ata: Rate difference per 1000 PY: ___-2.17__; 95% CI __-4.30___ to _-0.03____ HR: __79___; 95% CI _0.63____ to _0.99____ Which statement is the most correct interpretation of the risk of pooled stroke or systemic emboli in the propensity-matched analysis? Apixaban resulted in a statistically significant decrease in stroke or systemic emboli compared to rivaroxaban Apixaban resulted in a statistically significant increase in stroke or systemic emboli compared to rivaroxaban There was no statistically significant difference in stroke or systemic emboli between apixaban and rivaroxaban.
ata: Rate difference per 1000 PY: ___-2.17__; 95% CI __-4.30___ to _-0.03____ HR: __79___; 95% CI _0.63____ to _0.99____ Which statement is the most correct interpretation of the risk of pooled stroke or systemic emboli in the propensity-matched analysis? Apixaban resulted in a statistically significant decrease in stroke or systemic emboli compared to rivaroxaban Apixaban resulted in a statistically significant increase in stroke or systemic emboli compared to rivaroxaban There was no statistically significant difference in stroke or systemic emboli between apixaban and rivaroxaban.
MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
6th Edition
ISBN:9781119256830
Author:Amos Gilat
Publisher:Amos Gilat
Chapter1: Starting With Matlab
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1P
Related questions
Question
Data:
- Rate difference per 1000 PY: ___-2.17__; 95% CI __-4.30___ to _-0.03____
- HR: __79___; 95% CI _0.63____ to _0.99____
Which statement is the most correct interpretation of the risk of pooled stroke or systemic emboli in the propensity-matched analysis?
-
- Apixaban resulted in a statistically significant decrease in stroke or systemic emboli compared to rivaroxaban
- Apixaban resulted in a statistically significant increase in stroke or systemic emboli compared to rivaroxaban
- There was no statistically significant difference in stroke or systemic emboli between apixaban and rivaroxaban.
Expert Solution
Step 1: Given Information
Given that,
The rate difference per 1000 PY is -2.17, with a 95% CI is between -4.30 and -0..03.
The Hazard ratio is 0.79, with a 95% CI from 0.63 to 0.99.
The objective is to find the correct interpretation of the risk of pooled stroke or systemic emboli in the propensity-matched analysis.
Step by step
Solved in 3 steps
Recommended textbooks for you
MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
Statistics
ISBN:
9781119256830
Author:
Amos Gilat
Publisher:
John Wiley & Sons Inc
Probability and Statistics for Engineering and th…
Statistics
ISBN:
9781305251809
Author:
Jay L. Devore
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Statistics for The Behavioral Sciences (MindTap C…
Statistics
ISBN:
9781305504912
Author:
Frederick J Gravetter, Larry B. Wallnau
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
Statistics
ISBN:
9781119256830
Author:
Amos Gilat
Publisher:
John Wiley & Sons Inc
Probability and Statistics for Engineering and th…
Statistics
ISBN:
9781305251809
Author:
Jay L. Devore
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Statistics for The Behavioral Sciences (MindTap C…
Statistics
ISBN:
9781305504912
Author:
Frederick J Gravetter, Larry B. Wallnau
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Elementary Statistics: Picturing the World (7th E…
Statistics
ISBN:
9780134683416
Author:
Ron Larson, Betsy Farber
Publisher:
PEARSON
The Basic Practice of Statistics
Statistics
ISBN:
9781319042578
Author:
David S. Moore, William I. Notz, Michael A. Fligner
Publisher:
W. H. Freeman
Introduction to the Practice of Statistics
Statistics
ISBN:
9781319013387
Author:
David S. Moore, George P. McCabe, Bruce A. Craig
Publisher:
W. H. Freeman