As a programmer in the industry, you may develop software that could affect people's health or even their lives. Suppose a software bug in one of your programs were to cause a cancer patient to receive an excessive dose during radiation therapy and that the person is either severely injured or dies. Given the scenario above, post your thoughts on the importance of software testing. Consider the following questions while writing your post: The scenario gives a very high stakes application of programming errors, do you believe the amount of testing a piece of software goes through should be relative to the nature of the software? (i.e. critical systems such as the one in the scenario should have more testing and non-critical software should have less). Should the cost in money and resources be considered when deciding on how much testing software should undergo? Do developers have an ethical obligation to test the software before it is released? In addition to responding to the prompt, search online for a news article or post for another example where a software bug or flaw created a problem for users of the software. Summarize the article and explain whether you think more rigorous testing would have been justified to prevent or mitigate the issue.

Database System Concepts

7th Edition

ISBN:9780078022159

Author:Abraham Silberschatz Professor, Henry F. Korth, S. Sudarshan

Publisher:Abraham Silberschatz Professor, Henry F. Korth, S. Sudarshan

Chapter1: Introduction

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1PE

See similar textbooks

Related questions

Concept explainers

Question

As a programmer in the industry, you may develop software that could affect people's health or even their lives. Suppose a software bug in one of your programs were to cause a cancer patient to receive an excessive dose during radiation therapy and that the person is either severely injured or dies.
Given the scenario above, post your thoughts on the importance of software testing. Consider the following questions while writing your post:
- The scenario gives a very high stakes application of programming errors, do you believe the amount of testing a piece of software goes through should be relative to the nature of the software? (i.e. critical systems such as the one in the scenario should have more testing and non-critical software should have less).
- Should the cost in money and resources be considered when deciding on how much testing software should undergo?
- Do developers have an ethical obligation to test the software before it is released?
In addition to responding to the prompt, search online for a news article or post for another example where a software bug or flaw created a problem for users of the software. Summarize the article and explain whether you think more rigorous testing would have been justified to prevent or mitigate the issue.

Expert Solution

Trending now

This is a popular solution!

Step by step

Solved in 2 steps

SEE SOLUTION Check out a sample Q&A here

Knowledge Booster

Learn more about

Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, computer-science and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.

Similar questions