what is the mathematical way to solving this, i used the slope formula but i dont know if that is the way to get answer. A small economy increased its capital per hour worked (K/L) from $40,000 to $50,000. As a result,real GDP per worker (Y/L) grew from $20,000 to $25,000. If the economy increases its capital perhour worked by another $10,000O to $60,000, but there is no change in technology, by how muchmore and in what direction will output per worker change?Output per worker will increase by exactly $5,000Output per worker will increase by more than $5,000O Output per worker will increase by less than $5,000O Output per worker will fall by more than $5,000

Real GDP is a economics live of the worth of economic output that has been adjusted for value…

A small economy increased its capital per hour worked (K/L) from $40,000 to $50,000. As a result real GDP per worker (Y/L) grew from $20,000 to $25,000. If the economy increases its capital per hour worked by another $10,000 to $60,000, but there is no change in technology, by how much more and in what direction will output per worker change? Output per worker will increase by exactly $5,000 Output per worker will increase by more than $5,000 Output per worker will increase by less than $5,000 Output per worker will fall by more than $5,000

A small economy increased its capital per hour worked (K/L) from $40,000 to $50,000. As a result real GDP per worker (Y/L) grew from $20,000 to $25,000. If the economy increases its capital per hour worked by another $10,000 to $60,000, but there is no change in technology, by how much more and in what direction will output per worker change? Output per worker will increase by exactly $5,000 Output per worker will increase by more than $5,000 Output per worker will increase by less than $5,000 Output per worker will fall by more than $5,000

Economics (MindTap Course List)

13th Edition

ISBN:9781337617383

Author:Roger A. Arnold

Publisher:Roger A. Arnold

Chapter17: Economic Growth: Resources, Technology, Ideas And Institutions

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 6WNG

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

A country faces diminishing marginal returns when increasing it's capital stock. If this country added 100 units of capital last year and saw their GDP rise by $1,000 per person, what would you expect to happen if they had added 200 units of capital instead? O It is impossible to tell what would happen GDP would increase by less than another $1,000 per person GDP would increase by another $1,000 per person GDP would increase by more than another $1,000 per person
A country faces diminishing marginal returns when increasing it's capital stock. If this country added 1,000 units of capital last year and saw their GDP rise by $500 per person, what would you expect to happen if they had added 2,000 units of capital instead? O GDP would increase by another $500 per person O GDP would increase by less than another $500 per person O GDP would increase by more than another $500 per person O It is impossible to tell what would happen What is a potential downside of using patents to promote the creation of new technology? Without a market test, patents might be given to technology which ends up being useless. O Government money may be directed towards unproductive goals. It slows the spread and development of those ideas by restricting competition. They prohibit competition forever. What is the law of diminishing marginal returns?
What were the sources of labor productivity growth in the U.S. economy during the sixty years since 1960? How did the 1960s differ from the more recent decades? During the sixty years since 1960, the sources of labor productivity growth include O A. plastics, the laser, and the computer during the 1960s, and the Internet during later years O B. the focus on saving energy during the 1970s O C. the wide-spread introduction of the Internet during the 1970s O D. the global financial turmoil of 2008-2009 that made labor more productive Comparing the 1960s to the more recent decades, labor productivity growth than in subsequent decades. O A. in the 1960s was approximately 25 percent higher O B. in the 1960s was smaller C. due to technological change was smaller in the 1960s O D. due to physical capital and human capital growth was greater in the 1960s Click to select your answer. MacBook A
The graph below shows three production functions. PFO shows the current production function for the economy, and capital per worker is currently (K/L)o; thus ouput per worker is (Y/L)o. Suppose that there is a decrease in capital per worker. Which of the points on the graph could show the new capital per worker and output per worker? A. 3 O C. 1 Click to select your answer. B. 2 D. 4 Real GDP per hour worked, Y/L (Y/L)o 2 0 3 (K/L)o Capital per hour worked, K/L PF1 PF0 PF₂
Question 22 Here are hypothetical data for Germany and Japan on average labor productivity, the number of persons employed, and population in a given year: Average labor |productivity S88,204 $44,216 Number of persons employed 32.36 million 50.48 million than that of Germany by approximately . Population 78.17 million 104.3 million Germany Japan Japan's real GDP per person is O lower; $15,114 O higher; $121,711 O lower; $121,711 O higher; $15,114
Figure 11-4 Real GDP per hour worked, Y/L $17,000 16,400 16,000 15,000 $50,000 B E 60,000 70,000 Production function3 Production function2 Production function Capital per hour worked, K/L 16) Refer to Figure 11-4. The movement from E to B to D in the figure above illustrates A) an improvement in technology. B) a decline in capital per worker. C) diminishing returns to capital. D) diminishing returns to labor.
13. Starting at point B in the diagram below, identify which combinations of points illustrate technological change. Give a brief explanation to support your answer. Real GDP per hour worked, Y/L $17,000 16,400 16,000 15,000 $50,000 B E 60,000 70,000 Production function3 Production function2 Production function₁ Capital per hour J Ka
Explain how an increase in human capital changes labor productivity. Do diminishing returns arise? Real GDP per hour of labor (2012 dollars) 32- Provide an example of an increase in human capital. 28- An increase in human capital labor productivity and the diminishing returns to capital. 24- O A. decreases; does not eliminate O B. increases; eliminates 20- O C. increases; sometimes eliminates and sometimes does not eliminate 16- O D. increases; does not eliminate 12- E. decreases; eliminates 8- An example of an increase in human capital is 4- O A. attending college OB. your labor productivity increases 40 0. 80 120 160 200 240 Capital per hour of labor (2012 dollars) O C. you work more hours at your part-time job D. your college buys more computers >>> Draw only the objects specified in the question. In the graph, draw a productivity curve. Label it PCo. Draw a point to show real GDP per hour of labor when capital per hour of labor is $120. Label it 1. Then illustrate the effect of an…
Use the below graph to answer the question: Output per labour Production D function 3 Production function 2 B Production function 1 A E Capital per labour Which of the following events will lead the economy to move from point A to E? O a. A permanent increase in soil salinity levels which reduces agricultural output. O b.A drop in export demand. C. Some infrastructure is destroyed by an earthquake. O d. An increase in income tax. O e. The retirement of unproductive machines.
Assume an economy where there are two producers: a wheat producer and a bread producer. In agiven year, the wheat producer grows 3 million tonnes of wheat, of which 2.5 million tonnes aresold to the bread producer at $30 per bushel, and 0.5 million tonnes are stored by the wheatproducer to use as seed for next years crop. The bread producer produces and sells 100 millionloaves of bread to consumers for $3.50 per loaf. Determine GDP in this economy during this yearusing the product and expenditure approaches.
Consider the per-worker production function graph. If there is an increase in capital per hour worked, holding technology constant, then O A. there is a movement from A to B. O B. there is a movement from D to C. O C. there is a movement from A to C. O D. there is a movement from B to D. If there is an increase in technology, holding constant the quantity of capital per hour worked, then O A. there is a movement from A to C. O B. there is a movement from C to D. O C. there is a movement from D to B. O D. there is a movement from A to B. Real GDP per hour worked (Y/L) YIL₂ YIL₁ Per-worker Production function₂ C D B A Per-worker Production function KIL₁ KIL2 Capital per hour worked (K/L)
Say that the average worker in Canada has a productivity level of 30 per hour while the average worker in the United Kingdom has a productivity level of 25 per hour (both measured in U.S. dollars). Over the next five years, say that worker productivity in Canada grows at 1 per year while worker productivity in the UK grows 3 per year. After five years, whiz) will have the higher productivity level, and by how much?