APPENDIX 3 The following analysis looks at the quality of living conditions among families living in 3 major c in Thaland In this analysis, quality of living conditions (gols ord-o if low standard of living. 1 if medium, 2 high standard of living) was examined as the response with the following predictors: 12 years Father's Education: feduct 8 if <-8 years of education, 11 it9-11 years, 12 Mother's Education: meduc1-8 if c-8 years of education, 11 if 9-11 years, 12 if-12 years Country where mother was born: countryBorn-1 if Thailand; 2 if Burma Read and write in Thai: readwrite-1 if yes, 0 if no Income: in 10,000 Bhat. So, a value of 9 would indicate the family's income was 90,000 Bhat. SAS Output is given below. Data Set The LOGISTIC Procedure Model Information Response Variable WORK QOLS gols ord cumulative logit Number of Response Levels) Model Optimization Technique Fisher's scoring Number of Observations Read320 Number of Observations Used275 Response Profile Valueqols_ord Frequency Ordered 12 21 30 Total 98 87 Probabilities modeled are cumulated over the lower Ordered Values. Note: 45 observations were deleted due to missing values for the response or explanatory variables Class feducl Class Level Information Value Design Variables 8 11 0 12 0 1 meducl 8 0 0 11 1 0 12 0 1 country Bom 1 readwrite Model Convergence Status Convergence criterion (GCONV-11-8) satisfied. Score Test for the Proportional Odds Assumption Chi-Square DF Pr> Chiq 8.6237 7 0.2808 Model Fit Statistics Criterion Intercept Only Intercept and Covariates AIC SC -2 Log L 607.537 614.770 603.537 579.436 611.987 561.436 Testing Global Null Hypothesis: BETA-0 Test Chi-Square DF Pr> ChiSq Likelihood Ratio 42.1006 7 <.0001 Score 36.8569 7 <.0001 Wald 37.1203 7 <.0001 Effect feduel Type 3 Analysis of Effects Wald DF Chi-Square Pr> ChiSq 2 4.9680 0.0834 meduc1 2 0.0485 0.9760 country Born 1 10.3629 0.0013 readwrite Income 1 7.6497 0.0057 17.6500 <.0001 Analysis of Maximum Likelihood Estimates Standard Parameter DFEstimate Error Chi-Square Pr> ChiSq Intercept 2 1-2.9119 0.4847 36.0875 <.0001 Intercept 1 1-1.4323 0.4618 9.6213 0.0019 feduc1 0.0593 0.8077 3.8229 0.0506 0.8456 111 0.0807 0.3316 feduc1 12 1 0.6796 0.3476 meduc 11 1-0.0734 0.3771 meducl 12 1 -0.0227 0.3863 country Born2 readwrite 1 Income 0.0379 0.0035 0.9531 10.3629 0.0013 1 1.6156 0.5019 1 1.3890 0.5022 7.6497 0.0057 1 0.6291 0.1497 17.6500 <.0001 Odds Ratio Estimates 95% Wald Effect feduc1 11 vs 8 feducl 12 vs 8 meducl 11 vs 8 meduc1 12 vs 8 country Born 2 vs 1 readwrite 1 vs 2 Income Point Estimate Confidence Limits 1.084 0.566 2.077 1.973 0.998 3.899 0.929 0.444 0.978 0.458 2.084 5.031 1.881 13.454 4.011 1.499 10.733 2.516 1.876 1.399 Association of Predicted Probabilities and Observed Responses Percent Concordant 68.6Somers' D0.383 Percent Discordant 30.3Gamma 0.387 Percent Tied Pairs 1.1 Tau-a 0.256 25176c 0.692 812 9

Advanced Engineering Mathematics
10th Edition
ISBN:9780470458365
Author:Erwin Kreyszig
Publisher:Erwin Kreyszig
Chapter2: Second-order Linear Odes
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1RQ
icon
Related questions
Question
Calculate the odds ratio of improved quality of living conditions given the father had at least a high school degree (years of education=12) versus had some high school (>8, but less than 12 years). Give your answer to three values after the decimal place. Show your calculation
APPENDIX 3
The following analysis looks at the quality of living conditions among families living in 3 major c
in Thaland
In this analysis, quality of living conditions (gols ord-o if low standard of living. 1 if medium, 2
high standard of living) was examined as the response with the following predictors:
12 years
Father's Education: feduct 8 if <-8 years of education, 11 it9-11 years, 12
Mother's Education: meduc1-8 if c-8 years of education, 11 if 9-11 years, 12 if-12 years
Country where mother was born: countryBorn-1 if Thailand; 2 if Burma
Read and write in Thai: readwrite-1 if yes, 0 if no
Income: in 10,000 Bhat. So, a value of 9 would indicate the family's income was 90,000
Bhat.
