time and growsAssume we have a sorted list. Binary search algorithm takescase as n grows.the linear search algorithm in the worst-O(n), slower thanO(log (n)), faster thanO(log (n)), it dependsO(n), faster thannone of the cases are correctO(log (n)), slower thanO O(n/2), at the same speed as

Assume we have a sorted list. Binary search algorithm takes time and grows the linear search algorithm in the worst- case as n grows. O(n), slower than O(log (n)), faster than O(log (n)), it depends O(n), faster than none of the cases are correct O(log (n)), slower than O O(n/2), at the same speed as

Assume we have a sorted list. Binary search algorithm takes time and grows the linear search algorithm in the worst- case as n grows. O(n), slower than O(log (n)), faster than O(log (n)), it depends O(n), faster than none of the cases are correct O(log (n)), slower than O O(n/2), at the same speed as

Database System Concepts

7th Edition

ISBN:9780078022159

Author:Abraham Silberschatz Professor, Henry F. Korth, S. Sudarshan

Publisher:Abraham Silberschatz Professor, Henry F. Korth, S. Sudarshan

Chapter1: Introduction

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1PE

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Suppose that, in a divide-and-conquer algorithm, we always divide an instance of size n of a problem into 10 subinstances of size n/3, and the dividing and combining steps take a time in Θ(n 2) . Write a recurrence
1. Let S be a set of n arbitrary but distinct numbers. (a) Give a deterministic algorithm to output the largest n³/4 of the numbers in S in sorted order. Your algorithm must use O(n) comparisons. (b) Show that any deterministic comparison-based algorithm that correctly outputs the median on inputs of n distinct elements must use at least n 1 comparisons. To be completely precise, the median is defined to be the [n/2]th smallest element.
How did my textbook get 2(n − 1) + 1 = 2n − 1 comparisons are used whenever this algorithm is applied: (textbook solves the time complexity of finding the maximum element in a finite set using the following algorithm) Algorithm below: procedure max(a1, a2,…, an: integers) max := a1 for i := 2 to n if max < ai then max := ai return max{max is the largest element}
The following Prefix_Average algorithm needs O(n-logn). def Prefix_Average(Seq): sum = 0 length = len(Seq) Avg = [0] * length for i in range (length): sum += Seq[i] Avg[i] = sum / (i+1) return Avg True or False? Please solve it as soon as possible
provide one example for each common run time complexity: O(1) Constant- e.g. Array access O(log n) logarithmic - e.g. Binary Search O(n) linear - e.g. Linear Search thanks!
Sorting a data set is an important sub-problem in data science. Given the size n of a data set, whichstatements are correct?a) Bubble Sort has worst-case run-time complexity O(n).b) Bubble Sort has worst-case run-time complexity O(n log N).c) Bubble Sort has worst-case run-time complexity O(n2).d) Merge Sort has worst-case run-time complexity O(n).e) Merge Sort has worst-case run-time complexity O(n log N).f) Merge Sort has worst-case run-time complexity O(n2).g) Quick Sort has worst-case run-time complexity O(n).h) Quick Sort has worst-case run-time complexity O(n log N).i) Quick Sort has worst-case run-time complexity O(n2).
Find the function that best represents the temporal order of the following algorithms in the worst case.Count the operations of addition (+) and multiplication (×). Suppose that the array K contains n values.polyEval(K: whole array, x: whole): whole y ← K[n − 1] for i ← n − 2, n − 3 .. 0 y ← y × x + K[i] end for return y end polyEval justify your answer please
11. Given is a sequence X of n keys k1, k2, ..., kin. For each key k; (1 < i< n), its position in sorted order differs from i by at most d. Present an O(n log d)-time sequential algorithm to sort X. Prove the correctness of your algorithm using the zero-one principle. Implement the same algorithm on a yn x Vn mesh. What is the resultant run time?
There are 3 algorithms to solve the same problem. Let n = problem size. Suppose that their runtime complexities are as follows: Runtime complexity of algorithm 1: T₁ (n) 2 Σ₁k² +logn³ +4 k=1 Runtime complexity of algorithm 2: T₂(n) 8n² + 2n+n√n Runtime complexity of algorithm 3: T3(n) = n logn + log4 nª + 64n Find asymptotic tight bound (Big-✪) of each runtime complexity, e.g. write T₁(n) = ☺(...). Which algorithm's runtime has the biggest growth rate, and which one has the smallest growth rate? Which algorithm is the most runtime efficient? = logn