A. Identify the specific constitutional clause that is common in both the NYT Co v. US (1971) and the Hazelwood v. Kuhlmeier (1988) cases. B. Based on the constitutional clause identified in part A, explain why the facts of the NYT Co v. US (1971) led to a different holding than the holding in the Hazelwood v. Kuhlmeier (1988). C. Explain an action that the Congress could take if they disagreed with the holding in Hazelwood v. Kuhlmeier (1988) to affect its impact.
A. Identify the specific constitutional clause that is common in both the NYT Co v. US (1971) and the Hazelwood v. Kuhlmeier (1988) cases. B. Based on the constitutional clause identified in part A, explain why the facts of the NYT Co v. US (1971) led to a different holding than the holding in the Hazelwood v. Kuhlmeier (1988). C. Explain an action that the Congress could take if they disagreed with the holding in Hazelwood v. Kuhlmeier (1988) to affect its impact.
Related questions
Question
100%
Transcribed Image Text:French 4 Unite 0 Le.
Q Vocab 1
Vocab 2 E Vocab 3
SCOTUS Comparison FRQ: NYT Co. v. US (1971) and Hazelwood School District v. Kuhlmeler (1988)
Hazelwood School District v. Kuhlmeier (1988)
The Spectrum, the school-sponsored newspaper of Hazelwood East High School, was written and edited by
students. In May 1983, Robert E. Reynolds, the school principal, received the pages proofs for the May 13 issue.
Reynolds found two of the articles in the issue to be inappropriate, and ordered that the pages on which the
articles appeared be withheld from publication. Cathy Kuhlmeier and two other former Hazelwood East
students brought the case to court.
In a 5-to-3 decision, the Court held that the ... did not require schools to affirmatively promote particular types
of student speech. The Court held that schools must be able to set high standards for student speech
disseminated under their auspices, and that schools retained the right to refuse to sponsor speech that was
"inconsistent with 'the shared values of a civilized social order." Educators did not offend the .. by exercising
editorial control over the content of student speech so long as their actions were "reasonably related to
legitimate pedagogical concerns." The actions of principal Reynolds, the Court held, met this test.
After reading the scenario, please respond to A, B, and C below:
A. Identify the specific constitutional clause that is common in both the NYT Co v. US (1971) and the
Hazelwood v. Kuhlmeier (1988) cases.
B. Based on the constitutional clause identified in part A, explain why the facts of the NYT Co v. US (1971) led
to a different holding than the holding in the Hazelwood v. Kuhlmeier (1988).
C. Explain an action that the Congress could take if they disagreed with the holding in Hazelwood v. Kuhlmeier
(1988) to affect its impact.
DELL
Expert Solution
This question has been solved!
Explore an expertly crafted, step-by-step solution for a thorough understanding of key concepts.
This is a popular solution!
Trending now
This is a popular solution!
Step by step
Solved in 2 steps
