A manufacturing company is considering a capacity expansion investment at the cost of $241,797 with no salvage value. The expansion would enable the company to produce up to 27,876 parts per year and the useful life of the additional capacity is seven years. Each part would generate $3.65 net profit and annual operating and maintenance costs are estimated at $28.137 per year. The market demand for the parts is unlimited, all parts produced will be sold. The MARR of the firm is 10%. The minimum annual production rate to make this investment justifiable is: Enter your answer in this form: 12345.67

A manufacturing company is considering a capacity expansion investment at the cost of $241,797 with no salvage value. The expansion would enable the company to produce up to 27,876 parts per year and the useful life of the additional capacity is seven years. Each part would generate $3.65 net profit and annual operating and maintenance costs are estimated at $28.137 per year. The market demand for the parts is unlimited, all parts produced will be sold. The MARR of the firm is 10%. The minimum annual production rate to make this investment justifiable is: Enter your answer in this form: 12345.67

ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS

14th Edition

ISBN:9780190931919

Author:NEWNAN

Publisher:NEWNAN

Chapter1: Making Economics Decisions

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1QTC

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Your company is considering purchasing a new CNC machining center. The net benefits in the first year will be $50,000, increasing at a rate of $4,000 per year for the subsequent nine years (so the benefits are $50,000, $54,000, $58,000, etc.). You think the company can get a salvage value of $18,000 at the end of its 10-year useful life. If the MARR is 8%, how much can the company justify spending on the CNC machining center? Solve by present worth analysis.
Consider a proposal to enhance production of tortillas en a taqueria. The new machine is estimated to cost $20 million and will incur an additional $1 million per year in maintenance costs. The machine will produce annual savings of $7 million each year. The Minimum acceptable rate of return (MARR) is 10% per year, and the study period is five years at which time the machine will be obsolete (worthless). What is the maximum (minimum) percentage of maintenance cost can change that reverse your decision? (write upto 4 decimals.)
A manufacturing engineer is considering whether to repair or replace a broken machine. The first alternative (Alternative “A”) is to repair the machine with an initial cost of $15,000, an annual maintenance of $700 per year, with no salvage value at the end of its five-year useful life. The second alternative (Alternative “B”) is to replace the machine for $30,000. The maintenance cost starts in the second year at $200 and increases $200 per year in all subsequent years. There is an anticipated salvage value of $5,000 at the end of 20 years. Assuming interest rate is 6% and an analysis period of 20 years, what would be the preferable alternative ?
A 50-kilowatt gas turbine has an investment cost of $35,000. It costs another $15,000 for shipping, insurance, site preparation, fuel lines, and fuel storage tanks. The operation and maintenance expense for this turbine is $500 per year. Additionally, the hourly fuel expense for running the turbine is $7.00 per hour, and the turbine is expected to operate 3,500 hours each year. The cost of dismantling and disposing of the turbine at the end of its 6-year life is $9,000. a. If the MARR is 16% per year, what is the annual equivalent life-cycle cost of the gas turbine? b. What percent of annual life-cycle cost is related to fuel? Click the icon to view the interest and annuity table for discrete compounding when the MARR is 16% per year. a. The annual equivalent life-cycle cost of the gas turbine is $ (Round to the nearest dollar.)
You purchase equipment for $13,000,000 To operate the equipment, you incur expenses of $3,900,000 per year The equipment generates revenue of $8,400,000 per year 5. a) What is the non-discounted (i 0% ) payback period? b) What is the payback period at MARR = 15%? %3D %3D
To compare the machines on the basis of present worth analysis, the present worth values to use are: (Include answer, diagram, procedure, and result) O PWx = $31,139, PWy = $43.066 O PWX =$31,139, PWy= $37,461 O PWx= $54,533, PWy = $43,066 O PWx = $54,533. PWy = $37,461
