Homework Help is Here – Start Your Trial Now!
Math
Statistics
A researcher wants to know whether athletic women are more flexible than non-athletic women For this experiment, a woman who exercised vigorously at least four times per week was considered "athletic". Flexibility is measured in inches on a sit & reach box. A researcher tested his claim using the following summary statistics. Athletic women Non-athletic women n = 50 n=30 X=4.6 inches s=0.8 inches Assume that all conditions for testing have been met t = 1.626; p = 0.057, At the 1% significance level, state your decision regarding the null hypothesis and your conclusion about the original claim 5.0 inches s=1.4 inches C OA. Fail to reject the null hypothesis, there is not strong enough evidence to suggest that athletic women are more flexible, on average, than non-athletic women. OB. Fail to reject the null hypothesis, there is strong evidence to suggest that non-athletic women are more flexible, on average, than athletic women. OC. Reject the null hypothesis, there is strong evidence to suggest that non-athletic women are more flexible, on average, than athletic women. OD. Reject the null hypothesis; there is strong evidence to suggest that athletic women are more flexible, on average, than non-athletic women

A researcher wants to know whether athletic women are more flexible than non-athletic women For this experiment, a woman who exercised vigorously at least four times per week was considered "athletic". Flexibility is measured in inches on a sit & reach box. A researcher tested his claim using the following summary statistics. Athletic women Non-athletic women n = 50 n=30 X=4.6 inches s=0.8 inches Assume that all conditions for testing have been met t = 1.626; p = 0.057, At the 1% significance level, state your decision regarding the null hypothesis and your conclusion about the original claim 5.0 inches s=1.4 inches C OA. Fail to reject the null hypothesis, there is not strong enough evidence to suggest that athletic women are more flexible, on average, than non-athletic women. OB. Fail to reject the null hypothesis, there is strong evidence to suggest that non-athletic women are more flexible, on average, than athletic women. OC. Reject the null hypothesis, there is strong evidence to suggest that non-athletic women are more flexible, on average, than athletic women. OD. Reject the null hypothesis; there is strong evidence to suggest that athletic women are more flexible, on average, than non-athletic women

MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
6th Edition
ISBN:9781119256830
Author:Amos Gilat
Publisher:Amos Gilat
Chapter1: Starting With Matlab
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1P
See similar textbooks
icon
Related questions
Question
A researcher wants to know whether athletic women are more flexible than non-athletic women. For this experiment, a woman who exercised vigorously at least four times per week was considered “athletic.” Flexibility is measured in inches on a sit & reach box. A researcher tested his claim using the following summary statistics: | | Athletic women | Non-athletic women | |------------------------|----------------|--------------------| | Sample size (\(n\)) | 50 | 30 | | Mean (\(\bar{x}\)) | 5.0 inches | 4.6 inches | | Standard deviation (\(s\)) | 1.4 inches | 0.8 inches | Assume that all conditions for testing have been met: \( t = 1.626, p = 0.057 \). At the 1% significance level, state your decision regarding the null hypothesis and your conclusion about the original claim. - **A.** Fail to reject the null hypothesis; there is not strong enough evidence to suggest that athletic women are more flexible, on average, than non-athletic women. - **B.** Fail to reject the null hypothesis; there is strong evidence to suggest that non-athletic women are more flexible, on average, than athletic women. - **C.** Reject the null hypothesis; there is strong evidence to suggest that non-athletic women are more flexible, on average, than athletic women. - **D.** Reject the null hypothesis; there is strong evidence to suggest that athletic women are more flexible, on average, than non-athletic women.
Transcribed Image Text:A researcher wants to know whether athletic women are more flexible than non-athletic women. For this experiment, a woman who exercised vigorously at least four times per week was considered “athletic.” Flexibility is measured in inches on a sit & reach box. A researcher tested his claim using the following summary statistics: | | Athletic women | Non-athletic women | |------------------------|----------------|--------------------| | Sample size (\(n\)) | 50 | 30 | | Mean (\(\bar{x}\)) | 5.0 inches | 4.6 inches | | Standard deviation (\(s\)) | 1.4 inches | 0.8 inches | Assume that all conditions for testing have been met: \( t = 1.626, p = 0.057 \). At the 1% significance level, state your decision regarding the null hypothesis and your conclusion about the original claim. - **A.** Fail to reject the null hypothesis; there is not strong enough evidence to suggest that athletic women are more flexible, on average, than non-athletic women. - **B.** Fail to reject the null hypothesis; there is strong evidence to suggest that non-athletic women are more flexible, on average, than athletic women. - **C.** Reject the null hypothesis; there is strong evidence to suggest that non-athletic women are more flexible, on average, than athletic women. - **D.** Reject the null hypothesis; there is strong evidence to suggest that athletic women are more flexible, on average, than non-athletic women.
Expert Solution
trending now

Trending now

This is a popular solution!

steps

Step by step

Solved in 2 steps

SEE SOLUTIONCheck out a sample Q&A here
Blurred answer
Similar questions
Recommended textbooks for you
MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
Statistics
ISBN:
9781119256830
Author:
Amos Gilat
Publisher:
John Wiley & Sons Inc
Probability and Statistics for Engineering and th…
Probability and Statistics for Engineering and th…
Statistics
ISBN:
9781305251809
Author:
Jay L. Devore
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Statistics for The Behavioral Sciences (MindTap C…
Statistics for The Behavioral Sciences (MindTap C…
Statistics
ISBN:
9781305504912
Author:
Frederick J Gravetter, Larry B. Wallnau
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Elementary Statistics: Picturing the World (7th E…
Elementary Statistics: Picturing the World (7th E…
Statistics
ISBN:
9780134683416
Author:
Ron Larson, Betsy Farber
Publisher:
PEARSON
The Basic Practice of Statistics
The Basic Practice of Statistics
Statistics
ISBN:
9781319042578
Author:
David S. Moore, William I. Notz, Michael A. Fligner
Publisher:
W. H. Freeman
Introduction to the Practice of Statistics
Introduction to the Practice of Statistics
Statistics
ISBN:
9781319013387
Author:
David S. Moore, George P. McCabe, Bruce A. Craig
Publisher:
W. H. Freeman
SEE MORE TEXTBOOKS