Because elderly people may have difficulty standing to have their height measured, a study looked at the relationship between overallheight and height to the knee. Here are data (in centimeters) for five elderly men:Knee Height I57 45.2 43.8 47.2 57.5192.3 152.2 145.7 163.2 173.2Height yWhat is the equation of the least-squares regression line for predicting height from knee height?ANSWER: y%3D

Given data: x y 57 192.3 45.2 152.2 43.8 145.7 47.2 163.2 57.5 173.2

Answered: Because elderly people may have…

MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications

6th Edition

ISBN:9781119256830

Author:Amos Gilat

Publisher:Amos Gilat

Chapter1: Starting With Matlab

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1P

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Listed below are the overhead widths (cm) of seals measured from photographs and the weights (kg) of the seals. Overhead width 7.2 7.4 9.8 9.4 8.8 8.4 Weight 116 154 245 202 200 191 The four pairs of values below were obtained from the regression equation. Which is an extrapolation? a) overhead width 7.5 cm, weight 144 kg b) overhead width 10 cm, weight 245 kg c) overhead width 7.2 cm, weight 132 kg d) overhead width 8.1 cm, weight 169 kg
Listed below are foot lengths (mm) and heights (mm) of males. Find the regression equation, letting foot length be the predictor (x) variable. Find the best predicted height of a male with a foot length of 272.8 mm. How does the result compare to the actual height of 1776 mm? Foot Length 281.8 277.9 253.3 259.2 279.0 258.0 274.0 262.4 Height 1784.7 1771.2 1676.0 1645.9 1858.9 1710.1 1788.9 1737.0 The regression equation is y=enter your response here+enter your response herex. (Round the y-intercept to the nearest integer as needed. Round the slope to two decimal places as needed.) The best predicted height of a male with a foot length of 272.8 mm is enter your response heremm. (Round to the nearest integer as needed.)
19. You might think that increasing the resources available would elevate the number of plant spe- cies that an area could support, but the evidence suggests otherwise. The data in the accompany- ing table are from the Park Grass Experiment at Rothamsted Experimental Station in the U.K., where grassland field plots have been fertilized annually for the past 150 years (collated by Harpole and Tilman 2007). The number of plant species recorded in 10 plots is given in response to the number of different nutrient types added Plot 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Number of nutrients added 0 0 0 3144 E2 3 Number of plant species 36 36 32 34 33 30 20 23 21 16
In baseball, two statistics, the ERA (Earned Run Average) and the WHIP (Walks and Hits per Inning Pitched), are used to measure the quality of pitchers. For both measures, smaller values indicate higher quality. The following computer output gives the results from predicting ERA by using WHIP in a least-squares regression for the 2017 baseball season. Variable DF Estimate SE T Intercept 1 -5.0 0.26 - 19.3 WHIP 1 6.8 0.14 47.4 Which of the following statements is the best interpretation of the value 6.8 shown in the output? ERA is predicted to increase by 6.8 units for each 1 unit increase of WHIP. WHIP is predicted to increase by 6.8 units for each 1 unit increase of ERA. For a pitcher with 0 units of WHIP, the ERA is predicted to be approximately 6.8 units. For a pitcher with 0 units of ERA, the WHIP is predicted to be approximately 6.8 units. Approximately 6.8% of the variability in ERA is due to its linear relationship with WHIP.
Listed below are foot lengths (mm) and heights (mm) of males. Find the regression equation, letting foot length be the predictor (x) variable. Find the best predicted height of a male with a foot length of 273.3 mm. How does the result compare to the actual height of 1776 mm? Foot Length 281.9 278.3 253.2 258.7 278.7 257.8 274.2 262.2 Height 1784.8 1771.0 1675.6 1645.9 1858.7 1710.1 1789.2 1737.4 the regression equation is y=enter your response here+enter your response herex. (Round the y-intercept to the nearest integer as needed. Round the slope to two decimal places as needed.) The best predicted height of a male with a foot length of 273.3 mm is enter your response here mm. (Round to the nearest integer as needed.)
A researcher records data on 7 adult pairs' heights (in inches) to compare the physical characteristics of brothers and sisters. Brother Sister 71 69 68 64 6 65 67 63 70 65 71 62 66 62 Mean 68.4285 64.2857 SD 2.2253 2.4299 r=0.4050 What would the least-squares regression equation be for predicting the brother's height from the sister's? A. brother's height = 0.037+44.58 * sister's height B. brother's height = 44.58 + 0.371* sister's height C. brother's height = 20.71 + 0.029 * sister's height D. brother's height = 3.28- 40.68 * sister's height If the sister's height is the same as the mean (64.2857 inches), what would the brother's predicted height be A. 68.4285 (the same as the mean as well) B. 62.1234 C. 70.8990 D. None of the above. Which of the following would be correct? A. The pair of means, (68.4285, 64.2857), lies on the linear regression line. B. The effectiveness of the linear regression model is about 16%, C. The effectiveness of the linear regression model is 10096. D. Both…
Listed below are foot lengths (mm) and heights (mm) of males. Find the regression equation, letting foot length be the predictor (x) variable. Find the best predicted height of a male with a foot length of 272.7 mm. How does the result compare to the actual height of 1776 mm? Foot Length 282.3 277.8 252.8 258.7 279.0 258.4 274.1 261.7 Height 1785.0 1771.0 1675.7 1645.7 1859.3 1710.2 1789.2 1737.0 The regression equation is ŷ = + (x. (Round the y-intercept to the nearest integer as needed. Round the slope to two decimal places as needed.) The best predicted height of a male with a foot length of 272.7 mm is (Round to the nearest integer as needed.) How does the result compare to the actual height of 1776 mm? O A. The result is close to the actual height of 1776 mm. O B. The result is exactly the same as the actual height of 1776 mm. O C. The result is very different from the actual height of 1776 mm. O D. The result does not make sense given the context of the data. C mm.
Listed below are paired data consisting of movie budget amounts and the amounts that the movies grossed. Find the regression equation, letting the budget be the predictor (x) variable. Find the best predicted amount that a movie will gross if its budget is $140 million. Use a significance level of a = 0.05. Budget ($)in Millions Gross ($) in Millions 39 22 118 67 77 49 124 66 12 64 128 19 6. 147 9. 118 6. 99 75 127 107 95 99 64 109 209 44 8 293 48 Click the icon to view the critical values of the Pearson correlation coefficient r. The regression equation is y =+x. (Round to one decimal place as needed.)
The accompanying data represent the weights of various domestic cars and their gas mileages in the city. The linear correlation coefficient between the weight of a car and its miles per gallon in the city is r= - 0.972. The least-squares regression line treating weight as the explanatory variable and miles per gallon as the response variable is y= - 0.0070x + 44.4405. Complete parts (a) and (b) below. Click the icon to view the data table. ..... (a) What proportion of the variability in miles per gallon is explained by the relation between weight of the car and miles per gallon? The proportion of the variability in miles per gallon explained by the relation between weight of the car and miles per gallon is %. (Round to one decimal place as needed.) (b) Interpret the coefficient of determination. % of the variance in is by the linear model. Data Table (Round to one decimal p Full data set gas mileage Miles per Weight (pounds), x Weight (pounds), x Miles per Gallon, y Car Car Gallon, y…
Listed below are paired data consisting of movie budget amounts and the amounts that the movies grossed. Find the regression equation, letting the budget be the predictor (x) variable. Find the best predicted amount that a movie will gross if its budget is $135 million. Use a significance level of alpha equals 0.05 . Budget left parenthesis $ right parenthesis in Millions 45 24 115 74 72 48 117 67 4 60 124 24 6 152 8 Gross left parenthesis $ right parenthesis in Millions 115 10 95 69 127 112 93 101 50 102 223 26 18 282 56 The regression equation is ŷ = __ + __x. (Round to one decimal place as needed.)
Listed below are paired data consisting of movie budget amounts and the amounts that the movies grossed. Find the regression equation, letting the budget be the predictor (x) variable. Find the best predicted amount that a movie will gross if its budget is $105 million. Use a significance level of a = 0.05. Budget ($)in Millions Gross ($) in Millions 41 23 114 75 78 47 120 64 10 59 127 22 12 150 2 0 127 18 111 65 113 112 102 94 64 98 211 41 22 288 57 Click the icon to view the critical values of the Pearson correlation coefficient r. ..... x. (Round to one decimal place as needed.) The regression equation is = + The best predicted gross for a movie with a $105 million budget is $ million. (Round to one decimal place as needed.)
5) Please answer the question and show your work in the space provided. Medhavi suspects that there is a relationship between the number of text messages high school students send and their academic achievement. To explore this, she asks a random sample of 52 students at her school how many text messages they sent yesterday and what their grade point average (GPA) was during the most recent marking period. Her data are summarized in the scatter plot below. The least squares regression line is also shown. The equation of the least squares regression line is GPA=3.8-0.005(TextsSent). Interpret the quantities -0.005 and 3.8 in the context of the data. 4.25 4.00 - 3.75 3.50 3.25 3.00 - 2.75 2.50 - 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 Texts Sent

