According to a report from the US Census Bureau, "the average lifetime earnings of a full-time year round work with a high school education is about $1.2 million, compared to about $2.1 million for a college graduate. This indicates that there is a considerable benefit to a graduate from investing in his or her own education. Tuition at most state universities covers only about 2/3- of actual costs, so the state provides a subsidy to college education. If this subsidy is appropriate, is the externality created by the college education a positive or negative externality? What does this imply about the costs and benefits to the student as opposed to the costs and benefits to society in general? What are some reasons for the differences?

According to a report from the US Census Bureau, "the average lifetime earnings of a full-time year round work with a high school education is about $1.2 million, compared to about $2.1 million for a college graduate. This indicates that there is a considerable benefit to a graduate from investing in his or her own education. Tuition at most state universities covers only about 2/3- of actual costs, so the state provides a subsidy to college education. If this subsidy is appropriate, is the externality created by the college education a positive or negative externality? What does this imply about the costs and benefits to the student as opposed to the costs and benefits to society in general? What are some reasons for the differences?

ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS

14th Edition

ISBN:9780190931919

Author:NEWNAN

Publisher:NEWNAN

Chapter1: Making Economics Decisions

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1QTC

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

how to find the 90/10 income ratio?
Mary earns $15 per hour, Paul earns $18 per hour, and Peter earns $22 per hour. Peter has three years of college, Paul has two, and Mary has one. The difference in their choice of years of education is due completely to different discount rates. How much can the available information reveal about each person’s discount rate?
You have the option to play tennis or a round of golf (but not both). The tennis match requires you to take 2 hours off from work and the round of golf requires you to take 4 hours off from work. Playing tennis has value to you equal to $70, while golf has value to you equal to $105. Tennis courts are publicly available at no cost, but golf costs $20 per round. Suppose your wage from working is $12 per hour. Part 2 The net benefit from playing tennis is $ enter your response here and the net benefit from playing golf is $ enter your response here. (Enter your responses as integers.)
Currently, the tuition for a state college student includes a fixed annual charge of $50.00 for printing in the computer labs, and students are allowed to print as many pages of material as they want. The average student prints 1,000 pages anuually under this method. The business office at the school is considering changing to a "per page" system where ther is no annual fee included in tuition but each page printed will cost $0.05. a. What effect will the "per page" system have on the amount of pages printed annually at the state college as compared to the current system? b. Under the $50.00 fixed annual charge, James only printed 800 pages annually. Given the new system of charging $0.05 per page, is James likely to print fewer pages?
Dina and Charles are married, under the age of 65, and have two children under the age of 18. Charles works full time and earns $19,000, while Dina works part time and earns $9,000. Thus, in total, their family income is $28,000. Are Charles and Dina living in poverty? O Yes O No Suppose that Charles divorces Dina and leaves the family without paying alimony or child support. Dina must now support her two children alone, so she begins working full time and earns a total of $18,000. Are Dina and her children living in poverty? O Yes O No Again, consider Dina, a single mother with two children under 18 who earns an annual income of $18,000. Suppose that Dina qualifies for a welfare program for single mothers that provides her with $4,000 in food assistance. After receiving welfare, is Dina's family living in poverty? O Yes O No
In 2011, the government paid $600 million in retirement benefits to decreased federal employees. This is an example of
Which of the following statements is not correct? Select one: a. The economic life cycle theory explains why gifts of goods and services reduce poverty for the very young and the very old. b. Because people can borrow and save to smooth out changes in income, their standard of living in any one year depends more on lifetime income than on a particular year's income. c. The percentage of the population that suffers from long-term poverty is far smaller than the percentage of the population that suffers from short-term poverty because there is a high level of economic mobility in the United States. d. Permanent income is a better measure of a family's ability to buy the necessities of life than is transitory income.
Economics Slade and Meredith had each been earning $600 per week before losing their jobs at Nardel Solutions. Slade and Meredith live in states with replacement ratios of 1:3 (i.e., 33.33%), but Meredith's state caps unemployment compensation at $100 per week. The table below represents their marginal benefit and marginal cost of search assuming no unemployment compensation. Reservation Wage Marginal Benefit ($/week) Marginal Cost 100 700 500 150 600 450 200 500 400 250 400 350 300 300 300 350 200 250 400 100 200 With unemployment compensation, what is Slade's optimal reservation wage? O $600 per week O $300 per week O $250 per week O $500 per week
Suppose a government program guarantees $ 2,000 a month in income, even for those who do not work at all. However, if the recipient earns income by working, the benefit is reduced by 50 cents for each $1 earned. Which of the following statements is true? This program will redefine the proverty line. While the goal may be to reduce poverty, people rarely respond to incentives. This program will reduce the incentive to work significantly. The goal of this program is to increase the incentive to work, reducing the poverty trap.
Why does sharecropping continue to exist as opposed to laborers renting land and paying for the rent with the proceeds of their harvest? Sharecropping is a farming system in which owners of the land allow others to farm it and then the harvest is split, with some portion (let's say half) going to the laborer and some to the land owner. Renting land (the "English system") is an alternative in which laborers pay a fixed monetary rent and then keep all of the proceeds of their production. For hundreds of years commentators have pointed out that sharecropping lowers overall investment and effort and that renting both generates more revenue for owners and, on average, more revenue for laborers due to the harvest generally being much larger. However, when prices drop significantly for agricultural outputs, rents can exceed the total value of output under the English system. Given that in the English system rent returns more money to land owners and on average generates more income for…
A medical researcher is trying to cure a disease. For each unit of effort she puts into her work, she generates a utility benefit of 10 for each member of society. There are 1,000 people in society besides the medical researcher. The medical researcher doesn’t care about other people. She is in it for the glory. For each unit of effort she puts into her work, she gets a utility benefit of 1000 (which is inclusive of the 10 that she gets for being a member of society, plus a payoff of 990 in glory). If she exerts effort e, she also suffers cost e^2. (a) Suppose a policymaker who was a committed utilitarian (including caring about the medical researcher’s glory, since the medical researcher cares about it) was to choose the level of effort the medical researcher exerts. That policymaker would add up the total utility in society (including the medical researcher’s utility) from any given level of effort and choose the level of effort that maximizes that aggregate utility. i. What (social)…
Suppose the government introduced a child benefit equal to $7000 per year. For every dollar earned by the family, the benefit amount is reduced by 7 cents. At what level of earnings will the family no longer receive a child benefit?