As you know, given z e C, z + 0, then z1/2 is a set containing two distinct elements, so that the formula f(z) = z1/² does not define a function. A way to define the complex square root as a function (actually, to define many complex square roots) is the following. Given z E C denote by |2| its modulus and (when z + 0) by Arg(z) the principal value of its argument (so that Arg(z) E (–1, 7]). Define a function f(z) by setting f(0) = 0, f(2) = Vlzle*Arg(=)/2 if z +0, and then define a function g(z) by setting 9(2) = -Vlz|e* Arg(=)/2 if z + 0. g(0) = 0, (i) Check that f(1) = 1 while g(1) = –1, so that f and g are different functions. = z and g(z)² = z for every z E C, so that both functions would have the right to be called complex square root. The fact that there is more than one complex square root leads to call f(2) and g(z) branches of the complex square root. (iii) The restriction of f(z) to the unit circle {eit :t e (-n, 7]} defines a function p(t) = f(et) of the real variable t e (–n, T] with complex values. Show that lim e(t) = –i, t→(-n)+ lim φ(t) = i. t→Tー Do you think that lim f(2) z--1 exists? Why?
As you know, given z e C, z + 0, then z1/2 is a set containing two distinct elements, so that the formula f(z) = z1/² does not define a function. A way to define the complex square root as a function (actually, to define many complex square roots) is the following. Given z E C denote by |2| its modulus and (when z + 0) by Arg(z) the principal value of its argument (so that Arg(z) E (–1, 7]). Define a function f(z) by setting f(0) = 0, f(2) = Vlzle*Arg(=)/2 if z +0, and then define a function g(z) by setting 9(2) = -Vlz|e* Arg(=)/2 if z + 0. g(0) = 0, (i) Check that f(1) = 1 while g(1) = –1, so that f and g are different functions. = z and g(z)² = z for every z E C, so that both functions would have the right to be called complex square root. The fact that there is more than one complex square root leads to call f(2) and g(z) branches of the complex square root. (iii) The restriction of f(z) to the unit circle {eit :t e (-n, 7]} defines a function p(t) = f(et) of the real variable t e (–n, T] with complex values. Show that lim e(t) = –i, t→(-n)+ lim φ(t) = i. t→Tー Do you think that lim f(2) z--1 exists? Why?
Advanced Engineering Mathematics
10th Edition
ISBN:9780470458365
Author:Erwin Kreyszig
Publisher:Erwin Kreyszig
Chapter2: Second-order Linear Odes
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1RQ
Related questions
Topic Video
Question
100%
Could you explain how to do this in detail?
Expert Solution
This question has been solved!
Explore an expertly crafted, step-by-step solution for a thorough understanding of key concepts.
Step by step
Solved in 3 steps with 3 images
Knowledge Booster
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, advanced-math and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.Recommended textbooks for you
Advanced Engineering Mathematics
Advanced Math
ISBN:
9780470458365
Author:
Erwin Kreyszig
Publisher:
Wiley, John & Sons, Incorporated
Numerical Methods for Engineers
Advanced Math
ISBN:
9780073397924
Author:
Steven C. Chapra Dr., Raymond P. Canale
Publisher:
McGraw-Hill Education
Introductory Mathematics for Engineering Applicat…
Advanced Math
ISBN:
9781118141809
Author:
Nathan Klingbeil
Publisher:
WILEY
Advanced Engineering Mathematics
Advanced Math
ISBN:
9780470458365
Author:
Erwin Kreyszig
Publisher:
Wiley, John & Sons, Incorporated
Numerical Methods for Engineers
Advanced Math
ISBN:
9780073397924
Author:
Steven C. Chapra Dr., Raymond P. Canale
Publisher:
McGraw-Hill Education
Introductory Mathematics for Engineering Applicat…
Advanced Math
ISBN:
9781118141809
Author:
Nathan Klingbeil
Publisher:
WILEY
Mathematics For Machine Technology
Advanced Math
ISBN:
9781337798310
Author:
Peterson, John.
Publisher:
Cengage Learning,