A neoclassical economist and a Keynesian economist are studying the economy of Vineland. It appears that Vineland is beginning to experience a mild recession with a decrease in aggregate demand. Which of these two economists would likely advocate that the government of Vineland take active measures to reverse this decline in aggregate demand? Why?

A neoclassical economist and a Keynesian economist are studying the economy of Vineland. It appears that Vineland is beginning to experience a mild recession with a decrease in aggregate demand. Which of these two economists would likely advocate that the government of Vineland take active measures to reverse this decline in aggregate demand? Why?

Economics:

10th Edition

ISBN:9781285859460

Author:BOYES, William

Publisher:BOYES, William

Chapter15: Macroeconomic Viewpoints: New Keynesian, Monetarist, And New Classical

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 5E

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

In your view, is the economy currently operating in the Keynesian, intermediate or neoclassical portion of the economy's aggregate supply curve?
What is the best approach to managing the economy, supply-side or demand-side economics? There are two schools of thought on how to managing the economy. The first is demand-side economics which also the Keynesian approach. This approach maintains that the demand for products and services drives the economy as such economic policies should focus on the aggregate demand curve. The other approach is called supply-side economics or more popularly referred to as Reaganomics. In this trickle-down approach, it is postulated that the production of goods and services is what drives the economy with the focus on the aggregate supply curve. Both fiscal and monetary policies have the potential to stimulate change in either the aggregated demand or the aggregate supply curves. In your initial post defend which approach should be used to (ensure to include in your subject line, which approach you are defending): Restore the economy that is in a recession. Identify the challenges that may be…
According to a neoclassical perspective, in the long run, a surge in aggregate demand will most likely result in A) A rise in the level of output. B) An increase in the aggregate price level. C) A decline in the level of output D) Downward pressure on the price level.
What is meant by dynamic inconsistency? Give at least two examples of policies that are dynamically inconsistent.
The graph below is associated with a hypothetical country. Consider an increase in aggregate demand (AD). Specifically, aggregate demand shifts to the right from AD1AD1 to AD2AD2, causing the quantity of output demanded to rise at each price level. For instance, at a price level of 140, output is now $400 billion, where initially it was $300 billion. Fill in the missing values in the table by selecting the change in each scenario required to increase aggregate demand. Change required to increase AD Expected rate of return on investment. (decrease/increase) Incomes in other countries (decrease/increase) Consumer expectations about future profitability. (improve/worsen) Government spending (increase/decrease)
Compare and contrast the use of government spending changes versus tax changes as a means of influencing the course of the economy. Is one or the other preferable in specific situations? What are the short-run and long-run implications? What solutions do you recommend? (Think beyond the scope of the video and keep it to economical thought.) What would a Neoclassical economist say about your solutions? What would a Keynesian economist say about your solutions? Apply economic theories and models to support your response
Which is a valid interpretation of Keynes' law? Focusing exclusively on supply side economics will make the economy grow the fastest. Each time goods are produced, it represents income for someone. Focusing exclusively on demand side economics will make the economy grow the fastest. A given value of supply creates an equal value of demand somewhere in the economy. Demand creates its own supply. In the long run, supply and demand grow at the same rate.
Legislation proposes that the government should use macroeconomic policy to achieve an unemployment rate of zero percent, by increasing aggregate demand for as much and as long as necessary to accomplish this goal. From a neoclassical perspective, how will this policy affect output and the price level in the short run and in the long run? Sketch an aggregate demand/aggregate supply diagram to illustrate your answer.
Figure 1: Hayek’s (Classical) AD-AS Model Economics Online. (n.d.). Aggregate Demand. Retrieved from http://economicsonline.co.uk/Managing_the_economy/Aggregate_demand.html Hayek says that markets will heal themselves and that government should not intervene. How does the AD-AS model reflect Hayek’s idea that governments cannot increase real GDP beyond the level that the free market economy is able to produce? Do you believe that the Hayek’s classical AD-AS model explain the factors that cause changes (shifts) in AS realistically? Why or why not? Figure 2: Keynes’s AD-AS Model Economics Online. (n.d.). Aggregate supply. Retrieved from http://www.economicsonline.co.uk/Managing_the_economy/Aggregate+supply.html 2.1. In Figure 2 above, what are the factors that may cause the aggregate demand to shift from AD to AD1? What is the difference between demand pull inflation, cost push inflation and recession? 2.2. In macroeconomics, the immediate short run is known as a length…
Keynesian economics predicts that if government policy makers deem current equilibrium real Gross Domestic Product (GDP) to be "too low," then an appropriate policy action would be to do nothing, because the economy is self-adjusting. raise government spending, thereby increasing aggregate demand and pushing up real Gross Domestic Product (GDP) with little or no inflationary consequences. increase taxes, thereby causing aggregate demand to increase and inducing a rise in real Gross Domestic Product (GDP) with little or no inflationary consequences. reduce the money stock, thereby causing aggregate demand to decrease and inducing a rise in fall in the price level that generates an increase in total planned expenditures.
Compare and contrast the classical and Keynesian views of aggregate demand and aggregate supply.
Between 2007 and 2009, the United States experienced a severe financial crisis and economic downturn commonly known as the Great Recession. Starting in 2006, housing values fell 30%, causing losses in mortgage-backed securities for families and financial institutions. The recession was marked by a drop in aggregate demand that caused a decline in GDP and an increase in unemployment. Attached is an example of an aggregate demand and aggregate supply (AD/AS) model that illustrates the general trends of the U.S. economy during the Great Recession. How did the AD/AS equilibrium change over time? Support your claims by referring to your AD/AS model. Select an economic factor (GDP, unemployment, price level) and explain what impact any shifts in AD or AS (or both) had on your chosen factor. Please tailor the answer according the AD/AS model in layman's terms