An automobile parts manufacturer is considering whether they should invest in an automatic or nanually operated machinery. Both alternatives will have initial cost of $5,000. The automatic nachine allows for higher production levels and thus more revenues immediately, however more naintenance costs over time than the manual machine. The manual machine does not produce as nany door panels initially but has limited energy and maintenance costs, so its net revenues are easonably steady over time. The expected revenues of the automatic machine are $2,900 per rear for the next 4 years. The operating and maintenance cost will cost $200 now and will ncrease by $700 per year. For example, the operating cost in the second year is 200+700=S900. The expected net revenues (taking into account salaries and energy cost) for the manual machine are $1,500 for the first year and S1,600, $1,750, and $1,850 for years 2-4, respectively. 1. Calculate the Internal Rate of Return of each alternative. 2. Knowing the MARR is 8%, use NPW analysis to compare these alternatives and find out which one is better. 3. Calculate the benefit cost ratio for both alternatives.

ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS
14th Edition
ISBN:9780190931919
Author:NEWNAN
Publisher:NEWNAN
Chapter1: Making Economics Decisions
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1QTC
icon
Related questions
Question
Question 5
An automobile parts manufacturer is considering whether they should invest in an automatic or
manually operated machinery. Both alternatives will have initial cost of $5,000. The automatic
machine allows for higher production levels and thus more revenues immediately, however more
maintenance costs over time than the manual machine. The manual machine does not produce as
many door panels initially but has limited energy and maintenance costs, so its net revenues are
reasonably steady over time. The expected revenues of the automatic machine are $2,900 per
year for the next 4 years. The operating and maintenance cost will cost $200 now and will
increase by $700 per year. For example, the operating cost in the second year is 200+700-S900.
The expected net revenues (taking into account salaries and energy cost) for the manual machine
are $1,500 for the first year and $1,600, $1,750, and $1,850 for years 2-4, respectively.
1. Calculate the Internal Rate of Return of each alternative.
2. Knowing the MARR is 8%, use NPW analysis to compare these alternatives and find out
which one is better.
3. Calculate the benefit cost ratio for both alternatives.
4. You re now required to compare those two alternatives using incremental IRR analysis.
Conduct this analysis noting that for proper conclusions the incremental cash flow
diagram needs to reflect an investment (pay now and achieve revenues later). Think
carefully as to whether the increment, from mathematical perspective, needs to be from
Manual →Auto or Auto Manual.
Transcribed Image Text:Question 5 An automobile parts manufacturer is considering whether they should invest in an automatic or manually operated machinery. Both alternatives will have initial cost of $5,000. The automatic machine allows for higher production levels and thus more revenues immediately, however more maintenance costs over time than the manual machine. The manual machine does not produce as many door panels initially but has limited energy and maintenance costs, so its net revenues are reasonably steady over time. The expected revenues of the automatic machine are $2,900 per year for the next 4 years. The operating and maintenance cost will cost $200 now and will increase by $700 per year. For example, the operating cost in the second year is 200+700-S900. The expected net revenues (taking into account salaries and energy cost) for the manual machine are $1,500 for the first year and $1,600, $1,750, and $1,850 for years 2-4, respectively. 1. Calculate the Internal Rate of Return of each alternative. 2. Knowing the MARR is 8%, use NPW analysis to compare these alternatives and find out which one is better. 3. Calculate the benefit cost ratio for both alternatives. 4. You re now required to compare those two alternatives using incremental IRR analysis. Conduct this analysis noting that for proper conclusions the incremental cash flow diagram needs to reflect an investment (pay now and achieve revenues later). Think carefully as to whether the increment, from mathematical perspective, needs to be from Manual →Auto or Auto Manual.
Expert Solution
steps

Step by step

Solved in 5 steps with 9 images

Blurred answer
Similar questions
Recommended textbooks for you
ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS
ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS
Economics
ISBN:
9780190931919
Author:
NEWNAN
Publisher:
Oxford University Press
Principles of Economics (12th Edition)
Principles of Economics (12th Edition)
Economics
ISBN:
9780134078779
Author:
Karl E. Case, Ray C. Fair, Sharon E. Oster
Publisher:
PEARSON
Engineering Economy (17th Edition)
Engineering Economy (17th Edition)
Economics
ISBN:
9780134870069
Author:
William G. Sullivan, Elin M. Wicks, C. Patrick Koelling
Publisher:
PEARSON
Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)
Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)
Economics
ISBN:
9781305585126
Author:
N. Gregory Mankiw
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics: A Problem Solving Approach
Managerial Economics: A Problem Solving Approach
Economics
ISBN:
9781337106665
Author:
Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike Shor
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics & Business Strategy (Mcgraw-…
Managerial Economics & Business Strategy (Mcgraw-…
Economics
ISBN:
9781259290619
Author:
Michael Baye, Jeff Prince
Publisher:
McGraw-Hill Education