Albert established a qualified tuition program for each of his twins, Kim and Jim. He started each fund with $20,000 when the children were five years old. Albert made no further contributions to his children's plans. Thirteen years later, both children have graduated from high school. Kim's fund has accumulated to $45,000, and Jim's has accumulated to $42,000. Kim decides to attend a state university, which will cost $60,000 for four years (tuition, fees, room and board, and books). Jim decides to go to work instead of going to college. During the current year, $7,500 is used from Kim's plan to pay the cost of her first semester in college. Because Jim is not going to college now or in the future, Albert withdraws the $42,000 plan balance and gives it to Jim to start his new life after high school. Question Content Area a. During the period since the plans were established, should Albert or the twins have been including the annual plan earnings in gross income? Question Content Area b. What are the tax consequences to Kim and Albert of the $7,500 being used for the first semester's higher education costs? Question Content Area c. Because of her participation in the qualified tuition program, Kim received a 10% reduction in tuition charges; so less than $7,500 was withdrawn from her account. Is either Albert or Kim required to include the value of this discount in gross income? Question Content Area d. What are the tax consequences to Albert and Jim of Jim's qualified tuition program being closed? $fill in the blank 4c2ffefec00e062_2 of gross income and subject to a 10% additional tax.
Albert established a qualified tuition program for each of his twins, Kim and Jim. He started each fund with $20,000 when the children were five years old. Albert made no further contributions to his children's plans. Thirteen years later, both children have graduated from high school. Kim's fund has accumulated to $45,000, and Jim's has accumulated to $42,000. Kim decides to attend a state university, which will cost $60,000 for four years (tuition, fees, room and board, and books). Jim decides to go to work instead of going to college. During the current year, $7,500 is used from Kim's plan to pay the cost of her first semester in college. Because Jim is not going to college now or in the future, Albert withdraws the $42,000 plan balance and gives it to Jim to start his new life after high school.
Question Content Area
a. During the period since the plans were established, should Albert or the twins have been including the annual plan earnings in gross income?
Question Content Area
b. What are the tax consequences to Kim and Albert of the $7,500 being used for the first semester's higher education costs?
Question Content Area
c. Because of her participation in the qualified tuition program, Kim received a 10% reduction in tuition charges; so less than $7,500 was withdrawn from her account. Is either Albert or Kim required to include the value of this discount in gross income?
Question Content Area
d. What are the tax consequences to Albert and Jim of Jim's qualified tuition program being closed?
$fill in the blank 4c2ffefec00e062_2 of gross income and
subject to a 10% additional tax.
Step by step
Solved in 1 steps
