Are job applicants with easy to pronounce last names less likely to get called for an interview than applicants with difficult to pronounce last names. 615 job applications were sent out with last names that are easy to pronounce and 820 identical job applications were sent out with names that were difficult to pronounce. 456 of the "applicants" with easy to pronounce names were called for an interview while 633 of the "applicants" with difficult to pronounce names were called for an interview. What can be concluded at the 0.01 level of significance? For this study, we should use Select an answer a. The null and alternative hypotheses would be: Ho: Select an answer Select an answer Select an answer (please enter a decimal) Hị: Select an answer V Select an answer v Select an answer | (Please enter a decimal) b. The test statistic ? (please show your answer to 3 decimal places.) c. The p-value = d. The p-value is 2v a (Please show your answer to 4 decimal places.) e. Based on this, we should Select an answer | the null hypothesis. f. Thus, the final conclusion is that .. O The results are statistically insignificant at a = 0.01, so there is insufficient evidence to conclude that applicants with easy to pronounce last names are less likely to get called for an interview compared to applicants with difficult to pronounce last names. O The results are statistically significant at a = 0.01, so there is sufficient evidence to conclude that the proportion of the 615 applicants with easy to pronounce names who got called for an interview is less than the proportion of the 820 applicants with difficult to pronounce names who got called for an interview. O The results are statistically insignificant at a = 0.01, so we can conclude that the population proportion of applicants with easy to pronounce names who get called for an interview is equal to the population proportion of applicants with difficult to pronounce names who get called for an interview. O The results are statistically significant at a = 0.01, so there is sufficient evidence to conclude that among all possible applicants, people with easy to pronounce last names are less likely to get called for an interview compared to people with difficult to pronounce last names. g. Interpret the p-value in the context of the study.

MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
6th Edition
ISBN:9781119256830
Author:Amos Gilat
Publisher:Amos Gilat
Chapter1: Starting With Matlab
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1P
icon
Related questions
Topic Video
Question

Please do only B,C, F 

Are job applicants with easy to pronounce last names less likely to get called for an interview than
applicants with difficult to pronounce last names. 615 job applications were sent out with last names that
are easy to pronounce and 820 identical job applications were sent out with names that were difficult to
pronounce. 456 of the "applicants" with easy to pronounce names were called for an interview while 633 of
the "applicants" with difficult to pronounce names were called for an interview. What can be concluded at
the 0.01 level of significance?
For this study, we should use Select an answer
a. The null and alternative hypotheses would be:
Họ: Select an answer
Select an answer
Select an answer
(please enter a decimal)
H: Select an answer
Select an answer
Select an answer
(Please enter a decimal)
b. The test statistic ?
(please show your answer to 3 decimal places.)
=
c. The p-value =
(Please show your answer to 4 decimal places.)
d. The p-value is ?v a
e. Based on this, we should Select an answer
) the null hypothesis.
f. Thus, the final conclusion is that ...
O The results are statistically insignificant at a = 0.01, so there is insufficient evidence to
conclude that applicants with easy to pronounce last names are less likely to get called for an
interview compared to applicants with difficult to pronounce last names.
O The results are statistically significant at a = 0.01, so there is sufficient evidence to conclude
that the proportion of the 615 applicants with easy to pronounce names who got called for an
interview is less than the proportion of the 820 applicants with difficult to pronounce names
who got called for an interview.
O The results are statistically insignificant at a = 0.01, so we can conclude that the population
proportion of applicants with easy to pronounce names who get called for an interview is equal
to the population proportion of applicants with difficult to pronounce names who get called for
an interview.
The results are statistically significant at a = 0.01, so there is sufficient evidence to conclude
that among all possible applicants, people with easy to pronounce last names are less likely to
get called for an interview compared to people with difficult to pronounce last names.
g. Interpret the p-value in the context of the study.
Transcribed Image Text:Are job applicants with easy to pronounce last names less likely to get called for an interview than applicants with difficult to pronounce last names. 615 job applications were sent out with last names that are easy to pronounce and 820 identical job applications were sent out with names that were difficult to pronounce. 456 of the "applicants" with easy to pronounce names were called for an interview while 633 of the "applicants" with difficult to pronounce names were called for an interview. What can be concluded at the 0.01 level of significance? For this study, we should use Select an answer a. The null and alternative hypotheses would be: Họ: Select an answer Select an answer Select an answer (please enter a decimal) H: Select an answer Select an answer Select an answer (Please enter a decimal) b. The test statistic ? (please show your answer to 3 decimal places.) = c. The p-value = (Please show your answer to 4 decimal places.) d. The p-value is ?v a e. Based on this, we should Select an answer ) the null hypothesis. f. Thus, the final conclusion is that ... O The results are statistically insignificant at a = 0.01, so there is insufficient evidence to conclude that applicants with easy to pronounce last names are less likely to get called for an interview compared to applicants with difficult to pronounce last names. O The results are statistically significant at a = 0.01, so there is sufficient evidence to conclude that the proportion of the 615 applicants with easy to pronounce names who got called for an interview is less than the proportion of the 820 applicants with difficult to pronounce names who got called for an interview. O The results are statistically insignificant at a = 0.01, so we can conclude that the population proportion of applicants with easy to pronounce names who get called for an interview is equal to the population proportion of applicants with difficult to pronounce names who get called for an interview. The results are statistically significant at a = 0.01, so there is sufficient evidence to conclude that among all possible applicants, people with easy to pronounce last names are less likely to get called for an interview compared to people with difficult to pronounce last names. g. Interpret the p-value in the context of the study.
Expert Solution
trending now

Trending now

This is a popular solution!

steps

Step by step

Solved in 6 steps

Blurred answer
Knowledge Booster
Propositional Calculus
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, statistics and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.
Recommended textbooks for you
MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
Statistics
ISBN:
9781119256830
Author:
Amos Gilat
Publisher:
John Wiley & Sons Inc
Probability and Statistics for Engineering and th…
Probability and Statistics for Engineering and th…
Statistics
ISBN:
9781305251809
Author:
Jay L. Devore
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Statistics for The Behavioral Sciences (MindTap C…
Statistics for The Behavioral Sciences (MindTap C…
Statistics
ISBN:
9781305504912
Author:
Frederick J Gravetter, Larry B. Wallnau
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Elementary Statistics: Picturing the World (7th E…
Elementary Statistics: Picturing the World (7th E…
Statistics
ISBN:
9780134683416
Author:
Ron Larson, Betsy Farber
Publisher:
PEARSON
The Basic Practice of Statistics
The Basic Practice of Statistics
Statistics
ISBN:
9781319042578
Author:
David S. Moore, William I. Notz, Michael A. Fligner
Publisher:
W. H. Freeman
Introduction to the Practice of Statistics
Introduction to the Practice of Statistics
Statistics
ISBN:
9781319013387
Author:
David S. Moore, George P. McCabe, Bruce A. Craig
Publisher:
W. H. Freeman