Bramwell Industries produces joint products C and D from Material X in a single operation. 500 gallons of Material X, costing $1,200, produce 300 gallons of Product C, selling for $2.00 per gallon, and 200 gallons of Product D, selling for $4.00 per gallon. The portion of the $1,200 cost that should be allocated to Product C using the value basis of allocation is____.

Bramwell Industries produces joint products C and D from Material X in a single operation. 500 gallons of Material X, costing $1,200, produce 300 gallons of Product C, selling for $2.00 per gallon, and 200 gallons of Product D, selling for $4.00 per gallon. The portion of the $1,200 cost that should be allocated to Product C using the value basis of allocation is____.

Managerial Accounting

15th Edition

ISBN:9781337912020

Author:Carl Warren, Ph.d. Cma William B. Tayler

Publisher:Carl Warren, Ph.d. Cma William B. Tayler

Chapter5: Support Department And Joint Cost Allocation

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 4CMA: Tucariz Company processes Duo into two joint products, Big and Mini. Duo is purchased in...

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Chemical Corporation produces liquid chemicals A and B from a joint process. Joint costs are allocated on the basis of relative sales value at split-off. It costs $4,560 to process 500 gallons of Product A and 1,000 gallons of Product B to the split-off point. The market value at split-off is $10 per gallon for Product A and $14 for Product B. Product B requires an additional process beyond split-off at a cost of $2 per gallon before it can be sold. What is Chemical's cost to produce 1,000 gallons of Product B? Choose... Choose... $4,860 $5,360 $3,360 $5,040
Corey Corporation manufactures joint products W and X. During a recent period, joint costs amounted to $450,000 in the production of 20,000 gallons of W and 50,000 gallons of X. Both products will be processed beyond the split-off point, giving rise to the following data: Separable processing costs Sales price (per gallon) if processed beyond split-off The joint cost allocated to W under the net-realizable-value method would be: (Do not round intermediate calculations.) Multiple Choice $156,000. $142,105, $110,000 $128.571. $40,000 $ 15 $ $160,000 13
Calcion Industries produces two joint products, Y and Z. Prior to the split-off point, the company incurred costs of $24,000. Product Y weighs 20 pounds and product Z weighs 80 pounds. Product Y sells for $150 per pound and product Z sells for $125 per pound. Based on a physical measure of output, allocate joint costs to products Y and Z. Product Y allocation ? Product Z allocation ?
Joint Products Arkansas Corporation manufactures liquid chemicals A and B from a joint process. It allocates joint costs on the basis of sales value at split-off. Processing 5,000 gallons of productA and 1,000 gallons of product B to the split-off point costs $5,600. The sales value at split-off is $2per gallon for product A and $30 per gallon for product B. Product B requires additional separableprocessing beyond the split-off point at a cost of $2.50 per gallon before it can be sold at a price of$34 per gallon.Required What is the company’s cost to produce 1,000 gallons of product B?
Milo Manufacturing produces products Kappa and Lambda from a joint process. Total joint costs are $168,000. The sales value at split-off was $174,960 for 8,400 units of Kappa and $63,280 for 12,600 units of Lambda. Required: What joint costs are allocated to the two products using the net realizable value at split-off approach? Note: Do not round intermediate calculations. Round your final answers to the nearest whole dollar amounts. What joint costs are allocated to the two products using the physical quantities method? Note: Do not round intermediate calculations. Kappa Lambda a. Net realizable value method ??? ??? b. Physical quantities method ??? ???
Milo Manufacturing produces products Kappa and Lambda from a joint process. Total joint costs are $158,000. The sales value at split-off was $167,760 for 4,400 units of Kappa and $63,280 for 6,600 units of Lambda. Required: What joint costs are allocated to the two products using the net realizable value at split-off approach? Note: Do not round intermediate calculations. Round your final answers to the nearest whole dollar amounts. What joint costs are allocated to the two products using the physical quantities method? Note: Do not round intermediate calculations.
Bixel Components manufactures products A1 and A2 from a joint process. Total joint costs are $360,000. The sales value at split-off was $400,000 for 4,500 units of product A1 and $200,000 for 1,400 units of product A2. Required: Assuming that total joint costs are allocated using the net realizable value at split-off approach, what amount of the joint costs was allocated to product A1? (Do not round intermediate calculations.) Joint cost of product A1
Milo Manufacturing produces products Kappa and Lambda from a joint process. Total joint costs are $169,000. The sales value at split- off was $175,680 for 8.800 units of Kappa and $63,280 for 13,200 units of Lambda. Required: a. What joint costs are allocated to the two products using the net realizable value at split-off approach? Note: Do not round intermediate calculations. Round your final answers to the nearest whole dollar amounts. b. What joint costs are allocated to the two products using the physical quantities method? Note: Do not round intermediate calculations. a. Net realizable value method b. Physical quantities method Kappa Lambda
The Freed Company produces three products, X, Y, Z, from a single raw material input. Product Y can be sold at the split-off point for total revenues of $50,000, or it can be processed further at a total cost of $16,000 and then sold for $68,000. Product Y: А. Should be sold at the split-off point, rather than processed further. В. Would increase the company's overall net operating income by $18,000 if processed further and then sold. С. Would increase the company's overall net operating income by $68,000 if processed further and then sold. D. Would increase the company's overall net operating income by $2,000 if processed further and then sold. Е. None of the above
Use the following information to answer questions 7 through 9: A joint production process that cost $240,000 generated two main products. P1 has 15,000 units and can be sold at the split-off point for $300,000. P2 has 25,000 units and can be sold at the split-off point for $200,000. A by-product can be sold for $30,000. a. $120,000 7. Using the net realizable value method, how much of the joint costs would be allocated to P1? b. $144,000 c. $156,000 d. $183,000 8. Using the physical quantities method, how much of the joint costs would be allocated to P1? a. $90,000 b. $120,000 c. $150,000 d. $180,000 9. If the sale value of the by-product is deducted from the joint costs of the main products, how much is Pl's share of the total costs? a. $126,000 b. $216,000 C $105,000 d. $184,000 10. The relevant data for deciding whether to process further are: Additional revenue after further processing. b. Joint costs. Additional costs of processing further. d. Both a, and c 11. Which of the…
Sunland uses DM of $48,000 and incurs DL and MOH costs of $61,000 and $28,000, respectively, in a single process that results in two main products, Tex and Mex. Product Tex, which has an immediate sales value of $92,000, is further processed at a cost of $43,000 in order to increase its sales value to $150,000. How much are Sunland's joint costs, and to which products will they be assigned? How much are Sunland's separable costs, and to which products will they be assigned? Total joint costs Total separable costs $ Costs Assigned to
Alphabet Soup Inc jointly produces A, B, and C at a joint cost of $100,000. The company uses the production method for byproducts and has estimated that B is a byproduct of manufacturing A and C with an estimated NRV of $6,000. The estimated NRVS of A and C are $80,000 and $80,000, respectively. If Alphabet Soup uses the NRV method in allocating joint costs, what will the cost allocation be? Select one: O a. $49,000 to A, $2,000 to B, and $49,000 to C. O b. $48,000 to A, $2,000 to B, and $48,000 to C. O c. $47,000 to A, $0 to B, and $47,000 to C. O d. $50,000 to A, $0 to B, and $50,000 to C. cross out cross out cross out cross out