As part of a study designed to compare hybrid and similarly equipped conventional vehicles, a variety of classes of hybrid and all-gas model cars and sport utility vehicles (SUVS) were tested. The data showing the miles- gallon rating study obtained for two hybrid small cars, two hybrid midsize cars, two hybrid small SUVS, two hybrid midsize SUVS, and eight similarly equipped conventional models are contained in the Excel Online file belo Construct a spreadsheet to answer the following questions.

MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
6th Edition
ISBN:9781119256830
Author:Amos Gilat
Publisher:Amos Gilat
Chapter1: Starting With Matlab
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1P
icon
Related questions
Question

Trying to find the answers to the x's

A
B
D
E
F
G
H
K
L.
M
Q
R
U
V
Make/Model
Class
MPG
Rearrange the data for the Anova: Two-Factor With Replication Analysis
Туре
Hybrid
Conventional
1
2
Honda Civic
Small Car
36
Honda Civic
Small Car
Small Car
3
27
Hybrid
Conventional
Hybrid
Conventional
Hybrid
Conventional
4 Toyota Prius
Toyota Corolla
45
Small Car
Small Car
33
6
Chevrolet Malibu
Midsize Car
28
Midsize Car
7
Chevrolet Malibu
Midsize Car
24
8
Nissan Altima
Midsize Car
Hybrid
33
Small SUV
9
Nissan Altima
Midsize Car
Conventional
24
10 Ford Escape
Ford Escape
Small SUV
Hybrid
27
Midsize SUV
Small SUV
Small SUV
Conventional
20
11
12 Saturn Vue
13 Saturn Vue
Hybrid
28
Small SUV
Conventional
22
14 Lexus RX
Midsize SUV Hybrid
22
After reading these instructions delete all text in this shaded area.
15 Lexus RX
16 Toyota Highlander
17 Toyota Highlander
Midsize SUV Conventional
19
Midsize SUV Hybrid
25
Use the XLMiner Analysis ToolPak to conduct your Anova: Two-Factor With Replication analysis.
Midsize SUV Conventional
19
After deleting all text in this shaded area, set the output range in the ToolPak to the top left cell
of this area (F14).
18
19
20
21
Your Anova analysis output should fit into this shaded area.
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
Transcribed Image Text:A B D E F G H K L. M Q R U V Make/Model Class MPG Rearrange the data for the Anova: Two-Factor With Replication Analysis Туре Hybrid Conventional 1 2 Honda Civic Small Car 36 Honda Civic Small Car Small Car 3 27 Hybrid Conventional Hybrid Conventional Hybrid Conventional 4 Toyota Prius Toyota Corolla 45 Small Car Small Car 33 6 Chevrolet Malibu Midsize Car 28 Midsize Car 7 Chevrolet Malibu Midsize Car 24 8 Nissan Altima Midsize Car Hybrid 33 Small SUV 9 Nissan Altima Midsize Car Conventional 24 10 Ford Escape Ford Escape Small SUV Hybrid 27 Midsize SUV Small SUV Small SUV Conventional 20 11 12 Saturn Vue 13 Saturn Vue Hybrid 28 Small SUV Conventional 22 14 Lexus RX Midsize SUV Hybrid 22 After reading these instructions delete all text in this shaded area. 15 Lexus RX 16 Toyota Highlander 17 Toyota Highlander Midsize SUV Conventional 19 Midsize SUV Hybrid 25 Use the XLMiner Analysis ToolPak to conduct your Anova: Two-Factor With Replication analysis. Midsize SUV Conventional 19 After deleting all text in this shaded area, set the output range in the ToolPak to the top left cell of this area (F14). 18 19 20 21 Your Anova analysis output should fit into this shaded area. 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40
E Video
As part of a study designed to compare hybrid and similarly equipped conventional vehicles, a variety of classes of hybrid and all-gas model cars and sport utility vehicles (SUVS) were tested. The data showing the miles-per-
gallon rating study obtained for two hybrid small cars, two hybrid midsize cars, two hybrid small SUVS, two hybrid midsize SUVS, and eight similarly equipped conventional models are contained in the Excel Online file below.
Construct a spreadsheet to answer the following questions.
Open spreadsheet
a. At the a = .05 level of significance, test for significant effects due to class, type, and interaction.
Source
of Variation
Sum of Squares
(to 2 decimals)
Degrees
of Freedom
Mean Square
(to 2 decimals)
(to 2 decimals)
Class
458.75
3
152.92
17.48
Туре
169
169.00
19.31
Interaction
14
3
4.67
0.53
Error
70
8
8.75
Total
711.75
15
b. The p-value for the class of vehicle is 0.0023
What is your conclusion with respect to the class of vehicle?
There is sufficient
vO evidence to conclude that the fuel efficiency is not the same for the four classes of vehicle.
c. The p-value for the type of vehicle is o.0007 8
What is your conclusion with respect to the type of vehicle?
There is sufficient
V evidence to conclude that the fuel efficiency is not the same for the two types of vehicle.
d. The p-value for the interaction between class and type of vehicle is 0.6722
What is your conclusion with respect to the interaction between class and type of vehicle?
The interaction between type and class of vehicle is not
O statistically significant.
Check My Work
Reset Problem
Autosaved at 8:51 PM
Back
Next
Transcribed Image Text:E Video As part of a study designed to compare hybrid and similarly equipped conventional vehicles, a variety of classes of hybrid and all-gas model cars and sport utility vehicles (SUVS) were tested. The data showing the miles-per- gallon rating study obtained for two hybrid small cars, two hybrid midsize cars, two hybrid small SUVS, two hybrid midsize SUVS, and eight similarly equipped conventional models are contained in the Excel Online file below. Construct a spreadsheet to answer the following questions. Open spreadsheet a. At the a = .05 level of significance, test for significant effects due to class, type, and interaction. Source of Variation Sum of Squares (to 2 decimals) Degrees of Freedom Mean Square (to 2 decimals) (to 2 decimals) Class 458.75 3 152.92 17.48 Туре 169 169.00 19.31 Interaction 14 3 4.67 0.53 Error 70 8 8.75 Total 711.75 15 b. The p-value for the class of vehicle is 0.0023 What is your conclusion with respect to the class of vehicle? There is sufficient vO evidence to conclude that the fuel efficiency is not the same for the four classes of vehicle. c. The p-value for the type of vehicle is o.0007 8 What is your conclusion with respect to the type of vehicle? There is sufficient V evidence to conclude that the fuel efficiency is not the same for the two types of vehicle. d. The p-value for the interaction between class and type of vehicle is 0.6722 What is your conclusion with respect to the interaction between class and type of vehicle? The interaction between type and class of vehicle is not O statistically significant. Check My Work Reset Problem Autosaved at 8:51 PM Back Next
Expert Solution
steps

