Bausch Company is presented with the following two mutually exclusive projects. The required return for both projects is 13 percent. Year 0 91234 Project M -$144,000 63,100 81,100 72,100 58,100 Project N -$351,000 154,500 176,000 139,500 106,000

Essentials Of Investments
11th Edition
ISBN:9781260013924
Author:Bodie, Zvi, Kane, Alex, MARCUS, Alan J.
Publisher:Bodie, Zvi, Kane, Alex, MARCUS, Alan J.
Chapter1: Investments: Background And Issues
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1PS
icon
Related questions
icon
Concept explainers
Topic Video
Question
### Bausch Company Project Analysis

Bausch Company is evaluating two mutually exclusive projects, M and N. Both projects have a required return rate of 13 percent. Below is a comparison of the cash flows for each project over a four-year period:

#### Cash Flow Table:

| Year | Project M | Project N  |
|------|-----------|------------|
| 0    | -$144,000 | -$351,000  |
| 1    | $63,100   | $154,500   |
| 2    | $81,100   | $176,000   |
| 3    | $72,100   | $139,500   |
| 4    | $58,100   | $106,000   |

**Explanation:**

- **Year 0**: Both projects require an initial investment. Project M requires $144,000, and Project N requires $351,000.
- **Years 1-4**: Each project generates positive cash flows:
  - **Project M**: 
    - Year 1: $63,100
    - Year 2: $81,100
    - Year 3: $72,100
    - Year 4: $58,100
  - **Project N**:
    - Year 1: $154,500
    - Year 2: $176,000
    - Year 3: $139,500
    - Year 4: $106,000

These projects need to be evaluated on metrics such as Net Present Value (NPV) or Internal Rate of Return (IRR) to determine which project yields a better return considering the 13 percent required return rate.
Transcribed Image Text:### Bausch Company Project Analysis Bausch Company is evaluating two mutually exclusive projects, M and N. Both projects have a required return rate of 13 percent. Below is a comparison of the cash flows for each project over a four-year period: #### Cash Flow Table: | Year | Project M | Project N | |------|-----------|------------| | 0 | -$144,000 | -$351,000 | | 1 | $63,100 | $154,500 | | 2 | $81,100 | $176,000 | | 3 | $72,100 | $139,500 | | 4 | $58,100 | $106,000 | **Explanation:** - **Year 0**: Both projects require an initial investment. Project M requires $144,000, and Project N requires $351,000. - **Years 1-4**: Each project generates positive cash flows: - **Project M**: - Year 1: $63,100 - Year 2: $81,100 - Year 3: $72,100 - Year 4: $58,100 - **Project N**: - Year 1: $154,500 - Year 2: $176,000 - Year 3: $139,500 - Year 4: $106,000 These projects need to be evaluated on metrics such as Net Present Value (NPV) or Internal Rate of Return (IRR) to determine which project yields a better return considering the 13 percent required return rate.
**Transcription for Educational Website**

---

**Understanding Project Evaluation: IRR and NPV**

When evaluating projects for investment, it is crucial to calculate the Internal Rate of Return (IRR) and Net Present Value (NPV) to make informed decisions. Below is a guide to calculating these metrics for two hypothetical projects, Project M and Project N.

### Evaluation Criteria

**a. What is the IRR for each project?**
- **Instruction:** Do not round intermediate calculations and enter your answers as a percent rounded to 2 decimal places, e.g., 32.16%.

**b. What is the NPV for each project?**
- **Instruction:** Do not round intermediate calculations and round your answers to 2 decimal places, e.g., 32.16.

**c. Which, if either, of the projects should the company accept?**

### Data Entry Table

To facilitate the calculation and comparison, use the following table to input the IRR and NPV for both projects:

|       | Project M | Project N |
|-------|-----------|-----------|
| a.    |           |           |
| b.    |           |           |
| c. Accept project |           |           |

- **Row a:** Enter the IRR for Project M and Project N respectively.
- **Row b:** Enter the NPV for Project M and Project N respectively.
- **Row c:** Indicate which project, if any, the company should accept based on the calculated metrics.

---

**Diagram Explanation:**
The table provided is a simple matrix designed to systematically organize the IRR and NPV calculations for easy comparison. The columns correspond to each project, while the rows specify the required calculation or decision. Fill in each section with precision, following the rounding instructions, to ensure an accurate analysis.

---

Through this method, companies can comprehensively evaluate their investment opportunities and choose the project that maximizes potential returns.
Transcribed Image Text:**Transcription for Educational Website** --- **Understanding Project Evaluation: IRR and NPV** When evaluating projects for investment, it is crucial to calculate the Internal Rate of Return (IRR) and Net Present Value (NPV) to make informed decisions. Below is a guide to calculating these metrics for two hypothetical projects, Project M and Project N. ### Evaluation Criteria **a. What is the IRR for each project?** - **Instruction:** Do not round intermediate calculations and enter your answers as a percent rounded to 2 decimal places, e.g., 32.16%. **b. What is the NPV for each project?** - **Instruction:** Do not round intermediate calculations and round your answers to 2 decimal places, e.g., 32.16. **c. Which, if either, of the projects should the company accept?** ### Data Entry Table To facilitate the calculation and comparison, use the following table to input the IRR and NPV for both projects: | | Project M | Project N | |-------|-----------|-----------| | a. | | | | b. | | | | c. Accept project | | | - **Row a:** Enter the IRR for Project M and Project N respectively. - **Row b:** Enter the NPV for Project M and Project N respectively. - **Row c:** Indicate which project, if any, the company should accept based on the calculated metrics. --- **Diagram Explanation:** The table provided is a simple matrix designed to systematically organize the IRR and NPV calculations for easy comparison. The columns correspond to each project, while the rows specify the required calculation or decision. Fill in each section with precision, following the rounding instructions, to ensure an accurate analysis. --- Through this method, companies can comprehensively evaluate their investment opportunities and choose the project that maximizes potential returns.
Expert Solution
trending now

Trending now

This is a popular solution!

steps

Step by step

Solved in 4 steps with 4 images

Blurred answer
Knowledge Booster
Capital Budgeting
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, finance and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.
Similar questions
  • SEE MORE QUESTIONS
Recommended textbooks for you
Essentials Of Investments
Essentials Of Investments
Finance
ISBN:
9781260013924
Author:
Bodie, Zvi, Kane, Alex, MARCUS, Alan J.
Publisher:
Mcgraw-hill Education,
FUNDAMENTALS OF CORPORATE FINANCE
FUNDAMENTALS OF CORPORATE FINANCE
Finance
ISBN:
9781260013962
Author:
BREALEY
Publisher:
RENT MCG
Financial Management: Theory & Practice
Financial Management: Theory & Practice
Finance
ISBN:
9781337909730
Author:
Brigham
Publisher:
Cengage
Foundations Of Finance
Foundations Of Finance
Finance
ISBN:
9780134897264
Author:
KEOWN, Arthur J., Martin, John D., PETTY, J. William
Publisher:
Pearson,
Fundamentals of Financial Management (MindTap Cou…
Fundamentals of Financial Management (MindTap Cou…
Finance
ISBN:
9781337395250
Author:
Eugene F. Brigham, Joel F. Houston
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Corporate Finance (The Mcgraw-hill/Irwin Series i…
Corporate Finance (The Mcgraw-hill/Irwin Series i…
Finance
ISBN:
9780077861759
Author:
Stephen A. Ross Franco Modigliani Professor of Financial Economics Professor, Randolph W Westerfield Robert R. Dockson Deans Chair in Bus. Admin., Jeffrey Jaffe, Bradford D Jordan Professor
Publisher:
McGraw-Hill Education