a) State the null and alternative hypotheses in terms of the appropriate parameter to test the claim that the study course improves students' SAT scores. (Use diff = post - pre.) Ho: ud o points Ha: ud o points b) The level of significance is a = 0.05 c) The test statistic is t v oo (If necessary, round your answer to the nearest hundredth.)

MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
6th Edition
ISBN:9781119256830
Author:Amos Gilat
Publisher:Amos Gilat
Chapter1: Starting With Matlab
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1P
icon
Related questions
Question
Can you help me fill in the blanks? I am stuck
### SAT Study Course Impact Analysis

A new SAT study course is tested on 12 individuals. Pre-course and post-course scores are recorded. The following data is collected:

#### Score Data

| Pre-course score | Post-course score |
|------------------|-------------------|
| 1200             | 1300              |
| 960              | 920               |
| 1010             | 1100              |
| 840              | 880               |
| 1100             | 1070              |
| 1250             | 1320              |
| 860              | 860               |
| 1330             | 1370              |
| 790              | 770               |
| 990              | 1040              |
| 1110             | 1200              |
| 740              | 850               |

### Hypothesis Testing

**a) Null and Alternative Hypotheses**

State the null and alternative hypotheses in terms of the appropriate parameter to test the claim that the study course improves students' SAT scores. Use diff = post - pre.
- Null Hypothesis (\(H_0\)): \( \mu_d = 0\) points
- Alternative Hypothesis (\(H_a\)): \( \mu_d \neq 0\) points

**b) Level of Significance**

The level of significance is \( \alpha = 0.05 \).

**c) Test Statistic**

To be calculated. It is necessary to round your answer to the nearest hundredth if required.

**d) P-value**

To be determined. If necessary, round your answer to four decimal places.

**e) Decision**

The correct decision is to either reject or fail to reject the null hypothesis based on the calculated p-value and the level of significance.

#### Detailed Explanation of Data

The table above lists the SAT scores of 12 individuals before and after they took the study course. The difference in scores will be analyzed to determine if there is a statistically significant improvement due to the course. 

**Next Steps:**
1. Calculate the mean difference in scores (`post-course score - pre-course score`).
2. Compute the standard deviation of the differences.
3. Use the mean difference and standard deviation to calculate the test statistic (often a t-test) and the p-value.
4. Compare the p-value with the significance level (\(\alpha\)) to draw a conclusion about the null hypothesis.

This analysis helps
Transcribed Image Text:### SAT Study Course Impact Analysis A new SAT study course is tested on 12 individuals. Pre-course and post-course scores are recorded. The following data is collected: #### Score Data | Pre-course score | Post-course score | |------------------|-------------------| | 1200 | 1300 | | 960 | 920 | | 1010 | 1100 | | 840 | 880 | | 1100 | 1070 | | 1250 | 1320 | | 860 | 860 | | 1330 | 1370 | | 790 | 770 | | 990 | 1040 | | 1110 | 1200 | | 740 | 850 | ### Hypothesis Testing **a) Null and Alternative Hypotheses** State the null and alternative hypotheses in terms of the appropriate parameter to test the claim that the study course improves students' SAT scores. Use diff = post - pre. - Null Hypothesis (\(H_0\)): \( \mu_d = 0\) points - Alternative Hypothesis (\(H_a\)): \( \mu_d \neq 0\) points **b) Level of Significance** The level of significance is \( \alpha = 0.05 \). **c) Test Statistic** To be calculated. It is necessary to round your answer to the nearest hundredth if required. **d) P-value** To be determined. If necessary, round your answer to four decimal places. **e) Decision** The correct decision is to either reject or fail to reject the null hypothesis based on the calculated p-value and the level of significance. #### Detailed Explanation of Data The table above lists the SAT scores of 12 individuals before and after they took the study course. The difference in scores will be analyzed to determine if there is a statistically significant improvement due to the course. **Next Steps:** 1. Calculate the mean difference in scores (`post-course score - pre-course score`). 2. Compute the standard deviation of the differences. 3. Use the mean difference and standard deviation to calculate the test statistic (often a t-test) and the p-value. 4. Compare the p-value with the significance level (\(\alpha\)) to draw a conclusion about the null hypothesis. This analysis helps
### Statistical Analysis of SAT Study Course Effectiveness

This section presents the statistical analysis and decision-making process regarding the effectiveness of an SAT study course. The following points summarize the steps and conclusions drawn from the analysis:

**e) Decision Regarding the Null Hypothesis:**
- The correct decision is to **reject** the null hypothesis.

**f) Evidence of Score Improvement:**
- There is **sufficient** (dropdown selection) evidence that the average score increased after taking the SAT study course.

**g) Confidence Interval for Score Improvement:**
- We are 95% confident that the average score improved between \[\] and \[\] points. (If necessary, round your answers to the nearest hundredth.)

While there are no graphs or diagrams present in this image, the analysis relies on statistical methods to determine whether the SAT study course effectively improves the average scores of participants. The confidence interval provides a range within which we expect the true average improvement to lie, with 95% certainty.

To proceed, you can submit your answer by clicking on the "Submit Question" button.

---

This textual analysis is beneficial for understanding how statistical decisions and interpretations are made in the context of educational interventions, like SAT study programs.
Transcribed Image Text:### Statistical Analysis of SAT Study Course Effectiveness This section presents the statistical analysis and decision-making process regarding the effectiveness of an SAT study course. The following points summarize the steps and conclusions drawn from the analysis: **e) Decision Regarding the Null Hypothesis:** - The correct decision is to **reject** the null hypothesis. **f) Evidence of Score Improvement:** - There is **sufficient** (dropdown selection) evidence that the average score increased after taking the SAT study course. **g) Confidence Interval for Score Improvement:** - We are 95% confident that the average score improved between \[\] and \[\] points. (If necessary, round your answers to the nearest hundredth.) While there are no graphs or diagrams present in this image, the analysis relies on statistical methods to determine whether the SAT study course effectively improves the average scores of participants. The confidence interval provides a range within which we expect the true average improvement to lie, with 95% certainty. To proceed, you can submit your answer by clicking on the "Submit Question" button. --- This textual analysis is beneficial for understanding how statistical decisions and interpretations are made in the context of educational interventions, like SAT study programs.
Expert Solution
trending now

Trending now

This is a popular solution!

steps

Step by step

Solved in 2 steps with 2 images

Blurred answer
Knowledge Booster
Laplace Transformation
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, statistics and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.
Recommended textbooks for you
MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
Statistics
ISBN:
9781119256830
Author:
Amos Gilat
Publisher:
John Wiley & Sons Inc
Probability and Statistics for Engineering and th…
Probability and Statistics for Engineering and th…
Statistics
ISBN:
9781305251809
Author:
Jay L. Devore
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Statistics for The Behavioral Sciences (MindTap C…
Statistics for The Behavioral Sciences (MindTap C…
Statistics
ISBN:
9781305504912
Author:
Frederick J Gravetter, Larry B. Wallnau
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Elementary Statistics: Picturing the World (7th E…
Elementary Statistics: Picturing the World (7th E…
Statistics
ISBN:
9780134683416
Author:
Ron Larson, Betsy Farber
Publisher:
PEARSON
The Basic Practice of Statistics
The Basic Practice of Statistics
Statistics
ISBN:
9781319042578
Author:
David S. Moore, William I. Notz, Michael A. Fligner
Publisher:
W. H. Freeman
Introduction to the Practice of Statistics
Introduction to the Practice of Statistics
Statistics
ISBN:
9781319013387
Author:
David S. Moore, George P. McCabe, Bruce A. Craig
Publisher:
W. H. Freeman