After allocating the joint process costs to its two joint products, Waterway Co. reports gross margin percentages and 35% for Product B. Sales reported for each product were $23,000 for Product A and $65,000 for Product B. Neither of the two products were processed beyond the split-off point. Calculate the total amount of joint costs assigned between the two products. Product A Allocated joint costs $ 17,250 $ Product B 42.250 Assuming Waterway used the physical quantities method to allocate the joint costs, what percentage of the total production volume did Product B represent? (Round answer to 2 decimal places, e.g. 15.25%.) Proportion of joint costs assigned to product B 71,01 %

After allocating the joint process costs to its two joint products, Waterway Co. reports gross margin percentages and 35% for Product B. Sales reported for each product were $23,000 for Product A and $65,000 for Product B. Neither of the two products were processed beyond the split-off point. Calculate the total amount of joint costs assigned between the two products. Product A Allocated joint costs $ 17,250 $ Product B 42.250 Assuming Waterway used the physical quantities method to allocate the joint costs, what percentage of the total production volume did Product B represent? (Round answer to 2 decimal places, e.g. 15.25%.) Proportion of joint costs assigned to product B 71,01 %

FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING

10th Edition

ISBN:9781259964947

Author:Libby

Publisher:Libby

Chapter1: Financial Statements And Business Decisions

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1Q

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Deming & Sons manufactures four grades of lubricant, W-10, W-20, W-30, and W-40, from a joint process. Additional information follows. Units Product Produced 54,600 39,000 W-10 W-20 W-30 W-40 Product 31, 200 31, 200 156,000 W-10 W-20 W-30 W-40 Sales Value at Split-Off $324,000 279,000 189,000 144,000 $936,000 Required: Assuming that total joint costs of $327,600 were allocated using the physical quantities method, what joint costs were allocated to each product? (Do not round intermediate calculations.) Joint Costs Allocated If Processed Further S 114,300 $ 91,800 $ 73,800 $ 73,800 Additional Costs $ 35,000 27,900 18,900 11,700 $ 93,500 Sales Values $ 355,000 324,000 234,000 156,000 $1,069,000
Dorsey Company manufactures three products from a common input in a joint processing operation. Joint processing costs up to the split-off point total $365,000 per quarter. For financial reporting purposes, the company allocates these costs to the joint products on the basis of their relative sales value at the split-off point. Unit selling prices and total output at the split-off point are as follows: Product A B C Selling Price $23.00 per pound $17.00 per pound $29.00 per gallon Product A B C Each product can be processed further after the split-off point. Additional processing requires no special facilities. The additional processing costs (per quarter) and unit selling prices after further processing are given below: Additional Processing Costs $78,540 $ 113,230 $50,560 Quarterly Output 13,600 pounds 21,200 pounds 4,800 gallons Required: 1. What is the financial advantage (disadvantage) of further processing each of the three products beyond the split-off point? 2. Based on your…
Pacheco, Inc., produces two products, overs and unders, in a single process. The joint costs ofthis process were $50,000, and 14,000 units of overs and 36,000 units of unders were produced.Separable processing costs beyond the split-off point were as follows: overs, $18,000; unders,$23,040. Overs sell for $2.00 per unit; unders sell for $3.14 per unit.Required:1. Allocate the $50,000 joint costs using the estimated net realizable value method.2. Suppose that overs could be sold at the split-off point for $1.80 per unit. Should Pacheco sellovers at split-off or process them further? Show supporting computations.
After allocating the joint process costs to its two joint products, Allomar Co. reports gross margin percentages of 30% for Product A and 40% for Product B. Sales reported for each product were $25,000 for Product A and $60,000 for Product B. Neither of the two products were processed beyond the split-off point. Calculate the total amount of joint costs assigned between the two products. Allocated joint costs Product A Product B Assuming Allomar used the physical quantities method to allocate the joint costs, what percentage of the total production volume did Product B represent? (Round answer to 2 decimal places, e.g. 15.25%.) Proportion of joint costs assigned to product B %
