A member in a braced frame supports an axial compressive load and end moments that causes bending about both axes of the member. Kx = Ky = 1.0. Is W14×82 adequate? 140 k 16' Mux Muy M = 150 ft-k = = 150 ft-k M = 75 ft-k = ux Muy Figure 4 = 75 ft-k =

Structural Analysis
6th Edition
ISBN:9781337630931
Author:KASSIMALI, Aslam.
Publisher:KASSIMALI, Aslam.
Chapter2: Loads On Structures
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1P
icon
Related questions
Question
100%
## Structural Analysis of a Braced Frame Member under Combined Loading 

**Problem Statement:**
A member in a braced frame supports an axial compressive load and end moments that cause bending about both axes of the member. The effective length factors for both axes are given as \( K_x = K_y = 1.0 \). The task is to determine whether a W14×82 structural shape (W-shape) is adequate for this scenario.

### Load and Moment Details:

- **Axial Compressive Load (\( P \))**: 140 kips (k)
- **End Moments at the Upper End**:
  - About X-axis (\( M_{ux} \)): 150 ft-kips
  - About Y-axis (\( M_{uy} \)): 150 ft-kips
- **End Moments at the Bottom End**:
  - About X-axis (\( M_{lx} \)): 75 ft-kips
  - About Y-axis (\( M_{ly} \)): 75 ft-kips
- **Member Length**: 16 feet (ft)

### Diagram Illustration:

**Figure 4**: This figure presents a simplified schematic of the structural member under combined loading. It features:
- An axial compressive load \( P = 140 \) k acting downward.
- The upper end moments \( M_{ux} = 150 \) ft-k and \( M_{uy} = 150 \) ft-k acting in opposite directions (opposite ends of the member around their respective axes).
- The lower end moments \( M_{lx} = 75 \) ft-k and \( M_{ly} = 75 \) ft-k, also acting in opposite directions.
- A notation indicating the member height of 16' between the upper and lower ends.

### Key Factors:
1. **Kx and Ky Values**: The effective length factors for both the X-axis and Y-axis are equal to 1. This implies there is no reduction or increase in the effective length for buckling analysis.
2. **Member Selection**: The shape being evaluated for adequacy is W14×82. 

### Evaluation:
The adequacy of a structural member considering these loads and moments would typically involve ensuring that the combined stress due to axial load and bending moments does not exceed the allowable limits based on material strength and member properties. This is done using structural design principles and calculations (e.g., LRFD
Transcribed Image Text:## Structural Analysis of a Braced Frame Member under Combined Loading **Problem Statement:** A member in a braced frame supports an axial compressive load and end moments that cause bending about both axes of the member. The effective length factors for both axes are given as \( K_x = K_y = 1.0 \). The task is to determine whether a W14×82 structural shape (W-shape) is adequate for this scenario. ### Load and Moment Details: - **Axial Compressive Load (\( P \))**: 140 kips (k) - **End Moments at the Upper End**: - About X-axis (\( M_{ux} \)): 150 ft-kips - About Y-axis (\( M_{uy} \)): 150 ft-kips - **End Moments at the Bottom End**: - About X-axis (\( M_{lx} \)): 75 ft-kips - About Y-axis (\( M_{ly} \)): 75 ft-kips - **Member Length**: 16 feet (ft) ### Diagram Illustration: **Figure 4**: This figure presents a simplified schematic of the structural member under combined loading. It features: - An axial compressive load \( P = 140 \) k acting downward. - The upper end moments \( M_{ux} = 150 \) ft-k and \( M_{uy} = 150 \) ft-k acting in opposite directions (opposite ends of the member around their respective axes). - The lower end moments \( M_{lx} = 75 \) ft-k and \( M_{ly} = 75 \) ft-k, also acting in opposite directions. - A notation indicating the member height of 16' between the upper and lower ends. ### Key Factors: 1. **Kx and Ky Values**: The effective length factors for both the X-axis and Y-axis are equal to 1. This implies there is no reduction or increase in the effective length for buckling analysis. 2. **Member Selection**: The shape being evaluated for adequacy is W14×82. ### Evaluation: The adequacy of a structural member considering these loads and moments would typically involve ensuring that the combined stress due to axial load and bending moments does not exceed the allowable limits based on material strength and member properties. This is done using structural design principles and calculations (e.g., LRFD
Expert Solution
trending now

Trending now

This is a popular solution!

steps

Step by step

Solved in 4 steps with 8 images

Blurred answer
Knowledge Booster
Compression members
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, civil-engineering and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.
Recommended textbooks for you
Structural Analysis
Structural Analysis
Civil Engineering
ISBN:
9781337630931
Author:
KASSIMALI, Aslam.
Publisher:
Cengage,
Structural Analysis (10th Edition)
Structural Analysis (10th Edition)
Civil Engineering
ISBN:
9780134610672
Author:
Russell C. Hibbeler
Publisher:
PEARSON
Principles of Foundation Engineering (MindTap Cou…
Principles of Foundation Engineering (MindTap Cou…
Civil Engineering
ISBN:
9781337705028
Author:
Braja M. Das, Nagaratnam Sivakugan
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Fundamentals of Structural Analysis
Fundamentals of Structural Analysis
Civil Engineering
ISBN:
9780073398006
Author:
Kenneth M. Leet Emeritus, Chia-Ming Uang, Joel Lanning
Publisher:
McGraw-Hill Education
Sustainable Energy
Sustainable Energy
Civil Engineering
ISBN:
9781337551663
Author:
DUNLAP, Richard A.
Publisher:
Cengage,
Traffic and Highway Engineering
Traffic and Highway Engineering
Civil Engineering
ISBN:
9781305156241
Author:
Garber, Nicholas J.
Publisher:
Cengage Learning