Assume the development environment is Unix workstations, and the documentation team uses the Macintosh platform for writing documentation. The client requires the documents to be available on Windows platforms. Developers produce the design documentation using Frame Maker. The documentation team uses Microsoft Word for the user-level documentation. The client submits corrections on handcopies and does not need to modify the delivered documents. How could the information flow between the developers, the technical writers, and the client be set up (e.g., format, tools, etc.) such that duplication of files is minimized while everybody's tool preferences and platform requirements are still satisfied?

Assume the development environment is Unix workstations, and the documentation team uses the Macintosh platform for writing documentation. The client requires the documents to be available on Windows platforms. Developers produce the design documentation using Frame Maker. The documentation team uses Microsoft Word for the user-level documentation. The client submits corrections on handcopies and does not need to modify the delivered documents. How could the information flow between the developers, the technical writers, and the client be set up (e.g., format, tools, etc.) such that duplication of files is minimized while everybody's tool preferences and platform requirements are still satisfied?

Database System Concepts

7th Edition

ISBN:9780078022159

Author:Abraham Silberschatz Professor, Henry F. Korth, S. Sudarshan

Publisher:Abraham Silberschatz Professor, Henry F. Korth, S. Sudarshan

Chapter1: Introduction

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1PE

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Is it the developer's responsibility to provide code that is simple to maintain, even if the client doesn't ask for it?
Justify why deep access is preferable to shallow access from a programmer's perspective; do not depend just on performance concerns.
In XCode, there is a sophisticated tool called the Apple Interface Builder that has a lot of special features. What aspect of the system made the most sense to you? What was challenging and confusing? How does the interface builder in XCode perform?
Answer the given question with a proper explanation and step-by-step solution. Please, do it carefully and completely. [ You will write test code in a text document, the code you have written through file reading will be developed to detect the given attributes. For example, when you write a comment line, it will write the code line number to the test code for compiler purposes, it will say that there is a comment line in this line and it will reflect what is written.] While writing your codes, you must use explanation lines and descriptive expressions for your codes. The compiler you will code will be capable of recognizing the following language features; Note: The compiler code will run by reading the file, in which sample code will be written to create a text document and test the following features. Variable definition as numeric and character set Assigning values to variables Mathematical (+, -, *, /, %) operations Printing information on the screen Getting value from…
You were hired to develop the software for a robotic cook, responsible for preparing orders in a restaurant. The robot receives the orders and queues them for execution. Draw a UML diagram to explain how you would use the Command design pattern for representing how you represent the orders to the robot (e.g., Clean, PrepareOnionSoup, PrepareHamburguer).
Give reasons why deep access is preferable to shallow access from the standpoint of a developer, rather than just making a performance-based argument for it.
In game engine and development, what is a standard client-application looks like. For context in developing my own game engine, the client would have to have a layer class and some Application class that will contain all those layers. Another thing to side-note is this would be great if you can visually show in C++ pseudo-code as part of your explanation, thank you.What is a standard way to design the client's perspective project API. Would they be layered-based? How do complex engines abstract these layers portion code, so users do not have to worry about creating instances of these layers?An example is unreal engine after the user creates a new project is generated the source files for the model, actor, world, and etc. In this context how does large engines abstract or in other words look into designing an effective API for the user to allow to focus on the actual development of the game, instead of the boilerplate of their client-side code?
Architecture to the end state (as best as you can) then implement in phases, but never architect and implement in phases. Discuss the statement.
Having a firm grasp of the significance of a program's settings is crucial. Where do we stand on the procedures involved in configuration administration?
Assume the development environment is Unix workstations, and the documentation team uses the Macintosh platform for writing documentation. The client requires the documents to be available on Windows platforms. Developers produce the design documentation using Frame Maker. The documentation team uses Microsoft Word for the user-level documentation. The client submits corrections on handcopies and does not need to modify the delivered documents. How could the information flow between the developers, the technical writers, and the client be set up (e.g., format, tools, etc.) such that duplication of files is minimized while everybody's tool preferences and platform requirements are still satisfied?
Assume the development environment is Unix workstations, and the documentation team uses the Macintosh platform for writing documentation. The client requires the documents to be available on Windows platforms. Developers produce the design documentation using Frame Maker. The documentation team uses Microsoft Word for the user-level documentation. The client submits corrections on handcopies and does not need to modify the delivered documents. How could the information flow between the developers, the technical writers, and the client be set up (e.g., format, tools, etc.) such that duplication of files is minimized while everybody's tool preferences and platform requirements are still satisfied?
An interface's limitations may be severe. When a user can't access the Windows desktop or the Internet, for example, the interface design may be restrictive. Is it appropriate for a user interface to impose such limitations? Is there a reason for this or not?