a. Using the above information, compute the Net Present Value (NPV) if the company delayed the project for 1 year. b. Holding everything else constant, what is the expected NPV of the decision if the probabilities for the three scenarios (after 1 year) are as follows: high (20%), medium (48%), and low (32%)? c. From your answers in (a) and (b) above, what conclusion can be derived, and why?

FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING
10th Edition
ISBN:9781259964947
Author:Libby
Publisher:Libby
Chapter1: Financial Statements And Business Decisions
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1Q
icon
Related questions
Question
Flexcell Bhd is considering investing in the production of a new technology, a handheld
communication device, the target market is young undergraduates. The estimated
investment cost for this project is RM100 million with 3 year project life. Demand for the
product, and therefore the project risk, is a function of the demand for Internet connections.
The CFO working with marketing, currently estimates a 25% chance that such demand will
be high, a 50% probability that demand will be medium, and a 25% probability that demand
will be low. Associated after tax cash flows under each of these three market scenarios are
estimated as follows: RM70 million, RMS0 million, and RM5 million. For projects of this
nature, a 15% discount rate (equal to the firm's weighted average cost of capital) is
assumed.
Because starting the project immediately on day 1 results in negative NPV of RM0.109
million, management of the company has decided to avoid risk by delaying the
implementation of the project for 1 year, i.e. to wait and see. It will still spend RM100
million investment cost, and expects to maintain customer demands of RM70 million and
RM50 million if customer demands are high or medium respectively. However, if
customer demand turns out to be low after 1 year, then no investment will be made.
At 15% discount rate, the present value (PV) factors are: Year 1 (0.870), Year 2 (0.756),
Year 3 (0.658), Year 4 (0.572).
Required:
a. Using the above information, compute the Net Present Value (NPV) if the company
delayed the project for 1 year.
b. Holding everything else constant, what is the expected NPV of the decision if the
probabilities for the three scenarios (after 1 year) are as follows: high (20%),
medium (48%), and low (32%)?
c. From your answers in (a) and (b) above, what conclusion can be derived, and why?
Transcribed Image Text:Flexcell Bhd is considering investing in the production of a new technology, a handheld communication device, the target market is young undergraduates. The estimated investment cost for this project is RM100 million with 3 year project life. Demand for the product, and therefore the project risk, is a function of the demand for Internet connections. The CFO working with marketing, currently estimates a 25% chance that such demand will be high, a 50% probability that demand will be medium, and a 25% probability that demand will be low. Associated after tax cash flows under each of these three market scenarios are estimated as follows: RM70 million, RMS0 million, and RM5 million. For projects of this nature, a 15% discount rate (equal to the firm's weighted average cost of capital) is assumed. Because starting the project immediately on day 1 results in negative NPV of RM0.109 million, management of the company has decided to avoid risk by delaying the implementation of the project for 1 year, i.e. to wait and see. It will still spend RM100 million investment cost, and expects to maintain customer demands of RM70 million and RM50 million if customer demands are high or medium respectively. However, if customer demand turns out to be low after 1 year, then no investment will be made. At 15% discount rate, the present value (PV) factors are: Year 1 (0.870), Year 2 (0.756), Year 3 (0.658), Year 4 (0.572). Required: a. Using the above information, compute the Net Present Value (NPV) if the company delayed the project for 1 year. b. Holding everything else constant, what is the expected NPV of the decision if the probabilities for the three scenarios (after 1 year) are as follows: high (20%), medium (48%), and low (32%)? c. From your answers in (a) and (b) above, what conclusion can be derived, and why?
Expert Solution
steps

Step by step

Solved in 4 steps

Blurred answer
Knowledge Booster
Valuing Decision
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, accounting and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.
Similar questions
  • SEE MORE QUESTIONS
Recommended textbooks for you
FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING
FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING
Accounting
ISBN:
9781259964947
Author:
Libby
Publisher:
MCG
Accounting
Accounting
Accounting
ISBN:
9781337272094
Author:
WARREN, Carl S., Reeve, James M., Duchac, Jonathan E.
Publisher:
Cengage Learning,
Accounting Information Systems
Accounting Information Systems
Accounting
ISBN:
9781337619202
Author:
Hall, James A.
Publisher:
Cengage Learning,
Horngren's Cost Accounting: A Managerial Emphasis…
Horngren's Cost Accounting: A Managerial Emphasis…
Accounting
ISBN:
9780134475585
Author:
Srikant M. Datar, Madhav V. Rajan
Publisher:
PEARSON
Intermediate Accounting
Intermediate Accounting
Accounting
ISBN:
9781259722660
Author:
J. David Spiceland, Mark W. Nelson, Wayne M Thomas
Publisher:
McGraw-Hill Education
Financial and Managerial Accounting
Financial and Managerial Accounting
Accounting
ISBN:
9781259726705
Author:
John J Wild, Ken W. Shaw, Barbara Chiappetta Fundamental Accounting Principles
Publisher:
McGraw-Hill Education