A random sample of likely voters showed that 61% planned to vote for Candidate X, with a margin of error of 3 percentage points and with 95% confidence. a. Use a carefully worded sentence to report the 95% confidence interval for the percentage of voters who plan to vote for Candidate X. b. Is there evidence that Candidate X could lose? c. Suppose the survey was taken on the streets of a particular city and the candidate was running for president of the country that city is in. Explain how that would affect your conclusion. a. Which of the following statements best describes the confidence interval for the percentage of voters who plan to vote for Candidate X? A. I am 95% confident that the population percentage of voters supporting Candidate X is between 61% and 64%. B. I am 95% confident that the population percentage of voters supporting Candidate X is between 58% and 61%. O C. I am 95% confident that the population percentage of voters not supporting Candidate X is between 58% and 64%. OD. I am 95% confident that the population percentage of voters supporting Candidate X is between 58% and 64%. b. Is there evidence that Candidate X could lose? O A. There is evidence that the candidate could lose. The reason there is evidence is because the interval is entirely above 50%. O B. There is no evidence that the candidate could lose. The reason there is no evidence is because the interval is entirely above 50%. OC. There is evidence that the candidate could lose. The reason there is evidence is because the margin of error is 3%. D. There is no evidence that the candidate could lose. The reason there is no evidence is because 61% of the sample voters planned to vote for Candidate X. c. Which of the following is the best explanation on how the survey would affect your conclusion? OA. A sample from this particular city would not be representative of the entire country and would be helpful in this context. B. A sample from this particular city would be representative of the entire country and would be worthless in this context. OC. A sample from this particular city would not be representative of the entire country and would be worthless in this context. D. A sample from this particular citv would be representative of the entire country and would be helpful in this context.

MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
6th Edition
ISBN:9781119256830
Author:Amos Gilat
Publisher:Amos Gilat
Chapter1: Starting With Matlab
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1P
icon
Related questions
Question

A please and thank you

A random sample of likely voters showed that 61% planned to vote for Candidate X, with a margin of error of 3 percentage points and
with 95% confidence.
a. Use a carefully worded sentence to report the 95% confidence interval for the percentage of voters who plan to vote for Candidate
X.
b. Is there evidence that Candidate X could lose?
c. Suppose the survey was taken on the streets of a particular city and the candidate was running for president of the country that city
is in. Explain how that would affect your conclusion.
a. Which of the following statements best describes the confidence interval for the percentage of voters who plan to vote for
Candidate X?
A. I am 95% confident that the population percentage of voters supporting Candidate X is between 61% and 64%.
B. I am 95% confident that the population percentage of voters supporting Candidate X is between 58% and 61%.
C. I am 95% confident that the population percentage of voters not supporting Candidate X is between 58% and 64%.
D. I am 95% confident that the population percentage of voters supporting Candidate X is between 58% and 64%.
b. Is there evidence that Candidate X could lose?
A. There is evidence that the candidate could lose. The reason there is evidence is because the interval is entirely above 50%.
B. There is no evidence that the candidate could lose. The reason there is no evidence is because the interval is entirely above
50%.
C. There is evidence that the candidate could lose. The reason there is evidence is because the margin of error is 3%.
D. There is no evidence that the candidate could lose. The reason there is no evidence is because 61% of the sample voters
planned to vote for Candidate X.
c. Which of the following is the best explanation on how the survey would affect your conclusion?
A. A sample from this particular city would not be representative of the entire country and would be helpful in this context.
B. A sample from this particular city would be representative of the entire country and would be worthless in this context.
C. A sample from this particular city would not be representative of the entire country and would be worthless in this context.
D. A sample from this particular city would be representative of the entire country and would be helpful in this context.
Transcribed Image Text:A random sample of likely voters showed that 61% planned to vote for Candidate X, with a margin of error of 3 percentage points and with 95% confidence. a. Use a carefully worded sentence to report the 95% confidence interval for the percentage of voters who plan to vote for Candidate X. b. Is there evidence that Candidate X could lose? c. Suppose the survey was taken on the streets of a particular city and the candidate was running for president of the country that city is in. Explain how that would affect your conclusion. a. Which of the following statements best describes the confidence interval for the percentage of voters who plan to vote for Candidate X? A. I am 95% confident that the population percentage of voters supporting Candidate X is between 61% and 64%. B. I am 95% confident that the population percentage of voters supporting Candidate X is between 58% and 61%. C. I am 95% confident that the population percentage of voters not supporting Candidate X is between 58% and 64%. D. I am 95% confident that the population percentage of voters supporting Candidate X is between 58% and 64%. b. Is there evidence that Candidate X could lose? A. There is evidence that the candidate could lose. The reason there is evidence is because the interval is entirely above 50%. B. There is no evidence that the candidate could lose. The reason there is no evidence is because the interval is entirely above 50%. C. There is evidence that the candidate could lose. The reason there is evidence is because the margin of error is 3%. D. There is no evidence that the candidate could lose. The reason there is no evidence is because 61% of the sample voters planned to vote for Candidate X. c. Which of the following is the best explanation on how the survey would affect your conclusion? A. A sample from this particular city would not be representative of the entire country and would be helpful in this context. B. A sample from this particular city would be representative of the entire country and would be worthless in this context. C. A sample from this particular city would not be representative of the entire country and would be worthless in this context. D. A sample from this particular city would be representative of the entire country and would be helpful in this context.
Expert Solution
trending now

Trending now

This is a popular solution!

steps

Step by step

Solved in 2 steps with 1 images

Blurred answer
Recommended textbooks for you
MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
Statistics
ISBN:
9781119256830
Author:
Amos Gilat
Publisher:
John Wiley & Sons Inc
Probability and Statistics for Engineering and th…
Probability and Statistics for Engineering and th…
Statistics
ISBN:
9781305251809
Author:
Jay L. Devore
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Statistics for The Behavioral Sciences (MindTap C…
Statistics for The Behavioral Sciences (MindTap C…
Statistics
ISBN:
9781305504912
Author:
Frederick J Gravetter, Larry B. Wallnau
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Elementary Statistics: Picturing the World (7th E…
Elementary Statistics: Picturing the World (7th E…
Statistics
ISBN:
9780134683416
Author:
Ron Larson, Betsy Farber
Publisher:
PEARSON
The Basic Practice of Statistics
The Basic Practice of Statistics
Statistics
ISBN:
9781319042578
Author:
David S. Moore, William I. Notz, Michael A. Fligner
Publisher:
W. H. Freeman
Introduction to the Practice of Statistics
Introduction to the Practice of Statistics
Statistics
ISBN:
9781319013387
Author:
David S. Moore, George P. McCabe, Bruce A. Craig
Publisher:
W. H. Freeman