Barnacle Industries was awarded a patent over 15 years ago for a unique industrial strength cleaner that removes barnacles and other particles from the hulls of ships. Thanks to its monopoly position, Barnacle has earned more than $160 million over the past decade. Its customers-spanning the gamut from cruise lines to freighters-use the product because it reduces their fuel bills. The annual (inverse) demand function for Barnacie's product is given by P= 450 -00, and Barnacle's cost function is given by a9 = 280Q Thanks to subsidies stemming from an energy bill passed by Congress nearly two decades ago, Barnacle does not have any fixed costs: The federal government essentially pays for the plant and capital equipment required to make this energy-saving product. Absent this subsidy, Barnacle's fixed costs would be about $8 million annually. Knowing that the company's patent will soon expire, Marge, Barnacle's manager, is concerned that entrants will qualify for the subsidy, enter the market, and produce a perfect substitute at an identical cost. With interest rates at 5 percent, Marge is considering a limit-pricing strategy. What would Barnacle's profits be if Marge pursues a limit-pricing strategy if the subsidy is in place? Instructions: Enter your responses to the nearest penny (two decimal places). What would Barnacle's profits be if Marge convinces the government to eliminate the subsidy? What would be the profit of a new entrant if the subsidy is eliminated and Barnacle continues to produce the monopoly level of output? Which strategy is more beneficial to Barnacle?
Barnacle Industries was awarded a patent over 15 years ago for a unique industrial strength cleaner that removes barnacles and other particles from the hulls of ships. Thanks to its monopoly position, Barnacle has earned more than $160 million over the past decade. Its customers-spanning the gamut from cruise lines to freighters-use the product because it reduces their fuel bills. The annual (inverse) demand function for Barnacie's product is given by P= 450 -00, and Barnacle's cost function is given by a9 = 280Q Thanks to subsidies stemming from an energy bill passed by Congress nearly two decades ago, Barnacle does not have any fixed costs: The federal government essentially pays for the plant and capital equipment required to make this energy-saving product. Absent this subsidy, Barnacle's fixed costs would be about $8 million annually. Knowing that the company's patent will soon expire, Marge, Barnacle's manager, is concerned that entrants will qualify for the subsidy, enter the market, and produce a perfect substitute at an identical cost. With interest rates at 5 percent, Marge is considering a limit-pricing strategy. What would Barnacle's profits be if Marge pursues a limit-pricing strategy if the subsidy is in place? Instructions: Enter your responses to the nearest penny (two decimal places). What would Barnacle's profits be if Marge convinces the government to eliminate the subsidy? What would be the profit of a new entrant if the subsidy is eliminated and Barnacle continues to produce the monopoly level of output? Which strategy is more beneficial to Barnacle?
Managerial Economics: Applications, Strategies and Tactics (MindTap Course List)
14th Edition
ISBN:9781305506381
Author:James R. McGuigan, R. Charles Moyer, Frederick H.deB. Harris
Publisher:James R. McGuigan, R. Charles Moyer, Frederick H.deB. Harris
Chapter16: Government Regulation
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 6E
Related questions
Question
N6
Transcribed Image Text:Barnacle Industries was awarded a patent over 15 years ago for a unique industrial strength cleaner that removes barnacles and other
particles from the hulis of ships. Thanks to its monopoly position, Barnacle has earned more than $160 million over the past decade. Its
customers-spanning the gamut from cruiselines to freighters-use the product because it reduces their fuel billis. The annual (inverse)
demand function for Barnacle's product is given by P= 450 -0Q, and Barnacle's cost function is given by qa) = 280Q Thanks to
subsidies stemming from an energy bill passed by Congress nearly two decades ago, Barnacle does not have any fixed costs: The
federal government essentially pays for the plant and capital equipment required to make this energy-saving product.
Absent this subsidy, Barnacle's fixed costs would be about $8 million annually. Knowing that the company's patent will soon expire,
Marge, Barnacle's manager, is concerned that entrants will qualify for the subsidy, enter the market, and produce a perfect substitute at
an identical cost. With interest rates at 5 percent, Marge is considering a limit-pricing strategy.
What would Barnacle's profits be if Marge pursues a limit-pricing strategy if the subsidy is in place?
ces
Instructions: Enter your responses to the nearest penny (two decimal places).
What would Barnacle's profits be if Marge convinces the government to eliminate the subsidy?
What would be the profit of a new entrant if the subsidy is eliminated and Barnacle continues to produce the monopoly level of
output?
Which strategy is more beneficial to Barnacle?
Expert Solution
This question has been solved!
Explore an expertly crafted, step-by-step solution for a thorough understanding of key concepts.
This is a popular solution!
Trending now
This is a popular solution!
Step by step
Solved in 4 steps
Recommended textbooks for you
Managerial Economics: Applications, Strategies an…
Economics
ISBN:
9781305506381
Author:
James R. McGuigan, R. Charles Moyer, Frederick H.deB. Harris
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics: Applications, Strategies an…
Economics
ISBN:
9781305506381
Author:
James R. McGuigan, R. Charles Moyer, Frederick H.deB. Harris
Publisher:
Cengage Learning