Assume that the samples were actually only 100 in each case, calculate the relevant test statistic for the test in part 4 above. Estimate the þ-value. Would you Reject H,? 6. 1 P-value: Alternative Hypothesis is 69.5% or 0.695 The corresponding probability based on the z-table is 0.5. Therefore, the p-value is 1 - 0.5 = 0.5 Since p-value is z significance level, we do hot reject H. ^ this doesn't account for the sample of 100 im not sure how to do it

MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
6th Edition
ISBN:9781119256830
Author:Amos Gilat
Publisher:Amos Gilat
Chapter1: Starting With Matlab
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1P
icon
Related questions
Question
100%

hey for that table we were supposed to answer this questions. its in the image 2. for that image there is a question which is question 6. how would you do that question please. 

Table 1. Prevalence of and Percentage Change in 12-Month Alcohol Use by Sociodemographic Characteristics,
2001-2002 and 2012-2013
% (95% CI)
NESARC 2001-2002
NESARC-III 2012-2013
Sociodemographic Characteristic
(n = 43 093)
(n = 36 309)a
% Change
Total
65.4 (64.3-66.6)
72.7 (71.4-73.9)
11.2
Sex
Men
71.8 (70.6-73.0)
76.7 (75.5-77.9)
6.8
Women
59.6 (58.0-61.1)
69.0 (67.5-70.5)
15.8
Race/ethnicity
White
69.5 (68.2-70.8)
75.3 (73.7-76.9)
8.3
Black
53.2 (51.6-54.9)
66.1 (63.8-68.3)
24.2
Native American
58.2 (53.0-63.4)
73.9 (69.1-78.1)
27.0
Asian or Pacific Islander
48.4 (44.3-52.5)
62.5 (59.4-65.5)
29.1
Hispanic
59.9 (58.1-61.7)
70.2 (68.8-71.7)
17.2
Age, y
18-29
73.1 (71.5-74.7)
80.1 (78.8-81.3)
9.6
30-44
71.9 (70.4-73.4)
79.5 (78.1-80.8)
10.6
45-64
64.3 (62.9-65.7)
71.9 (70.3-73.5)
11.8
265
45.1 (43.4-46.8)
55.2 (52.8-57.6)
22.4
Marital status
Married or cohabiting
66.3 (65.0-67.6)
73.1 (71.6-74.5)
10.3
Widowed, divorced, or separated
56.8 (55.3-58.3)
67.2 (65.4-68.9)
18.3
Never married
70.1 (68.5-71.7)
76.6 (75.1-78.0)
9.3
Educational level
Less than high school
46.4 (44.8-47.9)
55.8 (53.5-58.1)
20.3
High school
60.9 (59.5-62.3)
68.0 (66.5-69.5)
11.7
Some college or higher
73.3 (72.1-74.5)
78.3 (77.1-79.5)
6.8
Family income, $
0-19 999
52.4 (51.1-53.6)
64.1 (62.2-65.9)
22.3
20 000-34 999
61.0 (59.5-62.4)
68.5 (66.8-70.1)
12.3
35 000-69 999
68.1 (66.7-69.4)
73.4 (71.8-74.9)
7.8
270000
78.4 (76.8-80.0)
81.0 (79.5-82.4)
3.3
Poverty threshold, %
<100
52.1 (50.4-53.9)
64.3 (62.5-66.0)
23.4
100-200
55.2 (53.8-56.6)
66.4 (64.4-68.3)
20.3
>200
71.3 (70.0-72.5)
77.8 (76.5-79.0)
9.1
Urbanicity
Urban
67.2 (65.8-68.5)
74.0 (72.9-75.1)
10.1
Rural
58.4 (56.5-60.2)
67.9 (64.8-70.9)
16.3
Region
Northeast
70.9 (67.2-74.4)
77.1 (75.3-78.9)
8.7
Midwest
69.9 (68.4-71.4)
76.5 (74.5-78.5)
9.4
South
59.0 (57.2-60.7)
68.2 (66.0-70.4)
15.6
West
66.1 (63.5-68.7)
72.9 (69.8-75.7)
10.3
Transcribed Image Text:Table 1. Prevalence of and Percentage Change in 12-Month Alcohol Use by Sociodemographic Characteristics, 2001-2002 and 2012-2013 % (95% CI) NESARC 2001-2002 NESARC-III 2012-2013 Sociodemographic Characteristic (n = 43 093) (n = 36 309)a % Change Total 65.4 (64.3-66.6) 72.7 (71.4-73.9) 11.2 Sex Men 71.8 (70.6-73.0) 76.7 (75.5-77.9) 6.8 Women 59.6 (58.0-61.1) 69.0 (67.5-70.5) 15.8 Race/ethnicity White 69.5 (68.2-70.8) 75.3 (73.7-76.9) 8.3 Black 53.2 (51.6-54.9) 66.1 (63.8-68.3) 24.2 Native American 58.2 (53.0-63.4) 73.9 (69.1-78.1) 27.0 Asian or Pacific Islander 48.4 (44.3-52.5) 62.5 (59.4-65.5) 29.1 Hispanic 59.9 (58.1-61.7) 70.2 (68.8-71.7) 17.2 Age, y 18-29 73.1 (71.5-74.7) 80.1 (78.8-81.3) 9.6 30-44 71.9 (70.4-73.4) 79.5 (78.1-80.8) 10.6 45-64 64.3 (62.9-65.7) 71.9 (70.3-73.5) 11.8 265 45.1 (43.4-46.8) 55.2 (52.8-57.6) 22.4 Marital status Married or cohabiting 66.3 (65.0-67.6) 73.1 (71.6-74.5) 10.3 Widowed, divorced, or separated 56.8 (55.3-58.3) 67.2 (65.4-68.9) 18.3 Never married 70.1 (68.5-71.7) 76.6 (75.1-78.0) 9.3 Educational level Less than high school 46.4 (44.8-47.9) 55.8 (53.5-58.1) 20.3 High school 60.9 (59.5-62.3) 68.0 (66.5-69.5) 11.7 Some college or higher 73.3 (72.1-74.5) 78.3 (77.1-79.5) 6.8 Family income, $ 0-19 999 52.4 (51.1-53.6) 64.1 (62.2-65.9) 22.3 20 000-34 999 61.0 (59.5-62.4) 68.5 (66.8-70.1) 12.3 35 000-69 999 68.1 (66.7-69.4) 73.4 (71.8-74.9) 7.8 270000 78.4 (76.8-80.0) 81.0 (79.5-82.4) 3.3 Poverty threshold, % <100 52.1 (50.4-53.9) 64.3 (62.5-66.0) 23.4 100-200 55.2 (53.8-56.6) 66.4 (64.4-68.3) 20.3 >200 71.3 (70.0-72.5) 77.8 (76.5-79.0) 9.1 Urbanicity Urban 67.2 (65.8-68.5) 74.0 (72.9-75.1) 10.1 Rural 58.4 (56.5-60.2) 67.9 (64.8-70.9) 16.3 Region Northeast 70.9 (67.2-74.4) 77.1 (75.3-78.9) 8.7 Midwest 69.9 (68.4-71.4) 76.5 (74.5-78.5) 9.4 South 59.0 (57.2-60.7) 68.2 (66.0-70.4) 15.6 West 66.1 (63.5-68.7) 72.9 (69.8-75.7) 10.3
What are the null and alternative
hypotheses to test if the proportion of
White Americans with 12 month
Alcohol use is different in 2012
4
1
Ho:p=
0:p = 69.5
H.
a :p > 69.5
compared to 2000?
The table says there is an 8% change Increase/ original number x 100 =
n the proportion for White Americans. þroportion
Demonstrate how this was calculated.
1
(75.3-69.5)/ 69.5 x 100 = 8.3%
Assume that the samples were
actually only 100 in each case,
calculate the relevant test statistic for
the test in part 4 above. Estimate the
þ-value. Would you Reject H,?
1
P-value:
Alternative Hypothesis is 69.5% or 0.695
The corresponding probability based on the
z-table is 0.5.
Therefore, the p-value is 1 - 0.5 = 0.5
Since p-value is > significance level, we do
hot reject H.
^ this doesn't account for the sample of
100 im not sure how to do it
LO
CO
Transcribed Image Text:What are the null and alternative hypotheses to test if the proportion of White Americans with 12 month Alcohol use is different in 2012 4 1 Ho:p= 0:p = 69.5 H. a :p > 69.5 compared to 2000? The table says there is an 8% change Increase/ original number x 100 = n the proportion for White Americans. þroportion Demonstrate how this was calculated. 1 (75.3-69.5)/ 69.5 x 100 = 8.3% Assume that the samples were actually only 100 in each case, calculate the relevant test statistic for the test in part 4 above. Estimate the þ-value. Would you Reject H,? 1 P-value: Alternative Hypothesis is 69.5% or 0.695 The corresponding probability based on the z-table is 0.5. Therefore, the p-value is 1 - 0.5 = 0.5 Since p-value is > significance level, we do hot reject H. ^ this doesn't account for the sample of 100 im not sure how to do it LO CO
Expert Solution
steps