SAS Output is given below.
Data Set
The LOGISTIC Procedure
Model Information
Response Variable
WORK QOLS
gols ord
cumulative logit
Number of Response Levels)
Model
Optimization Technique Fisher's scoring
Number of Observations Read320
Number of Observations Used275
Response Profile
Valueqols_ord Frequency
Ordered
12
21
30
Total
98
87
Probabilities modeled are cumulated over the lower Ordered Values.
Note: 45 observations were deleted due to missing values for the response or explanatory variables
Class
feducl
Class Level Information
Value Design Variables
8
11
0
12
0
1
meducl
8
0
0
11
1
0
12
0
1
country Bom 1
readwrite
Model Convergence Status
Convergence criterion (GCONV-11-8) satisfied.
Score Test for the Proportional
Odds Assumption
Chi-Square DF Pr> Chiq
8.6237 7
0.2808
Model Fit Statistics
Criterion Intercept Only Intercept and Covariates
AIC
SC
-2 Log L
607.537
614.770
603.537
579.436
611.987
561.436
Testing Global Null Hypothesis: BETA-0
Test
Chi-Square DF Pr> ChiSq
Likelihood Ratio
42.1006 7 <.0001
Score
36.8569 7 <.0001
Wald
37.1203 7 <.0001
Effect
feduel
Type 3 Analysis of Effects
Wald
DF Chi-Square Pr> ChiSq
2 4.9680 0.0834
meduc1
2
0.0485
0.9760
country Born 1
10.3629
0.0013
readwrite
Income
1 7.6497 0.0057
17.6500 <.0001
Analysis of Maximum Likelihood Estimates
Standard
Parameter DFEstimate Error Chi-Square Pr> ChiSq
Intercept 2 1-2.9119 0.4847
36.0875 <.0001
Intercept 1 1-1.4323 0.4618
9.6213 0.0019
feduc1
0.0593 0.8077
3.8229 0.0506
0.8456
111 0.0807 0.3316
feduc1 12 1 0.6796 0.3476
meduc 11 1-0.0734 0.3771
meducl 12 1 -0.0227 0.3863
country Born2
readwrite 1
Income
0.0379
0.0035 0.9531
10.3629 0.0013
1 1.6156 0.5019
1 1.3890 0.5022
7.6497 0.0057
1 0.6291 0.1497 17.6500
<.0001
Odds Ratio Estimates
95% Wald
Effect
feduc1 11 vs 8
feducl 12 vs 8
meducl 11 vs 8
meduc1 12 vs 8
country Born 2 vs 1
readwrite 1 vs 2
Income
Point Estimate Confidence Limits
1.084 0.566 2.077
1.973 0.998
3.899
0.929 0.444
0.978 0.458 2.084
5.031 1.881 13.454
4.011 1.499 10.733
2.516
1.876 1.399
Association of Predicted Probabilities and
Observed Responses
Percent Concordant 68.6Somers' D0.383
Percent Discordant 30.3Gamma 0.387
Percent Tied
Pairs
1.1 Tau-a
0.256
25176c
0.692
812 9
Transcribed Image Text:APPENDIX 3 The following analysis looks at the quality of living conditions among families living in 3 major c in Thaland In this analysis, quality of living conditions (gols ord-o if low standard of living. 1 if medium, 2 high standard of living) was examined as the response with the following predictors: 12 years Father's Education: feduct 8 if <-8 years of education, 11 it9-11 years, 12 Mother's Education: meduc1-8 if c-8 years of education, 11 if 9-11 years, 12 if-12 years Country where mother was born: countryBorn-1 if Thailand; 2 if Burma Read and write in Thai: readwrite-1 if yes, 0 if no Income: in 10,000 Bhat. So, a value of 9 would indicate the family's income was 90,000 Bhat. SAS Output is given below. Data Set The LOGISTIC Procedure Model Information Response Variable WORK QOLS gols ord cumulative logit Number of Response