Activity-Based Supplier Costing Noguchi Company manufactures cooling systems. Noguchi produces all the parts necessary for its product except for one electronic component, which is purchased from two local suppliers: Manzer Inc. and Buckner Company. Both suppliers are reliable and seldom deliver late; however, Manzer sells the component for $89 per unit, while Buckner sells the same component for $86. Noguchi purchases 80% of its components from Buckner because of its lower price. The total annual demand is 4,000,000 components. To help assess the cost effect of the two components, the following data were collected for supplier-related activities and suppliers: I. Activity Data Inspecting components (sampling only) Activity Cost $780,000 Reworking products (due to failed component) 6,520,000 10,270,000 Warranty work (due to failed component) II. Supplier Data Unit purchase price Units purchased Sampling hours* Rework hours Warranty hours Manzer Buckner Inc. Company $89 $86 800,000 3,200,000 80 360 800 3,920 5,640 15,200 * Sampling inspection for Manzer's product has been reduced because the reject rate is so low. Required: 1. Calculate the cost per component for each supplier, taking into consideration the costs of the supplier-related activities and using the current prices and sales volume. (Note: Round the intermediate calculations to the whole number for the following activity rates: "Reworking products" and "Warranty work". Round the unit cost to two decimal places.) Manzer Inc. Buckner Company x per unit x per unit 2a. Suppose that Noguchi loses $5,408,000 in sales per year because it develops a poor reputation due to defective units attributable to failed components. Using warranty hours, assign the cost of lost sales to each supplier. Manzer Buckner 2b. By how much would this change the cost of each supplier's component? Round your answers to the nearest cent. Manzer unit cost incre: $ Buckner unit cost increa✔ x 3. Based on the analysis in Requirements 1 and 2, discuss the importance of activity-based supplier costing for internal decision making. As with product costing, accurate assignment of costs to the cost object is essential for well-grounded decision-making. Suppliers can cause a firm to perform costly activities such as inspection, rework, and warranty work. The total cost of a component is thus more than its purchase price. As this example shows, the component with the higher price is actually less expensive because it causes less demand on internal costly activities. Thus, the company would likely decrease the purchases of one supplier in favor of the other. It also might attempt to work with the one supplier which is causing significant demands on internal activities to see if the quality of its component can be increased.

