A number of states have a law that requires people to wear a helmet when riding a bicycle.This law is in place because wearing a helmet reduces the likelihood of head and brain injury for cyclists who get into accidents. Recently research shows that wearing a helmet makes a cyclist take more risks when riding a bicycle. Some have stated that this research means that the likelihood of head and brain injuries would decrease if the helmet law is abolished. Which of the following is the best statement of the flaw in the above argument? Helmets protect cyclist from head and brain injuries More risk-taking while protected does not mean that removing the requirement for protection would lead to greater safety. Not wearing a helmet may result in cyclists wearing taking fewer risks when riding a bicycle
A number of states have a law that requires people to wear a helmet when riding a bicycle.This law is in place because wearing a helmet reduces the likelihood of head and brain injury for cyclists who get into accidents. Recently research shows that wearing a helmet makes a cyclist take more risks when riding a bicycle. Some have stated that this research means that the likelihood of head and brain injuries would decrease if the helmet law is abolished.
Which of the following is the best statement of the flaw in the above argument?
Helmets protect cyclist from head and brain injuries
More risk-taking while protected does not mean that removing the requirement for protection would lead to greater safety.
Not wearing a helmet may result in cyclists wearing taking fewer risks when riding a bicycle
Trending now
This is a popular solution!
Step by step
Solved in 2 steps
