Problems on C.P.M &PERTоn C.Р.МProblemt:An assemble is to be made from '2 parts 'x' a d 'y'. Botha parts must be turned a lathe. 'y' must bepolished whereas 'x' need not be polished. The sequence of actives, to gather with their predecessor sgiven below.ActivityAPredecessor activityDescriptionOpen work orderGet Material for XGet material for YB.AAD.Then X on latheBThen y on lathePolish YAssemble x and yEB,CFD,FH.PackDraw a net work diagram of activities for project.

Activity Immediate Predecessors A - B A C A D B E B, C F E G D, F H G…

An assemble is to be made from '2 parts 'x' a d 'y. Botha parts must be turned a lathe. 'y' must be polished whereas 'x' need not be polished. The sequence of actives, to gather with their predecessor s given below.

An assemble is to be made from '2 parts 'x' a d 'y. Botha parts must be turned a lathe. 'y' must be polished whereas 'x' need not be polished. The sequence of actives, to gather with their predecessor s given below.

Database System Concepts

7th Edition

ISBN:9780078022159

Author:Abraham Silberschatz Professor, Henry F. Korth, S. Sudarshan

Publisher:Abraham Silberschatz Professor, Henry F. Korth, S. Sudarshan

Chapter1: Introduction

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1PE

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Figure 4 shows a program that tries to solve the dining philosophers' problem given that itonly includes 3 philosophers who want to eat, where only 3 forks are available and eachphilosopher needs two forks. The outputs after running the program are given .In the outputs, it seems that the program never finishes executing; thus, (a) which lines of the code are considered critical section? (b) which lines of the code is (or should be) implemented as atomic operations
"Semaphore' may be used also to control the flow of execution. Consider the following situation: P and P2 are two concurrent processes; P executes statement si and P2 executes statement s2. Use semaphores with the wait() and the signal() system calls to impose this flow of execution: s1 must be execute AFTER s2. Make a simulation to justify your answer (no point without a valid simulation).
In this problem, let REF(x.i) → DEF(x.k) denote that the linker willassociate an arbitrary reference to symbol x in module i to thedefinition of x in module k . For each example below, use thisnotation to indicate how the linker would resolve references to themultiply-defined symbol in each module. If there is a link-time error(rule 1), write " ERROR ". If the linker arbitrarily chooses one of thedefinitions (rule 3), write " UNKNOWN ".A./* Module 1 */ /* Module 2 */int main() static int main=1[{ int p2()} {}(a) REF(main.1) → DEF(_____._____)(b) REF(main.2) → DEF(_____._____)B./* Module 1 */ /* Module 2 */int x; double x;void main() int p2(){ {} }(a) REF(x.1) → DEF(_____._____)(b) REF(x.2) → DEF(_____._____)C./* Module 1 */ /* Module 2 */int x=1; double x=1.0;void main() int p2(){ {} }(a) REF(x.1) → DEF(_____._____)(b) REF(x.2) → DEF(_____._____)
Correct answer will be upvoted else Multiple Downvoted. Computer science. Berland local ICPC challenge has quite recently finished. There were m members numbered from 1 to m, who contended on a problemset of n issues numbered from 1 to n. Presently the article is going to happen. There are two issue creators, every one of them will tell the instructional exercise to precisely k back to back errands of the problemset. The creators pick the section of k continuous errands for themselves autonomously of one another. The sections can correspond, meet or not cross by any means. The I-th member is keen on paying attention to the instructional exercise of all continuous errands from li to ri. Every member consistently decides to pay attention to just the issue creator that tells the instructional exercises to the most extreme number of assignments he is keen on. Leave this greatest number alone artificial intelligence. No member can pay attention to both of the creators, regardless of…
please make sure the answer is correct and the diagram is understandable. please explain how to get the NAND-AND structure from the AND-OR-NOT. Thanks in advance for your help
Correct answer will be upvoted else Multiple Downvoted. Computer science. You need to change this grouping so all components in it are equivalent (I. e. it contains a few events of a similar component). To accomplish this, you pick some integer x that happens to some extent once in a, and afterward play out the accompanying activity quite a few times (perhaps zero): pick some portion [l,r] of the arrangement and eliminate it. Yet, there is one special case: you are not permitted to pick a fragment that contains x. All the more officially, you pick some adjoining aftereffect [al,al+1,… ,ar] to such an extent that ai≠x if l≤i≤r, and eliminate it. After expulsion, the numbering of components to one side of the eliminated portion changes: the component that was the (r+1)- th is presently l-th, the component that was (r+2)- th is currently (l+1)- th, etc (I. e. the leftover arrangement simply falls). Note that you can not change x after you picked it. For instance, assume n=6,…
Prove the following implication. Submit your proof in the file uncurry.log, following the same instructions as in Task 2 P (Q→ R) = (PAQ) → R (Functional programmers may recognize this as uncurrying.)
Giveanexampleofarelational-algebraexpressionandaquery-processingstrategy in each of the following situations:a. MRU is preferable to LRU. b. LRU is preferable to MRU.
Computer Science You are told that state machine A has one input x, and one output y, both with type {1, 2}, and that it has states {a, b, c, d}. You are told nothing further. Do you have enough information to construct a state machine B that simulates A? If so, give such a state machine, and the simulation relation.
In this problem, let REF(x.i) → DEF(x.k) denote that the linkerwill associate an arbitrary reference to symbol x in module ito the definition of x in module k . For each example thatfollows, use this notation to indicate how the linker wouldresolve references to the multiply-defined symbol in eachmodule. If there is a link-time error (rule 1), write "ERROR". If thelinker arbitrarily chooses one of the definitions (rule 3), write"UNKNOWN".A. /* Module 1 */ /* Module 2 */int main() int main;{ int p2()} {} (a) REF(main.1) → DEF(_____._____)(b) REF(main.2) → DEF(_____._____) B. /* Module 1 */ /* Module 2 */void main() int main = 1;{ int p2()} {}(a) REF(main.1) → DEF(_____._____)(b) REF(main.2) → DEF(_____._____)C. /* Module 1 */ /* Module 2 */intx; doublex=1.0;void main() int p2(){ {} }(a) REF(x.1) → DEF(_____._____)(b) REF(x.2)…
Solutions to a dynamic programming problem have (at minimum) three things: – A recurrence relation – A brief description of what your recurrence function represents and what each case represents. – A brief description of the memory element/storage and how it’s filled in. – Always give complete solutions, not just examples.– Always declare all your variables, in English. In particular, always describe the specific - problem your algorithm is supposed to solve. – Never use weak induction.
Solutions to a dynamic programming problem have (at minimum) three things: – A recurrence relation – A brief description of what your recurrence function represents and what each case represents. – A brief description of the memory element/storage and how it’s filled in. – Always give complete solutions, not just examples.– Always declare all your variables, in English. In particular, always describe the specific - problem your algorithm is supposed to solve. – Never use weak induction.