A seller offers to sell an object to a buyer. The buyer and seller's valuations for the object, t and u,, are independent and uniformly distributed on [0, 1]. Each knows her own valuation but not the valuation of the other. Trade proceeds as follows. The buyer and seller simultaneously choose prices ps and ps, respectively. You may think of ps as the amount the buyer is offering to pay for the object, and p, as the minimum amount the seller will accept. If ps2 ps, then trade occurs at price ps. If ps < Ps, then no trade occurs. If no trade occurs, the payoff to the buyer is 0 and to the seller is v.. If trade occurs at price p, the payoff to the buyer is t-p and to the seller is p.

ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS
14th Edition
ISBN:9780190931919
Author:NEWNAN
Publisher:NEWNAN
Chapter1: Making Economics Decisions
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1QTC
icon
Related questions
Question


PLEASE CHECK THIS  HOW TO SOLVE

A seller offers to sell an object to a buyer. The buyer and seller's valuations for the object,
and us, are independent and uniformly distributed on [0, 1]. Each knows her own valuation but
not the valuation of the other. Trade proceeds as follows. The buyer and seller simultaneously
choose prices p, and p₁, respectively. You may think of p, as the amount the buyer is offering
to pay for the object, and p, as the minimum amount the seller will accept. If po≥ Ps, then
trade occurs at price ps. If p < Ps, then no trade occurs. If no trade occurs, the payoff to
the buyer is 0 and to the seller is us. If trade occurs at price p, the payoff to the buyer is
U-p and to the seller is p.
(a) Find a Nash equilibrium of this game in which both players use strategies that are linear
in their valuation and the seller's strategy is not weakly dominated.
Solution: By the same argument as in a second-price auction with private values, the
strategy Ps(vs) = U, is weakly dominant for the seller. If the seller uses that strategy, a
buyer of type v, who chooses p, € [0, 1] receives a payoff of
Pr(p ≥ vs) (vb - Pb) = Pb(v₁ - Pb).
Since this is maximized when p = vb/2, the strategy profile (ps(vb), p.(vs)) given by
ps(vb) = vb/2 and p.(vs) = v, is a Nash equilibrium.
(b) Explain whether the equilibrium you found is efficient.
Solution: The efficient outcome is for trade to occur whenever > vs. In the equilib-
rium, trade only occurs if v 2vs. Therefore, the equilibrium involves less trade than
would be efficient.
(c) Find a Nash equilibrium in which each player always chooses one of two prices (note
that the two prices may be different for the two players).
Solution: One such equilibrium is for the seller to choose ps = 1 if vs > 1/2 and
Ps= = 1/2 if v, ≤ 1/2, and the buyer to choose p = 0 if v < 1/2 and pt = 1/2 if
2 ≥ 1/2.
Transcribed Image Text:A seller offers to sell an object to a buyer. The buyer and seller's valuations for the object, and us, are independent and uniformly distributed on [0, 1]. Each knows her own valuation but not the valuation of the other. Trade proceeds as follows. The buyer and seller simultaneously choose prices p, and p₁, respectively. You may think of p, as the amount the buyer is offering to pay for the object, and p, as the minimum amount the seller will accept. If po≥ Ps, then trade occurs at price ps. If p < Ps, then no trade occurs. If no trade occurs, the payoff to the buyer is 0 and to the seller is us. If trade occurs at price p, the payoff to the buyer is U-p and to the seller is p. (a) Find a Nash equilibrium of this game in which both players use strategies that are linear in their valuation and the seller's strategy is not weakly dominated. Solution: By the same argument as in a second-price auction with private values, the strategy Ps(vs) = U, is weakly dominant for the seller. If the seller uses that strategy, a buyer of type v, who chooses p, € [0, 1] receives a payoff of Pr(p ≥ vs) (vb - Pb) = Pb(v₁ - Pb). Since this is maximized when p = vb/2, the strategy profile (ps(vb), p.(vs)) given by ps(vb) = vb/2 and p.(vs) = v, is a Nash equilibrium. (b) Explain whether the equilibrium you found is efficient. Solution: The efficient outcome is for trade to occur whenever > vs. In the equilib- rium, trade only occurs if v 2vs. Therefore, the equilibrium involves less trade than would be efficient. (c) Find a Nash equilibrium in which each player always chooses one of two prices (note that the two prices may be different for the two players). Solution: One such equilibrium is for the seller to choose ps = 1 if vs > 1/2 and Ps= = 1/2 if v, ≤ 1/2, and the buyer to choose p = 0 if v < 1/2 and pt = 1/2 if 2 ≥ 1/2.
Expert Solution
trending now

Trending now

This is a popular solution!

steps

Step by step

Solved in 4 steps

Blurred answer
Knowledge Booster
Methods For Reducing Risk And Uncertainty
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, economics and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.
Recommended textbooks for you
ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS
ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS
Economics
ISBN:
9780190931919
Author:
NEWNAN
Publisher:
Oxford University Press
Principles of Economics (12th Edition)
Principles of Economics (12th Edition)
Economics
ISBN:
9780134078779
Author:
Karl E. Case, Ray C. Fair, Sharon E. Oster
Publisher:
PEARSON
Engineering Economy (17th Edition)
Engineering Economy (17th Edition)
Economics
ISBN:
9780134870069
Author:
William G. Sullivan, Elin M. Wicks, C. Patrick Koelling
Publisher:
PEARSON
Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)
Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)
Economics
ISBN:
9781305585126
Author:
N. Gregory Mankiw
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics: A Problem Solving Approach
Managerial Economics: A Problem Solving Approach
Economics
ISBN:
9781337106665
Author:
Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike Shor
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics & Business Strategy (Mcgraw-…
Managerial Economics & Business Strategy (Mcgraw-…
Economics
ISBN:
9781259290619
Author:
Michael Baye, Jeff Prince
Publisher:
McGraw-Hill Education