(a) Prove that Vr € R, ze Q⇒ (x + 1) E Q. Hint: go back to the definition of Q, and show that if a satisfies that definition, then so does (x + 1). (b) Prove that Vr € R, z Q⇒ (x + 1) # Q. Hint: can you prove the contrapositive of this (c) statement? Prove that Vr € R, z² + 6x +8.5 = 0⇒zQ. Hint: you may want to use results that are similar to 2a and 2b. C

Advanced Engineering Mathematics
10th Edition
ISBN:9780470458365
Author:Erwin Kreyszig
Publisher:Erwin Kreyszig
Chapter2: Second-order Linear Odes
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1RQ
icon
Related questions
Question

Pleaseh help me with these question. I am having trouble understanding what to do

Please show all work

Thank you

 

2. For this question, you will prove that the roots of z² + 6x + 8.5 are irrational. In other words, that
Va € R, z² + 6x + 8.5=0=zQ.
You may use, without proof, the quadratic formula. In other words, you may use the fact that for all
real a, b, and c,
-b-√b²-4ac,
-b+√b²-4ac
Vr € R, (ar²+bx+c=0) ^ (b²-4ac > 0) ⇒ (z =
-) V (x=
2a
2a
Please write complete proofs in each subquestion, without referring back to earlier subquestions.
1
(a)
Prove that VI ER, re Q⇒ (r+1) EQ. Hint: go back to the definition of Q, and show
that if a satisfies that definition, then so does (x + 1).
(b)
Prove that Vr € R, z Q⇒ (x + 1) #Q. Hint: can you prove the contrapositive of this
statement?
(c)
Prove that Vr € R, z² + 6x +8.5 = 0⇒xQ. Hint: you may want to use results that
are similar to 2a and 2b.
Transcribed Image Text:2. For this question, you will prove that the roots of z² + 6x + 8.5 are irrational. In other words, that Va € R, z² + 6x + 8.5=0=zQ. You may use, without proof, the quadratic formula. In other words, you may use the fact that for all real a, b, and c, -b-√b²-4ac, -b+√b²-4ac Vr € R, (ar²+bx+c=0) ^ (b²-4ac > 0) ⇒ (z = -) V (x= 2a 2a Please write complete proofs in each subquestion, without referring back to earlier subquestions. 1 (a) Prove that VI ER, re Q⇒ (r+1) EQ. Hint: go back to the definition of Q, and show that if a satisfies that definition, then so does (x + 1). (b) Prove that Vr € R, z Q⇒ (x + 1) #Q. Hint: can you prove the contrapositive of this statement? (c) Prove that Vr € R, z² + 6x +8.5 = 0⇒xQ. Hint: you may want to use results that are similar to 2a and 2b.
Expert Solution
steps

Step by step

Solved in 5 steps with 5 images

Blurred answer
Recommended textbooks for you
Advanced Engineering Mathematics
Advanced Engineering Mathematics
Advanced Math
ISBN:
9780470458365
Author:
Erwin Kreyszig
Publisher:
Wiley, John & Sons, Incorporated
Numerical Methods for Engineers
Numerical Methods for Engineers
Advanced Math
ISBN:
9780073397924
Author:
Steven C. Chapra Dr., Raymond P. Canale
Publisher:
McGraw-Hill Education
Introductory Mathematics for Engineering Applicat…
Introductory Mathematics for Engineering Applicat…
Advanced Math
ISBN:
9781118141809
Author:
Nathan Klingbeil
Publisher:
WILEY
Mathematics For Machine Technology
Mathematics For Machine Technology
Advanced Math
ISBN:
9781337798310
Author:
Peterson, John.
Publisher:
Cengage Learning,
Basic Technical Mathematics
Basic Technical Mathematics
Advanced Math
ISBN:
9780134437705
Author:
Washington
Publisher:
PEARSON
Topology
Topology
Advanced Math
ISBN:
9780134689517
Author:
Munkres, James R.
Publisher:
Pearson,