An electric utility is considering bids for the purchase, installation, and operation of decentralized battery storage systems. The table below provides details for the two bids received.**Questions:**a) Which is the most economical bid if the discount rate is 11%? Note that none of the batteries are expected to have a salvage value after 30 years of use. The actual expected service life is listed in the bid.b) Also, solve using the Net Present Worth (NPW) method to compare these two mutually exclusive plans.**Bid Details:**| | Bid A | Bid B ||--------------------------|--------|--------|| Equipment cost | $112,000 | $98,000 || Installation cost | $25,000 | $30,000 || Annual Inspection and Maintenance fee | $2,000 | $2,000 || Annual extra income taxes | 0 | $800 || Life | 40 years | 35 years || Salvage Value | 0 | 0 |

Given, An electric utility is taking bids There are two bids : Bid A and Bid B The data is as follows :The NPW of the two bids are calculated as follows : We get, Therefore, since the NPW of Bid B is lower than Bid A, Bid B is more economical than Bid A.

Business

Economics

An electric utility is taking bids for the purchase, installation, and operation of decentralized battery storage systems. The table below has some details for the two bids received. a) Which is the most economical bid if the rate is 11%. None of the batteries are expected to have a salvage value after 30 years of use. (Actual expected service life is listed in the bid) b) Also solve using NPW method to compare these two mutually exclusive plans

An electric utility is taking bids for the purchase, installation, and operation of decentralized battery storage systems. The table below has some details for the two bids received. a) Which is the most economical bid if the rate is 11%. None of the batteries are expected to have a salvage value after 30 years of use. (Actual expected service life is listed in the bid) b) Also solve using NPW method to compare these two mutually exclusive plans

ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS

14th Edition

ISBN:9780190931919

Author:NEWNAN

Publisher:NEWNAN

Chapter1: Making Economics Decisions

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1QTC

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

The consultancy Imagination Inc. is working with its manufacturing client Parts-R-Us to improve their on-time performance. The firm can earn a bonus of up to $1,000,000 based on how much the on-time performance actually improves. It's current (baseline) on-time performance is 90%. The company typically completes approximately 1,000 orders per month, with approximately 100 orders delayed. The bonus payment is prorated according to the following criteria: · The on-time performance improvement is calculated based on a reduction in late events or an improvement in on-time performance. · No bonus is earned for the first 25% reduction in late events, say from 100 to 75. Maximum bonus is earned once Parts-R-Us achieves 95% on-time performance. Please answer the following: Write down a formula to determine the total bonus amount to be received Using your formula, show how much bonus would be paid if Parts-R-Us achieves 94% on-time performance.
Please answer fast
Two traffic signal systems are being considered for an intersection. One system costs $31,000 for installation and has an efficiency rating of 80%, requires 26 kW power (output), incurs a user cost of $0.23 per vehicle, and has a life of 9 years. A second system costs $47,000 to install, has an efficiency rating of 87%, requires 34 kW power (output), has a user cost of $0.19 per vehicle, and has a life of 17 years. Annual maintenance costs are $75 and $95, respectively. MARR = 8% per year. How many vehicles must use the intersection to justify the second system when electricity costs $0.09/kWh? Assume salvage value for each system equals zero. Project the difference in the user cost as savings for the second system. There are approximately 8,760 hours/year. Click the icon to view the interest and annuity table for discrete compounding when the MARR is 8% per year. At least 108000 vehicles per day must use the intersection to justify the second system. (Round up to the nearest whole…
Assume a pool of 115 people in an insurance pool (a group of people insured through community rating). It is estimated that a small number in the pool will have significant pre- existing conditions as indicated in the table. Based on the age of these 115 people, the insurance company estimates the following distribution of health care claims (which includes necessary profit and administrative costs of the insurance company). Number of Insured Antidipated Heath Costs/Year/Person $1,400 $1,500 $1,600 $1,700 $1,800 $1,900 $2,000 $2,100 $2,200 $2.300 $2,400 $2,500 $2,700 $2,000 $2,900 $3,000 $3,100 $3.200 $3.300 $4,000 57,00 $10,000 Everyone joins the poal ad pays the necessary premum in the first year. The clams experience of the customers is faund to be generaly consstent with expeclations of the insurance company. A) What would be the premium In the third year if there is no inflation, based on the company's oxperience from the past year? B) If those customers who have anticipated…
Which of the following interpretations would be best for the scenario analysis results shown below? Worst- case PW (18%) -$650,000 IRR 2.10% Most- likely case Best-case $58,000 $2,660,000 33% 14.60% a. Since the most-likely case has a PW <0, the project should be abandoned immediately b. Since the worst-case has a negative present worth, this project must be rejected. c. Since the average of the three cases is a positive present worth, the project is acceptable. d. Because only one of the scenarios shows the project as profitable, the project should be considered very risky, and, if accepted, should be subject to greater scrutiny in its planning and forecasting.