A sand cone test has been performed in a recently compacted fill. The test results obtained are as follows: Initial weight of sand cone + sand = 13.51 lb Final weight of sand cone + sand = 4.26 lb Weight of sand to fill cone = 2.12 lb Weight of soil from hole + bucket = 12.42 lb Weight of bucket = 1.21 lb Moisture content test: Mass of empty moisture content can = 23.11 g Mass of moist soil + can = = 273.93 g Mass of oven-dried soil + can = 250.10 g The sand used in the sand cone had a unit weight of 81.0 lb/ft³, and the fill had a maximum dry unit weight of 121 lb/ft³ and an optimum moisture content of 11.7%, based on the modified Proctor test. Compute the relative compaction based on the modified Proctor test.
A sand cone test has been performed in a recently compacted fill. The test results obtained are as follows: Initial weight of sand cone + sand = 13.51 lb Final weight of sand cone + sand = 4.26 lb Weight of sand to fill cone = 2.12 lb Weight of soil from hole + bucket = 12.42 lb Weight of bucket = 1.21 lb Moisture content test: Mass of empty moisture content can = 23.11 g Mass of moist soil + can = = 273.93 g Mass of oven-dried soil + can = 250.10 g The sand used in the sand cone had a unit weight of 81.0 lb/ft³, and the fill had a maximum dry unit weight of 121 lb/ft³ and an optimum moisture content of 11.7%, based on the modified Proctor test. Compute the relative compaction based on the modified Proctor test.
Chapter2: Loads On Structures
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1P
Related questions
Question
![A sand cone test has been performed in a recently compacted fill. The test results
obtained are as follows:
Initial weight of sand cone + sand = 13.51 lb
Final weight of sand cone + sand = 4.26 lb
Weight of sand to fill cone = 2.12 lb
Weight of soil from hole + bucket = 12.42 lb
Weight of bucket = 1.21 lb
Moisture content test:
Mass of empty moisture content can = 23.11 g
Mass of moist soil + can = = 273.93 g
Mass of oven-dried soil + can = 250.10 g
The sand used in the sand cone had a unit weight of 81.0 lb/ft³, and the fill had a
maximum dry unit weight of 121 lb/ft³ and an optimum moisture content of 11.7%, based
on the modified Proctor test. Compute the relative compaction based on the modified
Proctor test.](/v2/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcontent.bartleby.com%2Fqna-images%2Fquestion%2Fb29ff817-7b8d-4056-886e-42f43ca6da22%2F491b60f5-3f78-4dbf-bef6-829d8c0ef629%2Fop6pdjj_processed.jpeg&w=3840&q=75)
Transcribed Image Text:A sand cone test has been performed in a recently compacted fill. The test results
obtained are as follows:
Initial weight of sand cone + sand = 13.51 lb
Final weight of sand cone + sand = 4.26 lb
Weight of sand to fill cone = 2.12 lb
Weight of soil from hole + bucket = 12.42 lb
Weight of bucket = 1.21 lb
Moisture content test:
Mass of empty moisture content can = 23.11 g
Mass of moist soil + can = = 273.93 g
Mass of oven-dried soil + can = 250.10 g
The sand used in the sand cone had a unit weight of 81.0 lb/ft³, and the fill had a
maximum dry unit weight of 121 lb/ft³ and an optimum moisture content of 11.7%, based
on the modified Proctor test. Compute the relative compaction based on the modified
Proctor test.
Expert Solution
![](/static/compass_v2/shared-icons/check-mark.png)
This question has been solved!
Explore an expertly crafted, step-by-step solution for a thorough understanding of key concepts.
This is a popular solution!
Trending now
This is a popular solution!
Step by step
Solved in 1 steps with 3 images
![Blurred answer](/static/compass_v2/solution-images/blurred-answer.jpg)
Recommended textbooks for you
![Structural Analysis](https://compass-isbn-assets.s3.amazonaws.com/isbn_cover_images/9781337630931/9781337630931_smallCoverImage.jpg)
![Structural Analysis (10th Edition)](https://www.bartleby.com/isbn_cover_images/9780134610672/9780134610672_smallCoverImage.gif)
Structural Analysis (10th Edition)
Civil Engineering
ISBN:
9780134610672
Author:
Russell C. Hibbeler
Publisher:
PEARSON
![Principles of Foundation Engineering (MindTap Cou…](https://www.bartleby.com/isbn_cover_images/9781337705028/9781337705028_smallCoverImage.gif)
Principles of Foundation Engineering (MindTap Cou…
Civil Engineering
ISBN:
9781337705028
Author:
Braja M. Das, Nagaratnam Sivakugan
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
![Structural Analysis](https://compass-isbn-assets.s3.amazonaws.com/isbn_cover_images/9781337630931/9781337630931_smallCoverImage.jpg)
![Structural Analysis (10th Edition)](https://www.bartleby.com/isbn_cover_images/9780134610672/9780134610672_smallCoverImage.gif)
Structural Analysis (10th Edition)
Civil Engineering
ISBN:
9780134610672
Author:
Russell C. Hibbeler
Publisher:
PEARSON
![Principles of Foundation Engineering (MindTap Cou…](https://www.bartleby.com/isbn_cover_images/9781337705028/9781337705028_smallCoverImage.gif)
Principles of Foundation Engineering (MindTap Cou…
Civil Engineering
ISBN:
9781337705028
Author:
Braja M. Das, Nagaratnam Sivakugan
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
![Fundamentals of Structural Analysis](https://www.bartleby.com/isbn_cover_images/9780073398006/9780073398006_smallCoverImage.gif)
Fundamentals of Structural Analysis
Civil Engineering
ISBN:
9780073398006
Author:
Kenneth M. Leet Emeritus, Chia-Ming Uang, Joel Lanning
Publisher:
McGraw-Hill Education
![Sustainable Energy](https://www.bartleby.com/isbn_cover_images/9781337551663/9781337551663_smallCoverImage.gif)
![Traffic and Highway Engineering](https://www.bartleby.com/isbn_cover_images/9781305156241/9781305156241_smallCoverImage.jpg)
Traffic and Highway Engineering
Civil Engineering
ISBN:
9781305156241
Author:
Garber, Nicholas J.
Publisher:
Cengage Learning