Step by step

Solved in 2 steps

Blurred answer
Knowledge Booster
Paths and Circuits
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, statistics and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.
Recommended textbooks for you
MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
Statistics
ISBN:
9781119256830
Author:
Amos Gilat
Publisher:
John Wiley & Sons Inc
Probability and Statistics for Engineering and th…
Probability and Statistics for Engineering and th…
Statistics
ISBN:
9781305251809
Author:
Jay L. Devore
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Statistics for The Behavioral Sciences (MindTap C…
Statistics for The Behavioral Sciences (MindTap C…
Statistics
ISBN:
9781305504912
Author:
Frederick J Gravetter, Larry B. Wallnau
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Elementary Statistics: Picturing the World (7th E…
Elementary Statistics: Picturing the World (7th E…
Statistics
ISBN:
9780134683416
Author:
Ron Larson, Betsy Farber
Publisher:
PEARSON
The Basic Practice of Statistics
The Basic Practice of Statistics
Statistics
ISBN:
9781319042578
Author:
David S. Moore, William I. Notz, Michael A. Fligner
Publisher:
W. H. Freeman
Introduction to the Practice of Statistics
Introduction to the Practice of Statistics
Statistics
ISBN:
9781319013387
Author:
David S. Moore, George P. McCabe, Bruce A. Craig
Publisher:
W. H. Freeman