Background In a previous lab, the results of a study conducted at a large university was presented. It compared the effectiveness of two alternative teaching methods in first-year algebra courses: "Method 1" and "Method 2". To ensure that the selected methodology benefited all first-year students at the university, the committee conducted a randomized trial. Three sections of the course were opened: one where a professor taught the material in a standard way, one where a professor taught using Method 1, and one where a professor taught using Method 2. Students were then randomly assigned to one of the three algebra courses but were not told that the methods of instruction varied. (Each method was assigned 100 students.) After the completion of these courses, the final grades of the students were compiled into a database. This database was used to decide which instructional method will be implemented in future classes. Data The “comma separated variable" (csv) file containing (fictitious) students' final grades is included below. It is entitled "TestScores(2).csv" and can be downloaded. This dataset contains 300 values divided into three columns: standard method, new method 1, and new method 2. These labels correspond to the teaching strategies implemented in the scenario described above. Use descriptive statistics to characterize these data and draw conclusions. (Data: TestScores(2).csv) Scenario At the conclusion of the semester, the standard method of instruction yielded 100 grades with a mean final grade of 74.161% and a standard deviation of roughly 10.78%. A mathematics professor in the department stated that he thinks, or average, students score a 78% in the first-year algebra course; however, the mean from the sample data ssuggests that the true average could be lower. Answer the following questions to determine if the true population mean 78% at the 5% significance level. Since experimental methods were used in "Method 1" and "Method 2", these grades will be ignored. Only grades from the "Standard Method" will be considered. lower than
Background In a previous lab, the results of a study conducted at a large university was presented. It compared the effectiveness of two alternative teaching methods in first-year algebra courses: "Method 1" and "Method 2". To ensure that the selected methodology benefited all first-year students at the university, the committee conducted a randomized trial. Three sections of the course were opened: one where a professor taught the material in a standard way, one where a professor taught using Method 1, and one where a professor taught using Method 2. Students were then randomly assigned to one of the three algebra courses but were not told that the methods of instruction varied. (Each method was assigned 100 students.) After the completion of these courses, the final grades of the students were compiled into a database. This database was used to decide which instructional method will be implemented in future classes. Data The “comma separated variable" (csv) file containing (fictitious) students' final grades is included below. It is entitled "TestScores(2).csv" and can be downloaded. This dataset contains 300 values divided into three columns: standard method, new method 1, and new method 2. These labels correspond to the teaching strategies implemented in the scenario described above. Use descriptive statistics to characterize these data and draw conclusions. (Data: TestScores(2).csv) Scenario At the conclusion of the semester, the standard method of instruction yielded 100 grades with a mean final grade of 74.161% and a standard deviation of roughly 10.78%. A mathematics professor in the department stated that he thinks, or average, students score a 78% in the first-year algebra course; however, the mean from the sample data ssuggests that the true average could be lower. Answer the following questions to determine if the true population mean 78% at the 5% significance level. Since experimental methods were used in "Method 1" and "Method 2", these grades will be ignored. Only grades from the "Standard Method" will be considered. lower than
MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
6th Edition
ISBN:9781119256830
Author:Amos Gilat
Publisher:Amos Gilat
Chapter1: Starting With Matlab
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1P
Related questions
Question
Write a concluding statement that summarizes your results of the one-sample hypothesis test. Include the significance level and whether the null hypothesis can be rejected.
P value = 0.000285
T score = -3.56
Expert Solution
This question has been solved!
Explore an expertly crafted, step-by-step solution for a thorough understanding of key concepts.
This is a popular solution!
Trending now
This is a popular solution!
Step by step
Solved in 2 steps with 2 images
Recommended textbooks for you
MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
Statistics
ISBN:
9781119256830
Author:
Amos Gilat
Publisher:
John Wiley & Sons Inc
Probability and Statistics for Engineering and th…
Statistics
ISBN:
9781305251809
Author:
Jay L. Devore
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Statistics for The Behavioral Sciences (MindTap C…
Statistics
ISBN:
9781305504912
Author:
Frederick J Gravetter, Larry B. Wallnau
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
Statistics
ISBN:
9781119256830
Author:
Amos Gilat
Publisher:
John Wiley & Sons Inc
Probability and Statistics for Engineering and th…
Statistics
ISBN:
9781305251809
Author:
Jay L. Devore
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Statistics for The Behavioral Sciences (MindTap C…
Statistics
ISBN:
9781305504912
Author:
Frederick J Gravetter, Larry B. Wallnau
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Elementary Statistics: Picturing the World (7th E…
Statistics
ISBN:
9780134683416
Author:
Ron Larson, Betsy Farber
Publisher:
PEARSON
The Basic Practice of Statistics
Statistics
ISBN:
9781319042578
Author:
David S. Moore, William I. Notz, Michael A. Fligner
Publisher:
W. H. Freeman
Introduction to the Practice of Statistics
Statistics
ISBN:
9781319013387
Author:
David S. Moore, George P. McCabe, Bruce A. Craig
Publisher:
W. H. Freeman