Super Tennis Co is in the business of designing and manufacturing running shoes for long distance runners. They are considering a $500 million upgrade to their production line for the iPhone/iPad/ iWatch connected shoe that has Bluetooth connectivity. The potential cash flow is estimated at net revenues of $460 million per year for four years. Recently, they were advised of potential patent infringement and to eliminate this problem they are considering buying a license. YezzCo will sell a license that is good for four years of exclusive use of the patent and associated intellectual property. Super Tennis Co uses a corporate MARR of 14% and their risk-free alternatives are 6%. The VP of Engineering at Super Tennis Co estimates market volatility in demand is 40%. The VP of Marketing estimates market volatility in demand at 35%. 1.Since the VPAc€?cs trust you, they asked you to figure out the most they should pay for a license from YezzCo. 2. Super Tennis Co is known to be liberal in…
A factory manager is considering the purchase of one of the following two production equipment. Cash flow estimates for equipment A are in year-zero dollars while those of equipment B are in actual dollars. Equipment A (year-zero $) Initial investment Net annual revenue $9,800 $3,000 Market value at end of useful life Useful life, years $0 12 Equipment B (actual $) $11,200 $4,000 $0 12 The manager uses a market interest rate of 12% per year. If inflation rate is expected to average 7.69% per year over the next several years, determine the PW of each equipment. 1. The PW of Equipment A is A. $18,355 B. $13,176 ○ C. $12,800 ○ D. $8,783 2. The PW of Equipment B is ○ A. $15,200 B. $26,340 ○ C. $13,577 OD. $19,435
Your company is planning to expand by taking over the next-door manufacturing facility. You are faced with a buy-versus-lease option. The purchase price is $1.5 million, while you can lease it for $270,000 per year for 10 years. If purchased, it can be sold for 40% of its original price at the end of its 10 years life. In either case the annual income is estimated to be $1.2 million and the annual operating cost would be $300,000. Your company pays 38% combined income tax and the after-tax minimum attractive rate of return (MARR) is 10%. Assuming lease payments are due at the end of the year and using a straight-line depreciation over the 10 years life with full first year depreciation, determine: a. The EUAW = EUAB-EUAC for each option with MARR = 10%. Should the facility be purchased or leased? b. The break-even rate of return of purchase versus lease, i.e. ROR at which (EUAB – EUAC) purchase = (EUAB - EUAC) lease
Vermonto Ltd is putting together a tender for a one-off contract using relevant costing principles. The job requires 50m2 of Material X Vermonto has established the following information regarding material X: Material X Amount held 40m2 Original cost £25 per m2 Net realisable value £28 per m2 Current purchase price £30 per m2 Material X is no longer used by Vermonto for its ongoing operations and any existing inventories will be sold if not used. What is the relevant cost for material X for the purpose of pricing the contract?
Machine A costs Q10,000.00, with a recovery value of Q4,000.00 at the end of 5 years and has annual expenses ofoperation of Q5,000.00 during the first three years and Q6,000.00 during the last 2. Machine B costsQ14,000.00, with a recovery value of Q3,000.00 at the end of 10 years. Its operating expenses amount to Q3,500.00annually during the 5 years and Q4,500.00 during the last 5. The increases in operating expenses are theexpected for maintenance, repair and loss of efficiency due to use. The minimum required rate of returnis 15%a) Make the graph and determine the annual cost and make the respective comparison between the two machines.b) Select the most feasible machine.c) Determine the future worth in year 10 for both machines.d) Determine the quarterly value during the 10 years for both machines.e) As an Engineer you are asked to determine an action plan, define objectives, activities to overcome the bestalternative and estimating a new NPV, which exceeds 15% the best optionf)…
Question 3 Consider a proposal to enhance production of tortillas en a taqueria. The new machine is estimated to cost $33 million and will incur an additional $1.5 million per year in maintenance costs. The machine will produce annual savings of $4.5 million each year. The Minimum acceptable rate of return (MARR) is 8.5% per year, and the study period is five years at which time the machine will be obsolete (worthless). What is the maximum (minimum) percentage of initial investmet change that reverse your decision?