Denver Fabricators manufactures products DF1 and DF2 from a joint process, which also yields a by-product, BP. The company accounts for the revenues from its by-product sales as other income. Additional information follows: DF1 DF2 BP Total Units produced 27,000 18,000 15,000 60,000 Allocated joint costs ? ? ? $ 560,000 Sales value at split-off $ 561,000 $ 187,000 $ 102,000 $ 850,000 Required: Assuming that joint product costs are allocated using the net realizable value at split-off approach, what joint costs are allocated to each of the joint products DF1 and DF2 and to the by-product, BP?
Denver Fabricators manufactures products DF1 and DF2 from a joint process, which also yields a by-product, BP. The company accounts for the revenues from its by-product sales as other income. Additional information follows: Units produced Allocated joint costs Sales value at split-off DF1 DF2 BP DF1 27,300 ? DF2 18,300 ? $ 563,250 $ 187,750 Joint Cost BP 15,300 ? $ 102,300 Total Required: Assuming that joint product costs are allocated using the net realizable value at split-off approach, what joint costs are allocated to each of the joint products DF1 and DF2 and to the by-product, BP? Note: Do not round intermediate calculations. 60,900 $ 560,300 $ 853,300
Atkinson, Inc., manufactures products A, B, and C from a common process. Joint costs were $154,680. Additional information is as follows: If Processed Further Product UnitsProduced Sales Value at Split-Off Sales Value Additional Costs A 7,110 $ 46,660 $ 64,435 $ 4,740 B 8,150 70,905 91,280 12,225 C 4,075 48,900 61,125 16,300 19,335 $ 166,465 $ 216,840 $ 33,265 Assuming that joint product costs are allocated using the net realizable value method, what were the total costs assigned to Product B? Multiple Choice $78,110. $77,906. $77,110. $79,396.
Tango Company produces joint products M, N, and T from a joint process. This information concerns a batch produced in April at a joint cost of $190,000: Product Units Produced and Sold After Split-Off Total Separable Costs Total Final Sales Value M 17,000 $ 18,800 $ 230,000 N 11,000 16,400 210,000 T 12,000 3,800 39,000 Required: How much of the joint cost should be allocated to each joint product using the net realizable value method?
The Marshall Company has a joint production process that produces two joint products and a by-product. The joint products are Ying and Yang, and the by-product is Bit. Marshall accounts for the costs of its products using the net realizable value method. The two joint products are processed beyond the split-off point, incurring separable processing costs. There is a $1,500 disposal cost for the by- product. A summary of a recent month's activity at Marshall is shown below: Ying 75,000 75,000 $ 210,000 $ 15,000 $ 6.00 Total joint costs for Marshall in the recent month are $211,000, of which $90,730 is a variable cost. Units sold Units produced Separable processing costs-variable Separable processing costs-fixed Sales price Manufacturing cost per unit Total gross margin Yang 60,000 60,000 $ 65,000 $ 10,000 $ 12.50 Required: 1. Calculate the manufacturing cost per unit for each of the three products. (Round manufacturing cost per unit answers to 2 decimal places.) 2. Calculate the total…
Barrett Chemicals manufactures four chemicals, Chem-1, Chem-2, Chem-3, and Chem-4, from a joint process. The total joint costs in May were $594,000. Additional information follows: Product Units Produced Sales Value at Split-Off If Processed Further Additional Costs Sales Values Chem-1 264,000 $ 200,640 $ 29,040 $ 237,600 Chem-2 176,000 264,000 28,160 288,640 Chem-3 200,000 156,000 24,000 187,500 Chem-4 160,000 272,000 28,800 300,000 800,000 $ 892,640 $ 110,000 $ 1,013,740 Required: Barrett Chemicals uses the physical quantities method to allocate joint costs. What joint costs would be allocated to each product in May?
Assume a company has two products—A and B—that emerge from a joint process. Product A has been allocated $24,000 of the total joint costs of $48,000. A total of 2,000 units of Product A are produced from the joint process. Product A can be sold at the split-off point for $16 per unit, or it can be processed further for an additional total cost of $14,800 and then sold for $25 per unit. What is the financial advantage (disadvantage) of further processing Product A? Multiple Choice $(3,200) $3,200 $(22,000) $22,000
Question No. 4 HASF Corporation manufactures products A, B, and C from a joint process. Joint costs are allocated on the basis of relative sales value at the end of the joint process. Additional information for HASF are as follows: B Total Units produced 24,000 Joint costs 240,000 Sales value before additional processing 400,000 Additional costs for further processing 12,000 Sales value if processed further 470,000 12,000 8,000 4,000 144,000 60,000 36,000 240,000 100,000 60,000 28,000 20,000 60,000 280,000 120,000 70,000 Required: a. Which, if any, of products A, B, and C should be processed further and then sold? b. Keeping in view the answer of "part a", write down your critical feedback to support your answer (Word limit Max 200)