Step by step

Solved in 3 steps with 1 images

Blurred answer
Knowledge Booster
Law of Cosines
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, statistics and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.
Recommended textbooks for you
MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
Statistics
ISBN:
9781119256830
Author:
Amos Gilat
Publisher:
John Wiley & Sons Inc
Probability and Statistics for Engineering and th…
Probability and Statistics for Engineering and th…
Statistics
ISBN:
9781305251809
Author:
Jay L. Devore
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Statistics for The Behavioral Sciences (MindTap C…
Statistics for The Behavioral Sciences (MindTap C…
Statistics
ISBN:
9781305504912
Author:
Frederick J Gravetter, Larry B. Wallnau
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Elementary Statistics: Picturing the World (7th E…
Elementary Statistics: Picturing the World (7th E…
Statistics
ISBN:
9780134683416
Author:
Ron Larson, Betsy Farber
Publisher:
PEARSON
The Basic Practice of Statistics
The Basic Practice of Statistics
Statistics
ISBN:
9781319042578
Author:
David S. Moore, William I. Notz, Michael A. Fligner
Publisher:
W. H. Freeman
Introduction to the Practice of Statistics
Introduction to the Practice of Statistics
Statistics
ISBN:
9781319013387
Author:
David S. Moore, George P. McCabe, Bruce A. Craig
Publisher:
W. H. Freeman