(a) When you solve an integer programming problem (suppose it is a maximization prob- lem), how do you obtain an upper bound on the optimal objective value? How do you obtain a lower bound? (b) Suppose you use a binary variable yA to represent whether or not event A will happen, and use a binary variable yYB to represent whether or not event B will happen. How do you model the following logic constraint using an inequality? If A happens → then B must happen

Calculus: Early Transcendentals
8th Edition
ISBN:9781285741550
Author:James Stewart
Publisher:James Stewart
Chapter1: Functions And Models
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1RCC: (a) What is a function? What are its domain and range? (b) What is the graph of a function? (c) How...
icon
Related questions
Question
Short answer
(a) When you solve an integer programming problem (suppose it is a maximization prob-
lem), how do you obtain an upper bound on the optimal objective value? How do you
obtain a lower bound?
(b) Suppose you use a binary variable yA to represent whether or not event A will happen,
and use a binary variable yB to represent whether or not event B will happen. How
do you model the following logic constraint using an inequality?
If A happens then B must happen
(c) In class we talked about how to model constraints like "either condition A holds
or condition B holds (or both)". How about when you have three conditions? For
example, how to model "at least one of the following three conditions should hold":
(i) 3x1+x2 > 5; (ii) 2x1+2x2 > 4; (iii) x1+3x2 > 5? (If you use big-M inequalities
here, you do not need to specify the values for the big-M parameters.)
Transcribed Image Text:(a) When you solve an integer programming problem (suppose it is a maximization prob- lem), how do you obtain an upper bound on the optimal objective value? How do you obtain a lower bound? (b) Suppose you use a binary variable yA to represent whether or not event A will happen, and use a binary variable yB to represent whether or not event B will happen. How do you model the following logic constraint using an inequality? If A happens then B must happen (c) In class we talked about how to model constraints like "either condition A holds or condition B holds (or both)". How about when you have three conditions? For example, how to model "at least one of the following three conditions should hold": (i) 3x1+x2 > 5; (ii) 2x1+2x2 > 4; (iii) x1+3x2 > 5? (If you use big-M inequalities here, you do not need to specify the values for the big-M parameters.)
Expert Solution
trending now

Trending now

This is a popular solution!

steps

Step by step

Solved in 2 steps with 2 images

Blurred answer
Recommended textbooks for you
Calculus: Early Transcendentals
Calculus: Early Transcendentals
Calculus
ISBN:
9781285741550
Author:
James Stewart
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Thomas' Calculus (14th Edition)
Thomas' Calculus (14th Edition)
Calculus
ISBN:
9780134438986
Author:
Joel R. Hass, Christopher E. Heil, Maurice D. Weir
Publisher:
PEARSON
Calculus: Early Transcendentals (3rd Edition)
Calculus: Early Transcendentals (3rd Edition)
Calculus
ISBN:
9780134763644
Author:
William L. Briggs, Lyle Cochran, Bernard Gillett, Eric Schulz
Publisher:
PEARSON
Calculus: Early Transcendentals
Calculus: Early Transcendentals
Calculus
ISBN:
9781319050740
Author:
Jon Rogawski, Colin Adams, Robert Franzosa
Publisher:
W. H. Freeman
Precalculus
Precalculus
Calculus
ISBN:
9780135189405
Author:
Michael Sullivan
Publisher:
PEARSON
Calculus: Early Transcendental Functions
Calculus: Early Transcendental Functions
Calculus
ISBN:
9781337552516
Author:
Ron Larson, Bruce H. Edwards
Publisher:
Cengage Learning