Anthony and Brandon have a utility possibility frontier that is given by the following equation: UA + 2U = 50. Anthony and Brandon believe that the ideal allocation is given by maximizing an appropriate social welfare function. Anthony thinks that UA = 30 and Ug = 100 is the best distribution of welfare, and presents the maximization solution to a weighted-sum-of-the-utilities social welfare function that confirms this observation. Anthony's social welfare function can be written as a) W = UA + UB b) W = UA + 10UB c) W = 10UA + UB

Anthony and Brandon have a utility possibility frontier that is given by the following equation: UA + 2U = 50. Anthony and Brandon believe that the ideal allocation is given by maximizing an appropriate social welfare function. Anthony thinks that UA = 30 and Ug = 100 is the best distribution of welfare, and presents the maximization solution to a weighted-sum-of-the-utilities social welfare function that confirms this observation. Anthony's social welfare function can be written as a) W = UA + UB b) W = UA + 10UB c) W = 10UA + UB

ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS

14th Edition

ISBN:9780190931919

Author:NEWNAN

Publisher:NEWNAN

Chapter1: Making Economics Decisions

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1QTC

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

(a) Examine the view that it is possible to escape from the "impossibility" result of Arrow by making social preferences a function of cardinal utility rather than of individual orderings.
Show using well labeled diagrams how you would derive the Marshallian Demand curve and compensated demand curve holding utility constant for an Inferior good X for a consumer maximizing her welfare subject to a budget constraint.
Graph make graph
Consider an economy with 100 pieces of apple (A) and 150 pieces of banana (B) that must be completely distributed to individuals 1 and 2. The utility function of the two individuals, U1 & U2, is given by U1 (A1,B1) = 2A2 + B2 & U2 (A2,B2) = 2A2B2, respectively. With this information, recommend an efficient allocation of the two goods between the two individuals. Discuss and show the necessary solution to support your recommendation
Part 1: Illustrate general equilibrium and the Laffer curve in the context of a repre- sentative consumer with a utility function: U(C.I) = In(C) + In() that he or she maximises subject to a constraint: C= w(1 – t)(h – 1) + * where w, h,1, C,t and a are wages, hours of time available, leisure, consumption, tax rate, and dividend income. The production function for this economy is given by Y = C+G = A(h - 1)/2 Assume that h = 1, A =1 and that the government has a balanced budget. (a) Find the equilibrium by matching the Marginal Rate of Substitution to the Marginal Rate of Transformation and then substitute into the constraint. Also take into account that profits are non-zero for this setup. (b) Plot the government tax revenue for 0
Extend the model of the jungle to the case in which the number of houses is smaller than the number of agents. In this case, an allocation is a function from the set of agents to the set H U {homeless} with the property that no two agents are assigned to the same house. Each agent has a preference ordering over H U {homeless}. Assume that this ordering is strict; assume also that every agent prefers to be allocated any house than to be homeless. Define an equilibrium for this extended model and show that it always exists.
Each day, Luke must decide his leisure hours, L, and his consumption, C. His utility function is given by the following equation U(L, C) = (C – 30)(L – 12). Luke receives $50 welfare payment per day. Show all the steps, with definition of every new notation used in the steps. a) Suppose that Luke's hourly wage is $5. Find Luke's daily budget constraint equation and graph it. b) If Luke's wage is $5 per hour worked, what is Luke's optimal consumption, (L*, C*)? · c) Assume that the wage is an unknown variable, w. What is Luke's leisure demand L(w)?- d) What is Luke's reservation wage, the lowest wage Luke is willing to work for? -
Two friends, Karol and Manuel, like to drink kombucha (x₁) and matcha (x₂). Both X₁ and X2 are expressed in ounces. The following utility function represents Karol's preferences: 1 1 2 2 u (x1, x2) = x1 x3 The following utility function represents Manuel's preferences: u (x₁, x2) = √√x1 + x2 Karol's income in dollars is denoted by mk, and Manuel's income is denoted by mm. Both face the same prices in the market, denoted by p₁ and p2, for kombucha and matcha, respectively. Both prices are expressed in dollars per ounce. Assume p₂=1 throughout the whole question. 1) Draw Karol's and Manuel's indifference curves in separate graphs and describe any important similarities or differences between the two.
Mrs. Griffiths earns $5000 a week and spends her entire income on dresses and handbags, since these are the only two items that provide her utility. Furthermore, Mrs. Griffiths insists that for every dress she buys, she must also buy a handbag. Draw an indifference curve showing the optimum choice. Label the optimum as point A. What would be the marginal rate of substitution at the point that corresponds to the optimal consumption choice? Interpret the marginal rate of substitution
6.
Consider an economy with 100 pieces of apple (A) and 150 pieces of banana (B) that must be completely distributed to individuals 1 and 2. The utility function of the two individuals, U, & U2, is given by U1 (A1,B1) = 2A? + B² & U2 (A2,B2) = 2A²B?, respectively. With this information, recommend an efficient allocation of the two %3D goods between the two individuals. Discuss and show the necessary solution to support your recommendation
In an environment in which all education is privately provided, suppose that a family with one child has $20,000 per year to spend on private goods and education. Draw this family’s budget constraint. Suppose now that an option of free public education with spending of $4,000 per pupil is introduced to this family. Draw three different indifference curves corresponding to the following three situations: (a) a free public education would increase the amount of money that is spent on the child’s education; (b) a free public education would decrease the amount of money that is spent on the child’s education; (c) a free public education would not affect the amount of money spent on the child’s education.