Activity-Based Supplier Costing Noguchi Company manufactures cooling systems. Noguchi produces all the parts necessary for its product except for one electronic component, which is purchased from two local suppliers: Manzer Inc. and Buckner Company. Both suppliers are reliable and seldom deliver late; however, Manzer sells the component for $89 per unit, while Buckner sells the same component for $86. Noguchi purchases 80% of its components from Buckner because of its lower price. The total annual demand is 4,000,000 components. To help assess the cost effect of the two components, the following data were collected for supplier-related activities and suppliers: 1. Activity Data Inspecting components (sampling only) Reworking products (due to failed component) Warranty work (due to failed component) II. Supplier Data Manzer Inc. $89 Manzer Buckner 800,000 Unit purchase price Units purchased Sampling hours Rework hours Warranty hours *Sampling inspection for Manzer's product has been reduced because the reject rate is so low Required: 1. Calculate the cost per component for each supplier, taking into consideration the costs of the supplier-related activities and using the current prices and sales volume. (Note: Round the intermediate calculations to the whole number for the following activity rates: "Reworking products" and "Warranty work". Round the unit cost to two decimal places.) Manzer Inc. per unit Buckner Company per unit 2a. Suppose that Noguchi loses $5,088,000 in sales per year because it develops a poor reputation due to defective units attributable to failed components. Using warranty hours, assign the cost of lost sales to each supplier. 80 360 Activity Cost 800 $545,000 7,770,000 11,170,000 Buckner Company $86 3,200,000 3,920 5,640 15,200 2b. By how much would this change the cost of each supplier's component? Round your answers to the nearest cent. Manzer unit cost increase - ✓ Buckner unit cost increase ✔ 3. Based on the analysis in Requirements 1 and 2, discuss the importance of activity-based supplier costing for internal decision making. As with product costing, accurate assignment of costs to the cost object is essential for well-grounded decision-making. Suppliers can cause a firm to perform costly activities such as inspection, rework, and warranty work. The total cost of a component is thus more than its purchase price. As this example shows, the component with the higher price is actually less expensive because i ✔ it causes less demand on internal costly activities. Thus, the company would likely decrease the purchases of one supplier in favor of the other. It also might attempt to work with the one supplier which is causing significant demands on internal activities to see if the quality of its component can be increased

FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING
10th Edition
ISBN:9781259964947
Author:Libby
Publisher:Libby
Chapter1: Financial Statements And Business Decisions
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1Q
icon
Related questions
Question

