An Economics instructor assigns a class to investigate factors associated with the gross domestic product (GDP) of nations. Each student examines a different factor (such as life expectancy, literacy rate, etc.) for a few countries and reports to the class. Apparently, some of the classmates do not understand Statistics very well because several of their conclusions are incorrect. Explain the mistakes in comments a and b below.

MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
6th Edition
ISBN:9781119256830
Author:Amos Gilat
Publisher:Amos Gilat
Chapter1: Starting With Matlab
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1P
icon
Related questions
Question
100%
An Economics instructor assigns a class to investigate factors associated with the gross domestic product (GDP) of nations. Each student examines a different factor (such as life expectancy, literacy rate, etc.) for a few countries and reports to the class. Apparently, some
of the classmates do not understand Statistics very well because several of their conclusions are incorrect. Explain the mistakes in comments a and b below.
a) Explain the mistake in the statement "There was a very strong correlation of 1.22 between Life Expectancy and GDP" Choose the correct answer below
O A. A correlation cannot be greater than 1.
O B. A correlation that is greater than 1 implies that the variables are not quantitative, so the correlation cannot be interpreted.
OC. A correlation that is close to 1 implies a very weak correlation. The correlation must be close to 10 for it to be interpreted as a very strong correlation.
O D. A correlation that is greater than 1 implies a weak correlation, not a strong correlation
b) Explain the mistake in the following statement. "The correlation between Literacy Rate and GDP was 0.83. This shows that countries wanting to increase their standard of living should invest heavily in education" Choose the correct answer below
O A. Assuming that the relation is linear, the strong correlation shows a relation between Literacy Rate and GDP, but this does not show causality.
O B. Acorrelation of 0.83 is too weak to draw a meaning conclusion about the relation between Literacy Rate and GDP.
OC. Since GDP is a qualitative variable instead of a quantitative variable, no meaningful interpretation can be drawn from the correlation
O D. The correlation indicates that an increase in the standard of living would result in an increase in the spending in education, but it cannot imply the reverse, which is that an increase in the spending in education would increase the standard of living
Transcribed Image Text:An Economics instructor assigns a class to investigate factors associated with the gross domestic product (GDP) of nations. Each student examines a different factor (such as life expectancy, literacy rate, etc.) for a few countries and reports to the class. Apparently, some of the classmates do not understand Statistics very well because several of their conclusions are incorrect. Explain the mistakes in comments a and b below. a) Explain the mistake in the statement "There was a very strong correlation of 1.22 between Life Expectancy and GDP" Choose the correct answer below O A. A correlation cannot be greater than 1. O B. A correlation that is greater than 1 implies that the variables are not quantitative, so the correlation cannot be interpreted. OC. A correlation that is close to 1 implies a very weak correlation. The correlation must be close to 10 for it to be interpreted as a very strong correlation. O D. A correlation that is greater than 1 implies a weak correlation, not a strong correlation b) Explain the mistake in the following statement. "The correlation between Literacy Rate and GDP was 0.83. This shows that countries wanting to increase their standard of living should invest heavily in education" Choose the correct answer below O A. Assuming that the relation is linear, the strong correlation shows a relation between Literacy Rate and GDP, but this does not show causality. O B. Acorrelation of 0.83 is too weak to draw a meaning conclusion about the relation between Literacy Rate and GDP. OC. Since GDP is a qualitative variable instead of a quantitative variable, no meaningful interpretation can be drawn from the correlation O D. The correlation indicates that an increase in the standard of living would result in an increase in the spending in education, but it cannot imply the reverse, which is that an increase in the spending in education would increase the standard of living
Expert Solution
trending now

Trending now

This is a popular solution!

steps

Step by step

Solved in 3 steps

Blurred answer
Similar questions
  • SEE MORE QUESTIONS
Recommended textbooks for you
MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
Statistics
ISBN:
9781119256830
Author:
Amos Gilat
Publisher:
John Wiley & Sons Inc
Probability and Statistics for Engineering and th…
Probability and Statistics for Engineering and th…
Statistics
ISBN:
9781305251809
Author:
Jay L. Devore
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Statistics for The Behavioral Sciences (MindTap C…
Statistics for The Behavioral Sciences (MindTap C…
Statistics
ISBN:
9781305504912
Author:
Frederick J Gravetter, Larry B. Wallnau
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Elementary Statistics: Picturing the World (7th E…
Elementary Statistics: Picturing the World (7th E…
Statistics
ISBN:
9780134683416
Author:
Ron Larson, Betsy Farber
Publisher:
PEARSON
The Basic Practice of Statistics
The Basic Practice of Statistics
Statistics
ISBN:
9781319042578
Author:
David S. Moore, William I. Notz, Michael A. Fligner
Publisher:
W. H. Freeman
Introduction to the Practice of Statistics
Introduction to the Practice of Statistics
Statistics
ISBN:
9781319013387
Author:
David S. Moore, George P. McCabe, Bruce A. Craig
Publisher:
W. H. Freeman