of theseviolations for employers.
Do you agree or disagree with the discussion below? What is your reaction? Any additional thought? Goodward, a newly hired newspaper reporter for The Cape Cod News, learned that the local cranberry growers had made an agreement under which they pooled their cranberry crops each year and sold them at what they determined to be a fair price. Goodward believes that such an agreement is in restraint of trade and a violation of the antitrust laws. Is he correct? I would say yes, and this is because according to Twomey the antitrust law will step in when competitors create a barrier to market entry or collude on prices or production to control prices. Antitrust It is designed to prevent unfair practices that reduce competition, such as price fixing. These laws are crucial for maintaining a competitive marketplace and protecting consumers from unfair pricing. Since the local cranberry growers had made an agreement under which they pooled their cranberry crops each year and sold them at…
Does the concept of judicial interpretation of the law mean that judges can make whatever law they wish? And, how can courts remain flexible, if they are required to follow precedent?