The expected variable cost per unit is 12.79 but use 13 A proposed project has estimated sale units of 2,500, give or take 2percent. The expected variable cost per unit is $12.79 and the expectedfixed costs are $17,500. Cost estimates are considered accurate withina plus or minus 3 percent range. The depreciation expense is $2,850.The sale price is estimated at $15.40 a unit, give or take 3 percent. Thecompany bases its sensitivity analysis on the expected case scenario.If a sensitivity analysis is conducted using a variable cost estimate of$13, what will be the total annual variable costs?

Step 1: Identify the estimated number of units soldStep 2: Determine the variable cost per unit used…

Answered: A proposed project has estimated sale…

EBK CONTEMPORARY FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT

14th Edition

ISBN:9781337514835

Author:MOYER

Publisher:MOYER

Chapter11: Capital Budgeting And Risk

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 21P

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Assume a project has three variables: life, first cost, and annual cost. Assume there is no salvage value. For each variable there are three possible values as listed below. The firm uses an interest rate of 8 percent to evaluate engineering projects. For each variable, determine which value is "optimistic" and which is "pessimistic". The remaining value is "most likely". Compute each variable's estimated mean (using the "optimistic/most likely/pessimistic" formula) and using those computed mean values, compute the project's expected present value cost. First cost: -$480,000, -$620,000, -$860,000 Annual cost: -$75,000, -$85,000, -$110,000 Life: 8 years, 10 years, 24 years What is Expected Net Present Worth?
Suppose the MARR is 10% with probability 0.25, 12% with probability 0.50, and 15% with probability 0.25; what is the probability that Alternative A is the most economic alternative? Two investment alternatives are being considered. Alternative A requires an initial investment of $15,000 in equipment; annual operating and maintenance costs are anticipated to be normally distributed, with a mean of $5,000 and a standard deviation of $500; the terminal salvage value at the end of the 8-year planning horizon is anticipated to be normally distributed, with a mean of $2,000 and a standard deviation of $800. Alternative B requires endof-year annual expenditures over the planning horizon. The annual expenditure will be normally distributed, with a mean of $8,000 and a standard deviation of $750. Using a MARR of 15%, what is the probability that Alternative A is the most economic alternative?
Suppose the net present values of projects A and B show a distribution as follows. Net Present Value (TL) 750 1000 1250 1500 1750 Project A 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 0.3 Project B 0.15 0.25 0.3 0.1 0.2 a) Compare the projects according to the expected value criteria? b) Compare the projects by standard deviation criteria? c) Evaluate A and B projects according to the coefficient of variation criteria?
A company estimates that an average-risk project has a WACC of 10 percent, a below-average risk project has a WACC of 8 percent, and an above-average risk project has a WACC of 12 percent. Which of the following independent projects should the company accept? Project A has average risk and an IRR = 9 percent. Project B has below-average risk and an IRR = 8.5 percent. Project C has above-average risk and an IRR = 11 percent. None of the above
Project A has expected return of K500,000 while project B has expected return of K100,000. The variances for A and B are K25, 000,000 and K1, 000,000 respectively. a) Compute the coefficient of variation for the two projects b) Which of the two projects is more risky? c) The risky cash flow for project D is K150,000 in perpetuity and the risk adjusted return is 15%. What are the certainty equivalent cash flows when the risk free rate is 10% d) Should project D be accepted if it costs K105,000?
Plot a sensitivity graph for annual worth versus initial cost, annual revenue, and salvage value for the data below. Vary only one parameter at a time, each within the range of -20% to +20%. MARR is 3%/year. Project life is 4 years. Based on your graph, which parameter shows the MOST sensitivity? Initial Cost: $120,000- Annual Revenue: $25,000 - Salvage Value: $35,000 O Cannot be determined O Annual Revenue O Initial Cost O Salvage Value
