Assume that two countries Canada and China produce just two goods- particle board,plywood sheets- in their economies. Also assume that there is no currency in the systemand countries, if willing to trade, just exchange the two goods. The only input being usedin the production of the goods is the Labour. Canada can produce 10 particle boards or25 plywood sheets in 100 hours. China can produce 20 particle boards or 50 plywoodsheets in 100 hours.a. Does any country have absolute advantage in the production of the goods?b. Does any country have the comparative advantage in producing the particle boards?c. Does there exist a feasible exchange rate between particle board and plywood sheet(tonnes particle board / tonnes plywood sheet)? If yes, show that if countriesspecialize and trade at this exchange rate, they can both raise their consumptionlevel.

Absolute advantage and comparative advantages are the two widely used terms in Internation Trade.…

Answered: a. Does any country have absolute…

a. Does any country have absolute advantage in the production of the goods? b. Does any country have the comparative advantage in producing the particle boards?

ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS

14th Edition

ISBN:9780190931919

Author:NEWNAN

Publisher:NEWNAN

Chapter1: Making Economics Decisions

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1QTC

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

If country ABC can produce a unit of good 1 by sacrificing fewer units of good 2 than can country XYZ, it is correct to say that country ABC A. has a comparative advantage in producing good 1. B. has an absolute advantage in producing good 1. C. will not wish to trade good 1 with country XYZ. D. will import good 1.
Which country has comparative advantage in the production of food? Explain. See attached.
England and Scotland both produce scones and sweaters. Suppose that an English works can produce 50 scones per hour or 1 sweater per hour. Suppose that a Scottish worker can produce 40 scones per hour or 2 sweaters per hour. a. Which country has the absolute advantage in the production of each good? Which country has the comparative advantage? b. If England and Scotland decide to trade, which commodity will Scotland trade to England? Explain. c. If a Scottish worker could produce only 1 sweater per hour, would Scotland still gain from trade? Would England still gain from trade? Explain.
Do you have an absolute or comparative advantage in doing something over someone else? Explain in a paragraph of 3 to 5 sentences.
Question 28 The table shows the maximum quantity of cars or motorcycles that can be produced by two countries, X and Y, using equal amounts of resources. Motorcycles Cars 10 60 20 80 Based on the data in the table, which of the following is true? A B D Country X Country Y E Country X has a comparative advantage in producing cars. Country Y has a comparative advantage in producing cars. Country X has an absolute advantage in producing cars. Country X has an absolute advantage in producing motorcycles. Country Y has a comparative advantage in producing motorcycles.
Even if neither country had a comparative advantage, why might these countries still experience gains from trade? simple plus example please
Imagine that it takes an average Australian miner 10 hours to mine a metric ton of coal and 20 hours to mine a metric ton of manganese. It takes the average South African miner 4 hours to mine a metric ton of coal and 12 hours to mine metric ton of manganese.Create a table to show how productive each miner is in a day. a. In what task does each miner have a comparative advantage? b. Which resource will each country import? How about export? c. Explain how markets provide the opportunity for the mining companies to specialize and earn gains from trade.
Assume that the US can produce corn at a lower opportunity cost than South Korea and South Korea can produce cars at a lower opportunity cost than the US. Which of the following is not true? a. south korea should specialize production in cars b. both countries have a comparative advantage c. the us should specialize production in corn d. the us has an absolute advantage in production of corn and cars
If France is said to have an absolute advantage over Mexico in the production of wheat, this means that, given the same resources, Mexico must have an absolute advantage in producing some good other than wheat. a. France can produce more wheat than Mexico. b. France has an absolute advantage in all goods that are complements to wheat. c. France must have an absolute advantage over Mexico in producing all goods. d. Mexico must have a comparative advantage over France in the production of wheat.
I don't understand the second part of this homework. If Frankie and Johnny completely specialize according to comparative advantage, what will happen to the amount of eggs and milk? I have the opportunity cost calculated to understand who should do what in this case. But what will I do to that number?
Suppose Country A can produce 200 toys or 400 pineapples per day, while Country B can produce 300 toys or 900 pineapples per day. Where do the comparative advantatges lie? Should trade take place?
Why does australia have a comparative advantage in producing wheat?