ange these steps in the correct order to prove that there are no solutions in integers x and y to the equation 2x2+5y2 = 14. Rank the options below. In the latter case to 2x² = 9. so, the only possible values of y to try are 0 and 11. If yl 22, then 2x2 +52 ≥ 2x2+20 220, so, there are no solutions to the original equation. In the former case, we would be looking for solutions to 2x² = 14. Clearly, there are no integer solutions to these equations,
ange these steps in the correct order to prove that there are no solutions in integers x and y to the equation 2x2+5y2 = 14. Rank the options below. In the latter case to 2x² = 9. so, the only possible values of y to try are 0 and 11. If yl 22, then 2x2 +52 ≥ 2x2+20 220, so, there are no solutions to the original equation. In the former case, we would be looking for solutions to 2x² = 14. Clearly, there are no integer solutions to these equations,
Advanced Engineering Mathematics
10th Edition
ISBN:9780470458365
Author:Erwin Kreyszig
Publisher:Erwin Kreyszig
Chapter2: Second-order Linear Odes
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1RQ
Related questions
Question
Please help me with this. I don't understand what to do

Transcribed Image Text:12: Secs 1.7-1.8 Ⓡ
Arrange these steps in the correct order to prove that there are no solutions in integers x and y to the equation 2x2 + 5₁2² = 14.
Rank the options below.
In the latter case to 2x² = 9.
so, the only possible values of y to try are 0 and ±1.
If (yl ≥ 2, then 2x² +5² ≥ 2x² + 20 ≥20,
so, there are no solutions to the original equation.
In the former case, we would be looking for solutions to 2x² = 14.
Clearly, there are no integer solutions to these equations,
Saved
< Prev
15 of 16
***
Next h
Help Save &

Transcribed Image Text:2: Secs 1.7-1.8
Put the steps in correct order to prove that 2 is irrational.
Barch
Rank the options below.
Substituting into the equation p3=2q³,853 = 2q3, which simplifies to 45³ =q³.
Hence, 2 =p³ / q³, or, equivalently, p3= 2q3. This is obtained by cubing on both sides.
Suppose that 21/3 or 2 2 is the rational number p/ q, where p and q are positive integers with no common factors.
Hence, the assumption that 2 √2 is rational is wrong. It is irrational.
Since q³ is even, q must be even. Hence, p and q are both even, that is, that 2 is a common divisor of p and q.
Thus p3 is even. Since the product of odd numbers is odd, p is even, and hence p = 2s.
This contradicts the choice of p/ q, such that p and q have no common factors.
< Prev
E
16 of 16
X
Next
*******
Me
A
Help
Save & Exit
Expert Solution

This question has been solved!
Explore an expertly crafted, step-by-step solution for a thorough understanding of key concepts.
This is a popular solution!
Trending now
This is a popular solution!
Step by step
Solved in 5 steps with 3 images

Recommended textbooks for you

Advanced Engineering Mathematics
Advanced Math
ISBN:
9780470458365
Author:
Erwin Kreyszig
Publisher:
Wiley, John & Sons, Incorporated

Numerical Methods for Engineers
Advanced Math
ISBN:
9780073397924
Author:
Steven C. Chapra Dr., Raymond P. Canale
Publisher:
McGraw-Hill Education

Introductory Mathematics for Engineering Applicat…
Advanced Math
ISBN:
9781118141809
Author:
Nathan Klingbeil
Publisher:
WILEY

Advanced Engineering Mathematics
Advanced Math
ISBN:
9780470458365
Author:
Erwin Kreyszig
Publisher:
Wiley, John & Sons, Incorporated

Numerical Methods for Engineers
Advanced Math
ISBN:
9780073397924
Author:
Steven C. Chapra Dr., Raymond P. Canale
Publisher:
McGraw-Hill Education

Introductory Mathematics for Engineering Applicat…
Advanced Math
ISBN:
9781118141809
Author:
Nathan Klingbeil
Publisher:
WILEY

Mathematics For Machine Technology
Advanced Math
ISBN:
9781337798310
Author:
Peterson, John.
Publisher:
Cengage Learning,