Practical Management Science
6th Edition
ISBN:9781337406659
Author:WINSTON, Wayne L.
Publisher:WINSTON, Wayne L.
Chapter2: Introduction To Spreadsheet Modeling
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 20P: Julie James is opening a lemonade stand. She believes the fixed cost per week of running the stand...
icon
Related questions
Question
Activity-Based Supplier Costing
Noguchi Company manufactures cooling systems. Noguchi produces all the parts necessary for its product except for one electronic component, which is purchased from two local suppliers: Manzer Inc. and Buckner Company. Both suppliers are reliable and seldom deliver late;
however, Manzer sells the component for $89 per unit, while Buckner sells the same component for $86. Noguchi purchases 80% of its components from Buckner because of its lower price. The total annual demand is 4,000,000 components.
To help assess the cost effect of the two components, the following data were collected for supplier-related activities and suppliers:
I. Activity Data
Inspecting components (sampling
only)
Activity
Cost
$780,000
Reworking products (due to failed
component)
6,520,000
10,270,000
Warranty work (due to failed
component)
II. Supplier Data
Unit purchase price
Units purchased
Sampling hours*
Rework hours
Warranty hours
Manzer Buckner
Inc. Company
$89
$86
800,000 3,200,000
80
360
800
3,920
5,640
15,200
* Sampling inspection for Manzer's product has been reduced because the reject rate is so low.
Required:
1. Calculate the cost per component for each supplier, taking into consideration the costs of the supplier-related activities and using the current prices and sales volume. (Note: Round the intermediate calculations to the whole number for the following activity rates:
"Reworking products" and "Warranty work". Round the unit cost to two decimal places.)
Manzer Inc.
Buckner
Company
x per
unit
x per
unit
2a. Suppose that Noguchi loses $5,408,000 in sales per year because it develops a poor reputation due to defective units attributable to failed components. Using warranty hours, assign the cost of lost sales to each supplier.
Manzer
Buckner
2b. By how much would this change the cost of each supplier's component? Round your answers to the nearest cent.
Manzer unit cost incre: $
Buckner unit cost increa✔
x
3. Based on the analysis in Requirements 1 and 2, discuss the importance of activity-based supplier costing for internal decision making.
As with product costing, accurate assignment of costs to the cost object is essential for well-grounded decision-making. Suppliers can cause a firm to perform costly activities such as inspection, rework, and warranty work. The total cost of a component is thus more than its
purchase price. As this example shows, the component with the higher price is actually less expensive because it causes less demand on internal costly activities. Thus, the company would likely decrease the purchases of one supplier in favor of the other. It also might
attempt to work with the one supplier which is causing significant demands on internal activities to see if the quality of its component can be increased.
Transcribed Image Text:Activity-Based Supplier Costing Noguchi Company manufactures cooling systems. Noguchi produces all the parts necessary for its product except for one electronic component, which is purchased from two local suppliers: Manzer Inc. and Buckner Company. Both suppliers are reliable and seldom deliver late; however, Manzer sells the component for $89 per unit, while Buckner sells the same component for $86. Noguchi purchases 80% of its components from Buckner because of its lower price. The total annual demand is 4,000,000 components. To help assess the cost effect of the two components, the following data were collected for supplier-related activities and suppliers: I. Activity Data Inspecting components (sampling only) Activity Cost $780,000 Reworking products (due to failed component) 6,520,000 10,270,000 Warranty work (due to failed component) II. Supplier Data Unit purchase price Units purchased Sampling hours* Rework hours Warranty hours Manzer Buckner Inc. Company $89 $86 800,000 3,200,000 80 360 800 3,920 5,640 15,200 * Sampling inspection for Manzer's product has been reduced because the reject rate is so low. Required: 1. Calculate the cost per component for each supplier, taking into consideration the costs of the supplier-related activities and using the current prices and sales volume. (Note: Round the intermediate calculations to the whole number for the following activity rates: "Reworking products" and "Warranty work". Round the unit cost to two decimal places.) Manzer Inc. Buckner Company x per unit x per unit 2a. Suppose that Noguchi loses $5,408,000 in sales per year because it develops a poor reputation due to defective units attributable to failed components. Using warranty hours, assign the cost of lost sales to each supplier. Manzer Buckner 2b. By how much would this change the cost of each supplier's component? Round your answers to the nearest cent. Manzer unit cost incre: $ Buckner unit cost increa✔ x 3. Based on the analysis in Requirements 1 and 2, discuss the importance of activity-based supplier costing for internal decision making. As with product costing, accurate assignment of costs to the cost object is essential for well-grounded decision-making. Suppliers can cause a firm to perform costly activities such as inspection, rework, and warranty work. The total cost of a component is thus more than its purchase price. As this example shows, the component with the higher price is actually less expensive because it causes less demand on internal costly activities. Thus, the company would likely decrease the purchases of one supplier in favor of the other. It also might attempt to work with the one supplier which is causing significant demands on internal activities to see if the quality of its component can be increased.
Expert Solution
steps

Step by step

Solved in 2 steps

Blurred answer
Similar questions
Recommended textbooks for you
Practical Management Science
Practical Management Science
Operations Management
ISBN:
9781337406659
Author:
WINSTON, Wayne L.
Publisher:
Cengage,
Operations Management
Operations Management
Operations Management
ISBN:
9781259667473
Author:
William J Stevenson
Publisher:
McGraw-Hill Education
Operations and Supply Chain Management (Mcgraw-hi…
Operations and Supply Chain Management (Mcgraw-hi…
Operations Management
ISBN:
9781259666100
Author:
F. Robert Jacobs, Richard B Chase
Publisher:
McGraw-Hill Education
Business in Action
Business in Action
Operations Management
ISBN:
9780135198100
Author:
BOVEE
Publisher:
PEARSON CO
Purchasing and Supply Chain Management
Purchasing and Supply Chain Management
Operations Management
ISBN:
9781285869681
Author:
Robert M. Monczka, Robert B. Handfield, Larry C. Giunipero, James L. Patterson
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Production and Operations Analysis, Seventh Editi…
Production and Operations Analysis, Seventh Editi…
Operations Management
ISBN:
9781478623069
Author:
Steven Nahmias, Tava Lennon Olsen
Publisher:
Waveland Press, Inc.