///

Activity-Based Supplier Costing
Noguchi Company manufactures cooling systems. Noguchi produces all the parts necessary for its product except for one electronic component, which is purchased from two local suppliers: Manzer Inc. and Buckner Company. Both suppliers are reliable and seldom deliver late; however, Manzer sells the component for $89 per unit, while Buckner sells the same component for $86. Noguchi purchases 80%
of its components from Buckner because of its lower price. The total annual demand is 4,000,000 components.
To help assess the cost effect of the two components, the following data were collected for supplier-related activities and suppliers:
I. Activity Data
Inspecting components (sampling only)
Reworking products (due to failed component)
Warranty work (due to failed component)
II. Supplier Data
Unit purchase price
Units purchased
Sampling hours*
Rework hours
Warranty hours
Required:
Manzer Inc.
Manzer Inc.
$89
Manzer
800,000
Buckner
80
360
800
Activity Cost
$545,000
7,770,000
11,170,000
* Sampling Inspection for Manzer's product has been reduced because the reject rate is so low.
Buckner
Company
$86
1. Calculate the cost per component for each supplier, taking into consideration the costs of the supplier-related activities and using the current prices and sales volume. (Note: Round the intermediate calculations to the whole number for the following activity rates: "Reworking products" and "Warranty work". Round the unit cost to two decimal places.)
per unit
per unit
3,200,000
3,920
5,640
15,200
Buckner Company
2a. Suppose that Noguchi loses $5,088,000 in sales per year because it develops a poor reputation due to defective units attributable to failed components. Using warranty hours, assign the cost of lost sales to each supplier.
2b. By how much would this change the cost of each supplier's component? Round your answers to the nearest cent.
Manzer
unit cost increase
✓
Buckner unit cost increase - ✓
3. Based on the analysis in Requirements 1 and 2, discuss the importance of activity-based supplier costing for internal decision making.
As with product costing, accurate assignment of costs to the cost object is essential for well-grounded decision-making. Suppliers can cause a firm to perform costly activities such as inspection, rework, and warranty work. The total cost
causes less demand on internal costly activities. Thus, the company would likely decrease ✔ the purchases of one supplier in favor of the other. It also might attempt to work with the one supplier which is causing significant demands on internal activities to see if the quality of its component can be increased.
✓of a component is thus more than its purchase price. As this example shows, the component with the higher ✓ price is actually less expensive because it
Transcribed Image Text:Activity-Based Supplier Costing Noguchi Company manufactures cooling systems. Noguchi produces all the parts necessary for its product except for one electronic component, which is purchased from two local suppliers: Manzer Inc. and Buckner Company. Both suppliers are reliable and seldom deliver late; however, Manzer sells the component for $89 per unit, while Buckner sells the same component for $86. Noguchi purchases 80% of its components from Buckner because of its lower price. The total annual demand is 4,000,000 components. To help assess the cost effect of the two components, the following data were collected for supplier-related activities and suppliers: I. Activity Data Inspecting components (sampling only) Reworking products (due to failed component) Warranty work (due to failed component) II. Supplier Data Unit purchase price Units purchased Sampling hours* Rework hours Warranty hours Required: Manzer Inc. Manzer Inc. $89 Manzer 800,000 Buckner 80 360 800 Activity Cost $545,000 7,770,000 11,170,000 * Sampling Inspection for Manzer's product has been reduced because the reject rate is so low. Buckner Company $86 1. Calculate the cost per component for each supplier, taking into consideration the costs of the supplier-related activities and using the current prices and sales volume. (Note: Round the intermediate calculations to the whole number for the following activity rates: "Reworking products" and "Warranty work". Round the unit cost to two decimal places.) per unit per unit 3,200,000 3,920 5,640 15,200 Buckner Company 2a. Suppose that Noguchi loses $5,088,000 in sales per year because it develops a poor reputation due to defective units attributable to failed components. Using warranty hours, assign the cost of lost sales to each supplier. 2b. By how much would this change the cost of each supplier's component? Round your answers to the nearest cent. Manzer unit cost increase ✓ Buckner unit cost increase - ✓ 3. Based on the analysis in Requirements 1 and 2, discuss the importance of activity-based supplier costing for internal decision making. As with product costing, accurate assignment of costs to the cost object is essential for well-grounded decision-making. Suppliers can cause a firm to perform costly activities such as inspection, rework, and warranty work. The total cost causes less demand on internal costly activities. Thus, the company would likely decrease ✔ the purchases of one supplier in favor of the other. It also might attempt to work with the one supplier which is causing significant demands on internal activities to see if the quality of its component can be increased. ✓of a component is thus more than its purchase price. As this example shows, the component with the higher ✓ price is actually less expensive because it
Expert Solution
trending now

Trending now

This is a popular solution!

steps

Step by step

Solved in 3 steps

Blurred answer
Recommended textbooks for you
FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING
FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING
Accounting
ISBN:
9781259964947
Author:
Libby
Publisher:
MCG
Accounting
Accounting
Accounting
ISBN:
9781337272094
Author:
WARREN, Carl S., Reeve, James M., Duchac, Jonathan E.
Publisher:
Cengage Learning,
Accounting Information Systems
Accounting Information Systems
Accounting
ISBN:
9781337619202
Author:
Hall, James A.
Publisher:
Cengage Learning,
Horngren's Cost Accounting: A Managerial Emphasis…
Horngren's Cost Accounting: A Managerial Emphasis…
Accounting
ISBN:
9780134475585
Author:
Srikant M. Datar, Madhav V. Rajan
Publisher:
PEARSON
Intermediate Accounting
Intermediate Accounting
Accounting
ISBN:
9781259722660
Author:
J. David Spiceland, Mark W. Nelson, Wayne M Thomas
Publisher:
McGraw-Hill Education
Financial and Managerial Accounting
Financial and Managerial Accounting
Accounting
ISBN:
9781259726705
Author:
John J Wild, Ken W. Shaw, Barbara Chiappetta Fundamental Accounting Principles
Publisher:
McGraw-Hill Education