Suppose the net present values of projects A and B show a distribution as follows. a) Compare the projects by expected value criteria?b) Compare the projects by standard deviation criteria?c) Evaluate A and B projects according to the coefficient of variation criterion?Calculate on paper.
. Given the following information of a three-year IT project of Muscat Solutions LLC. Calculate cost variance (CV), schedule variance (SV), cost performance index (CPI), and schedule performance index (SPI) for the given project. Justify the results. Planned Value, PV = $ 43000 Earned Value, EV = $ 27000 Actual Cost, AC = $ 65000
The estimates for a project appear in the following table: Dear optimistic most likely pessimist Fixed cost($) 250,000 250,000 250,000 Annual profit ($) 20,000 15,000 8,000 Shelf life(years) 30 30 30 Residual value($) 0 00 to. Use the range of values to calculate the heavy average of benefits. b. Using the heavy average, calculate the Equivalent Average Present Value for this project. Use a MARR of 10%. Heavy average annual benefits =$ ; Average Present Value = $ 2 points. To receive credit results have to match submitted procedures. c. Send the calculations made to arrive at the answer through the Spreadsheet icon.
The most likely outcomes for a particular project are estimated as follows: Unit price: Variable cost: Fixed cost: Expected sales: $ 50 $ 30 $ 490,000 48,000 units per year However, you recognize that some of these estimates are subject to error. Suppose each variable turns out to be either 10% higher or 10% lower than the initial estimate. The project will last for 10 years and requires an initial investment of $2.3 million, which will be depreciated straight-line over the project life to a final value of zero. The firm's tax rate is 21%, and the required rate of return is 10%. a. NPV b. NPV a. What is project's NPV in the best-case scenario, that is, assuming all variables take on the best possible value? b. What is project's NPV in the worst-case scenario? Note: For all the requirements, a negative amount should be indicated by a minus sign. Enter your answers in dollars, not in millions. Do not round intermediate calculations. Round your answers to the nearest dollar amount. 4
How do I determine which is the correct answer for this problem? A company estimates that an average-risk project has a WACC of 10 percent, a below-average-risk project has a WACC of 8 percent, and an above-average-risk project has a WACC of 12 percent. Which of the following independent projects should the company accept? a. Project A has average risk and an IRR = 9 percent. b. Project B has below-average risk and an IRR = 8.5 percent. c. Project C has above-average risk and an IRR = 11 percent. d. All of the projects above should be accepted. e. None of the projects above should be accepted. Please answer fast I give you upvote.
8. Modified Internal rate of return (MIRR) The IRR evaluation method assumes that cash flows from the project are reinvested at the same rate equal to the IRR. However, in reality the reinvested cash flows may not necessarily generate a return equal to the IRR. Thus, the modified IRR approach makes a more reasonable assumption other than the project's IRR. Consider the following situation: Green Caterpillar Garden Supplies Inc. is analyzing a project that requires an initial investment of $400,000. The project's expected cash flows are: Year Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Cash Flow $325,000 -200,000 425,000 475,000

SEE MORE QUESTIONS

Recommended textbooks for you

EBK CONTEMPORARY FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT

Finance

ISBN:

9781337514835

Author:

MOYER

Publisher:

CENGAGE LEARNING - CONSIGNMENT

Essentials of Business Analytics (MindTap Course …

Statistics

ISBN:

9781305627734

Author:

Jeffrey D. Camm, James J. Cochran, Michael J. Fry, Jeffrey W. Ohlmann, David R. Anderson

Publisher:

Cengage Learning

EBK CONTEMPORARY FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT

Finance

ISBN:

9781337514835

Author:

MOYER

Publisher:

CENGAGE LEARNING - CONSIGNMENT

Essentials of Business Analytics (MindTap Course …

Statistics

ISBN:

9781305627734

Author:

Jeffrey D. Camm, James J. Cochran, Michael J. Fry, Jeffrey W. Ohlmann, David R. Anderson

Publisher:

Cengage Learning

SEE MORE TEXTBOOKS