Levels) Model Optimization Technique Fisher's scoring Number of Observations Read320 Number of Observations Used275 Response Profile Valueqols_ord Frequency Ordered 12 21 30 Total 98 87 Probabilities modeled are cumulated over the lower Ordered Values. Note: 45 observations were deleted due to missing values for the response or explanatory variables Class feducl Class Level Information Value Design Variables 8 11 0 12 0 1 meducl 8 0 0 11 1 0 12 0 1 country Bom 1 readwrite Model Convergence Status Convergence criterion (GCONV-11-8) satisfied. Score Test for the Proportional Odds Assumption Chi-Square DF Pr> Chiq 8.6237 7 0.2808 Model Fit Statistics Criterion Intercept Only Intercept and Covariates AIC SC -2 Log L 607.537 614.770 603.537 579.436 611.987 561.436 Testing Global Null Hypothesis: BETA-0 Test Chi-Square DF Pr> ChiSq Likelihood Ratio 42.1006 7 <.0001 Score 36.8569 7 <.0001 Wald 37.1203 7 <.0001 Effect feduel Type 3 Analysis of Effects Wald DF Chi-Square Pr> ChiSq 2 4.9680 0.0834 meduc1 2 0.0485 0.9760 country Born 1 10.3629 0.0013 readwrite Income 1 7.6497 0.0057 17.6500 <.0001 Analysis of Maximum Likelihood Estimates Standard Parameter DFEstimate Error Chi-Square Pr> ChiSq Intercept 2 1-2.9119 0.4847 36.0875 <.0001 Intercept 1 1-1.4323 0.4618 9.6213 0.0019 feduc1 0.0593 0.8077 3.8229 0.0506 0.8456 111 0.0807 0.3316 feduc1 12 1 0.6796 0.3476 meduc 11 1-0.0734 0.3771 meducl 12 1 -0.0227 0.3863 country Born2 readwrite 1 Income 0.0379 0.0035 0.9531 10.3629 0.0013 1 1.6156 0.5019 1 1.3890 0.5022 7.6497 0.0057 1 0.6291 0.1497 17.6500 <.0001 Odds Ratio Estimates 95% Wald Effect feduc1 11 vs 8 feducl 12 vs 8 meducl 11 vs 8 meduc1 12 vs 8 country Born 2 vs 1 readwrite 1 vs 2 Income Point Estimate Confidence Limits 1.084 0.566 2.077 1.973 0.998 3.899 0.929 0.444 0.978 0.458 2.084 5.031 1.881 13.454 4.011 1.499 10.733 2.516 1.876 1.399 Association of Predicted Probabilities and Observed Responses Percent Concordant 68.6Somers' D0.383 Percent Discordant 30.3Gamma 0.387 Percent Tied Pairs 1.1 Tau-a 0.256 25176c 0.692 812 9
Expert Solution
steps

Step by step

Solved in 2 steps

Blurred answer
Similar questions
Recommended textbooks for you
Advanced Engineering Mathematics
Advanced Engineering Mathematics
Advanced Math
ISBN:
9780470458365
Author:
Erwin Kreyszig
Publisher:
Wiley, John & Sons, Incorporated
Numerical Methods for Engineers
Numerical Methods for Engineers
Advanced Math
ISBN:
9780073397924
Author:
Steven C. Chapra Dr., Raymond P. Canale
Publisher:
McGraw-Hill Education
Introductory Mathematics for Engineering Applicat…
Introductory Mathematics for Engineering Applicat…
Advanced Math
ISBN:
9781118141809
Author:
Nathan Klingbeil
Publisher:
WILEY
Mathematics For Machine Technology
Mathematics For Machine Technology
Advanced Math
ISBN:
9781337798310
Author:
Peterson, John.
Publisher:
Cengage Learning,
Basic Technical Mathematics
Basic Technical Mathematics
Advanced Math
ISBN:
9780134437705
Author:
Washington
Publisher:
PEARSON
Topology
Topology
Advanced Math
ISBN:
9780134689517
Author:
Munkres, James R.
Publisher:
Pearson,