Aqueus is a classic monopolist earning positive economic profits. (a) Draw a graph of Aqueus, labeling the profit-maximizing price PM, the profit-maximizing quantity QM, and the allocatively efficient quantity Qso. Shade the area of deadweight loss. (b) If Aqueus is earning economic profits, why would other firms not enter the market? Explain. (c) The government sets an effective price ceiling. On your graph from part (a), label this price PR and the new output quantity QR. (d) After the change in part (c), Aqueus's total revenue is $40 million. If the output quantity is now 5 million units, what must be the value of PR? (e) If ATC at QR is $5, what is the economic profit or loss with the government intervention? (f) How would the government action in part (c) affect the deadweight loss in Aqueus's market? (g) Why might the government prefer to use antitrust policy to regulate Aqueus in the long run? Explain. (h) Gaiana is a small firm that sells a complementary good to Aqueus's product in a perfectly competitive market. Assuming Gaiana was in long-run equilibrium, illustrate the short-run effect of the government intervention from part (e) on Gaiana supply and demand in a separate graph. If Gaiana earns any economic profit or loss, shade it. (i) Assume that Gaiana operates in a constant-cost industry. What would happen to Gaiana's firm supply and demand in the long run? Explain.
Aqueus is a classic monopolist earning positive economic profits. (a) Draw a graph of Aqueus, labeling the profit-maximizing price PM, the profit-maximizing quantity QM, and the allocatively efficient quantity Qso. Shade the area of deadweight loss. (b) If Aqueus is earning economic profits, why would other firms not enter the market? Explain. (c) The government sets an effective price ceiling. On your graph from part (a), label this price PR and the new output quantity QR. (d) After the change in part (c), Aqueus's total revenue is $40 million. If the output quantity is now 5 million units, what must be the value of PR? (e) If ATC at QR is $5, what is the economic profit or loss with the government intervention? (f) How would the government action in part (c) affect the deadweight loss in Aqueus's market? (g) Why might the government prefer to use antitrust policy to regulate Aqueus in the long run? Explain. (h) Gaiana is a small firm that sells a complementary good to Aqueus's product in a perfectly competitive market. Assuming Gaiana was in long-run equilibrium, illustrate the short-run effect of the government intervention from part (e) on Gaiana supply and demand in a separate graph. If Gaiana earns any economic profit or loss, shade it. (i) Assume that Gaiana operates in a constant-cost industry. What would happen to Gaiana's firm supply and demand in the long run? Explain.
Chapter6: Systems Of Equations And Inequalities
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 21T: A manufacturer produces two models of television stands. The table at the left shows the times (in...
Related questions
Question
Answer all parts please and please make graphs hand drwan thank you.
Transcribed Image Text:Aqueus is a classic monopolist earning positive economic profits.
(a) Draw a graph of Aqueus, labeling the profit-maximizing price PM, the profit-maximizing quantity QM,
and the allocatively efficient quantity Qso. Shade the area of deadweight loss.
(b) If Aqueus is earning economic profits, why would other firms not enter the market? Explain.
(c) The government sets an effective price ceiling. On your graph from part (a), label this price PR and the
new output quantity QR.
(d) After the change in part (c), Aqueus's total revenue is $40 million. If the output quantity is now 5 million
units, what must be the value of PR?
(e) If ATC at QR is $5, what is the economic profit or loss with the government intervention?
(f) How would the government action in part (c) affect the deadweight loss in Aqueus's market?
(g) Why might the government prefer to use antitrust policy to regulate Aqueus in the long run? Explain.
(h) Gaiana is a small firm that sells a complementary good to Aqueus's product in a perfectly competitive
market. Assuming Gaiana was in long-run equilibrium, illustrate the short-run effect of the government
intervention from part (e) on Gaiana supply and demand in a separate graph. If Gaiana earns any economic
profit or loss, shade it.
(i) Assume that Gaiana operates in a constant-cost industry. What would happen to Gaiana's firm supply
and demand in the long run? Explain.
Expert Solution
This question has been solved!
Explore an expertly crafted, step-by-step solution for a thorough understanding of key concepts.
Step by step
Solved in 2 steps with 2 images
Recommended textbooks for you
Algebra & Trigonometry with Analytic Geometry
Algebra
ISBN:
9781133382119
Author:
Swokowski
Publisher:
Cengage
College Algebra (MindTap Course List)
Algebra
ISBN:
9781305652231
Author:
R. David Gustafson, Jeff Hughes
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Algebra & Trigonometry with Analytic Geometry
Algebra
ISBN:
9781133382119
Author:
Swokowski
Publisher:
Cengage
College Algebra (MindTap Course List)
Algebra
ISBN:
9781305652231
Author:
R. David Gustafson, Jeff Hughes
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Glencoe Algebra 1, Student Edition, 9780079039897…
Algebra
ISBN:
9780079039897
Author:
Carter
Publisher:
McGraw Hill
Elementary Linear Algebra (MindTap Course List)
Algebra
ISBN:
9781305658004
Author:
Ron Larson
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Linear Algebra: A Modern Introduction
Algebra
ISBN:
9781285463247
Author:
David Poole
Publisher:
Cengage Learning