SEE MORE QUESTIONS

Recommended textbooks for you

MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications

Statistics

ISBN:

9781119256830

Author:

Amos Gilat

Publisher:

John Wiley & Sons Inc

Probability and Statistics for Engineering and th…

Statistics

ISBN:

9781305251809

Author:

Jay L. Devore

Publisher:

Cengage Learning

Statistics for The Behavioral Sciences (MindTap C…

Statistics

ISBN:

9781305504912

Author:

Frederick J Gravetter, Larry B. Wallnau

Publisher:

Cengage Learning

MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications

Statistics

ISBN:

9781119256830

Author:

Amos Gilat

Publisher:

John Wiley & Sons Inc

Probability and Statistics for Engineering and th…

Statistics

ISBN:

9781305251809

Author:

Jay L. Devore

Publisher:

Cengage Learning

Statistics for The Behavioral Sciences (MindTap C…

Statistics

ISBN:

9781305504912

Author:

Frederick J Gravetter, Larry B. Wallnau

Publisher:

Cengage Learning

Elementary Statistics: Picturing the World (7th E…

Statistics

ISBN:

9780134683416

Author:

Ron Larson, Betsy Farber

Publisher:

PEARSON

The Basic Practice of Statistics

Statistics

ISBN:

9781319042578

Author:

David S. Moore, William I. Notz, Michael A. Fligner

Publisher:

W. H. Freeman

Introduction to the Practice of Statistics

Statistics

ISBN:

9781319013387

Author:

David S. Moore, George P. McCabe, Bruce A. Craig

Publisher:

W. H. Freeman

SEE MORE TEXTBOOKS