2. ABC Company uses a joint process to produce products A, B, and C. The joint production costs for 201Awere 500,000 and were allocated using relative sales value at the split-off point method.Each product may be sold at its split-off point or processed further. Additional processing costs are entirelyvariable.AdditionalSales Value atFinal SalesProductsProcessingCostsP130,000100,000140,000Split-offValueP300,000120,000250,000420,000230,000AB400,000P1,050,000P670,000P370,000a. To maximize profit, which product/s should be sold at split-off point and be processed further,respectively?b. If the alternative were to sell at split-off point or to process further all products, which alternativewould be recommended?

Given joint costs = 500,000 These joint costs should be allocated to products based on their sales…

ABC Company uses a joint process to produce products A, B, and C. The joint production costs for 201A were 500,000 and were allocated using relative sales value at the split-off point method. Each product may be sold at its split-off point or processed further. Additional processing costs are entirely variable. Additional Sales Value at Final Sales Processing Costs P130,000 Products Split-off Value P300,000 120,000 250,000 P670,000 A 420,000 230,000 400,000 P1,050,000 в 100,000 140,000 P370,000 a. To maximize profit, which product/s should be sold at split-off point and be processed further, respectively? b. If the alternative were to sell at split-off point or to process further all products, which alternative would be recommended?

ABC Company uses a joint process to produce products A, B, and C. The joint production costs for 201A were 500,000 and were allocated using relative sales value at the split-off point method. Each product may be sold at its split-off point or processed further. Additional processing costs are entirely variable. Additional Sales Value at Final Sales Processing Costs P130,000 Products Split-off Value P300,000 120,000 250,000 P670,000 A 420,000 230,000 400,000 P1,050,000 в 100,000 140,000 P370,000 a. To maximize profit, which product/s should be sold at split-off point and be processed further, respectively? b. If the alternative were to sell at split-off point or to process further all products, which alternative would be recommended?

FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING

10th Edition

ISBN:9781259964947

Author:Libby

Publisher:Libby

Chapter1: Financial Statements And Business Decisions

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1Q

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Vikram
Dorsey Company manufactures three products from a common input in a joint processing operation. Joint processing costs up to the split-off point total $355,000 per quarter. For financial reporting purposes, the company allocates these costs to the joint products based on their relative sales value at the split-off point. Unit selling prices and total output at the split-off point are as follows: Product A a С Selling Price $ 21.00 per pound $15.00 per pound $27.00 per gallon Product A D C Each product can be processed further after the split-off point. Additional processing requires no special facilities. The additional processing costs (per quarter) and unit selling prices after further processing are given below. Additional Processing Costa $ 73,440 Quarterly Output 13,200 pounds 20,600 pounds 4,400 gallons $ 105,620 $ 46,000 Selling Price $26.20 per pound $ 21.20 per pound $35.20 per gallon Required: 1. What is the financial advantage (disadvantage) of further processing each of the…
None
After allocating the joint process costs to its two joint products, Allomar Co. reports gross margin percentages of 30% for Product A and 40% for Product B. Sales reported for each product were $25,000 for Product A and $60,000 for Product B. Neither of the two products were processed beyond the split-off point. Calculate the total amount of joint costs assigned between the two products. Allocated joint costs Product A Product B Assuming Allomar used the physical quantities method to allocate the joint costs, what percentage of the total production volume did Product B represent? (Round answer to 2 decimal places, e.g. 15.25%.) Proportion of joint costs assigned to product B %
Atkinson, Inc., manufactures products A, B, and C from a common process. Joint costs were $154,680. Additional information is as follows: If Processed Further Product UnitsProduced Sales Value at Split-Off Sales Value Additional Costs A 7,110 $ 46,660 $ 64,435 $ 4,740 B 8,150 70,905 91,280 12,225 C 4,075 48,900 61,125 16,300 19,335 $ 166,465 $ 216,840 $ 33,265 Assuming that joint product costs are allocated using the net realizable value method, what were the total costs assigned to Product B? Multiple Choice $78,110. $77,906. $77,110. $79,396.
Tango Company produces joint products M, N, and T from a joint process. This information concerns a batch produced in April at a joint cost of $190,000: Product Units Produced and Sold After Split-Off Total Separable Costs Total Final Sales Value M 17,000 $ 18,800 $ 230,000 N 11,000 16,400 210,000 T 12,000 3,800 39,000 Required: How much of the joint cost should be allocated to each joint product using the net realizable value method?
Y Company produces two joint products: Sweet and Sour. Joint cost is allocated using the net realizable value method at split-off point. Joint production cost is $70,000. Neither product is salable at split-off point. During May, the additional costs incurred beyond split-off point are as follows: Sweet $ 32,000 Sour $ 48,000 Production: Sweet: 3,200 units Sour: 1,600 units Selling prices: Sweet: $50.00 per unit Sour: $ 90.00 per unit What is the amount of joint cost allocated to Sweet and Sour using the NRV Method at split-off point. (Must show calculations or no credit) Joint cost allocated to Sweet: $_____________________________ Joint cost allocated to Sour:…
PT Y manufactures three products using the same production process. The costs incurred up to the split-off point are $200,000. The company decided to further process the three products before they were sold. The number of units produced (based on regular sales), the selling prices per unit of the three products at the split-off point and after further processing, and the additional processing costs are as follows. Product D E F Number of Units Produced 4,000 6,000 2,000 Selling Price at Split-Off Additional Processing Costs Selling Price after Processing $25.00 $26.60 $34.40 $14,000 $20,000 $9,000 $30.00 $31.20 $37.60 Instructions 1) Allocate the $200,000 joint cost to product D, E, and F using these methods: a. Physical-measure method (2%) b. NRV method (5%) 2) Which information is relevant to the decision on whether or not to process the products further? (2%). Explain why this information is relevant (2%). 3) Which product(s) should be processed further and which should be sold at…
Sunland Inc. produces three separate products from a common process costing $100,100. Each of the products can be sold at the split- off point or can be processed further and then sold for a higher price. Shown below are cost and selling price data for a recent period. Product 10 Product 12 Product 14 (c) Product Your answer is partially correct. Product 10 Product 12 Product 14 $ Sales Value at Split-Off Point $59,700 $ 15,800 $ 55,400 Calculate incremental profit/(loss) and determine which products should be sold at the split-off point and which should be processed further. (Enter negative amounts using either a negative sign preceding the number e.g. -45 or parentheses e.g. (45).) Incremental profit (loss) Cost to Process Further eTextbook and Media $100,100 30,800 149,700 Sales Value after Further Processing $191,000 34,700 Decision 214,000 Should be processed further Should be sold at the split-off point Should be processed further Assistance Used