ADVANCED ANALYSIS Let: MUA=Z=16-3x MUB=z=14-2y, where z is marginal utility per dollar measured in utils, x is the amount spent on product A, and y is the amount spent on product B. Assume that the consumer has $9 to spend on A and B-that is, x+y= 9. Instructions: Enter your answers as a whole number. a. How is the $9 best allocated between A and B? $ on A and $1 on B b. How much utility will the marginal dollar yield? utils

ADVANCED ANALYSIS Let: MUA=Z=16-3x MUB=z=14-2y, where z is marginal utility per dollar measured in utils, x is the amount spent on product A, and y is the amount spent on product B. Assume that the consumer has $9 to spend on A and B-that is, x+y= 9. Instructions: Enter your answers as a whole number. a. How is the $9 best allocated between A and B? $ on A and $1 on B b. How much utility will the marginal dollar yield? utils

ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS

14th Edition

ISBN:9780190931919

Author:NEWNAN

Publisher:NEWNAN

Chapter1: Making Economics Decisions

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1QTC

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Please correct answer and don't use hand rating
Give typing answer with explanation and conclusion Consider a good or service where consumers pay more than its actual valuation (for eg, products with markup prices at retail significantly higher than their cost: greetings cards, bottled water, stock price, movie theatre popcorn/candy). Based on the irrational decision-making and marginal analysis, explain why such irrational decision-making could take place in this situation.
1. The rules regarding economic decision maker behavior are: Group of answer choices A: Consumers behave rationally and maximize utility, but producers do not behave rationally B: Producers behave rationally and maximize profits, but consumers do not behave rationally C: consumers are ratiional and maximize utility, and producers are rational and maximize profits D: Consumers maximize total consumption, and producers maximize production
Oscar purchased a $30 steak for dinner, but burned it bad on the grill. Since he paid top dollar for the steak he figures he should eat it anyways. Is Oscar properly using economic reasoning? Yes, the marginal cost of not eating the steak would be $30. No, the $30 spent on the steak is a sunk cost and should not be included in his decision whether to eat the steak or not.. Yes, if he doesn't eat the steak he will have wasted economic resources. No, the opportunity of eating the steak is whatever else he could have purchased for the $30.
Solve all questions.......you will not solve all questions then I will give you down upvote....... Arturo loves chocolate mousse but he is concerned about eating too much sugar. He would like to indulge himself eating as many mousses as possible as long as he keeps daily sugar consumption under 100 grams. Consider the following two choice rules: • Rule 1: After eating N mousses, if he is offered an additional mousse, he would eat it if the mousse contains less than 25 grams of sugar. If instead he is offered a fixed number of daily mousses in advance, he would accept them only if the total sugar content does not exceed 100 grams, otherwise, he would choose not to eat any mousse. • Rule 2: Choose in advance a fixed number of mousses to eat each day that does not exceed 100 grams of sugar content in total. (a) If each mousse contains 21 grams of sugar, Which rules (if any) satisfy IIA? Justify your answer. (b) Can you find a utility function that is maximized by Rule 1? How about…
Solve all this question......you will not solve all questions then I will give you down?? upvote....
Solve all this question......you will not solve all questions then I will give you down?? upvote.....
The questions are attached in the image. The questions are based on 'General equilibrium' model in 'economics'. (please do not tag it in some other subject) These are simple Multiple choice questions which are undergrad level. Please do not reject them. The answers to 45,46 and 47 are D,C and C respectively. Please answer the following as well: 1. For 45, provide the set of pareto efficient outcomes. 2. For 46, provide an algebric solution if possible. Provide a mathematical argument. 3. For 47, provide provide a set of points (if exists) that will take us to the given equilibrium under the given conditions. The questions are easy. PLEASE DO NOT REJECT IT!