Answer the below in essay format: 1. A person’s character, values and beliefs are comprehensively termed ‘morality’. How is a person’s morality formed and how does one’s morality affect their ethical decision making?   2. Three (3) foundational perspectives of ethical thinking are Autonomous, Heteronomous and Theonomous. Carefully discuss these perspectives and why they are considered foundational to ethical thinking and an ethical school that has adopted each such thinking.

What are some ethical guidelines individuals and organizations can use to make ethical choices?

Can an individual be ethical without using ethical principles described in the chapter? Explain.

UserChoose one of Confucius's teachings and describe how that principle relates to the military ethical perspective.  Does it support your perspective or contrast with your perspective?  How does this principle compare to one of the other ethical perspectives covered in Chapter One (Utilitarianism, Altruism, etc.)?  Is it quite similar or quite different?

Explain the theories of Deontology, Utilitarianism and Consequentialism. Critically assess these ethical theories and develop a concise brief on your understanding of each one, citing which one of the three (3) you think is most applicable to modern day sport?

Assess the critical roles of ‘Relativism’ ethical theory for the interest of business professionals to have a good personal values and responsibilities towards making the right ethical decision.

Explain Four (4) keys components essential for any ethical decision making.

State and explain five critiques of each of the following ethical theoriesA. Utilitarianism (consequentialism)B. deontology ( rights and duties)C. Virtue ethics ( integrity and character)

Most of the ethical prescriptions of normative moral philosophy tend to fall into one of the following three categories: deontology, consequentialism, and virtue ethics. These categories in turn put an emphasis on different normative standards for judging what constitutes right and wrong actions. Moral psychologists and behavioral economists such as Jonathan Haidt and Dan Ariely take a different approach: focusing not on some normative ethical framework for moral judgment, but rather on the psychological foundations of moral intuition and on the limitations that our human frailty places on real-world honesty, decency, and ethical commitments. In this context, write on what you see as the most important differences between the traditional normative philosophical approaches and the more recent empirical approach of moral psychology when it comes to ethics. As part of your answer also make sure that you discuss the implications of these differences.

Does analyzing a moral problem from the perspective of the ethics of care sometimes yield a different result than that obtained by using either a Kantian or utilitarian standard