Homework Help is Here – Start Your Trial Now!
Science
Advanced Physics
A) If the third line of charge had a linear charge density of) +200.625 μC/m, what is the flux through a gaussian cylinder that is 8.000 cm long and encloses all three lines? B) If was originally unknown, but we did know the flux through the cylinder mentioned in part A was -361582 (N*m^2)/C, what must be the value of ? C) Would it be easy to use Gauss' Law to find the magnitude of the E-field on the surface of the cylinder? If so, calculate it for me. If not, explain why we should not use Gauss' Law in this case.

A) If the third line of charge had a linear charge density of) +200.625 μC/m, what is the flux through a gaussian cylinder that is 8.000 cm long and encloses all three lines? B) If was originally unknown, but we did know the flux through the cylinder mentioned in part A was -361582 (N*m^2)/C, what must be the value of ? C) Would it be easy to use Gauss' Law to find the magnitude of the E-field on the surface of the cylinder? If so, calculate it for me. If not, explain why we should not use Gauss' Law in this case.

icon
Related questions
Question
………………….. ………………….. ………………….. …………………..
S Three infinite lines of charge are parallel to one another, and from the top view form an equilateral triangle (see picture below). The first line of charge has a linear charge density of +135.000μC/m and the second line of charge has a linear charge density of2=-225.000μC/m. Answer the following [hint: use all six sig-figs for the linear charge densities, and use 8.85 x 10^-12]: -A) If the third line of charge had a linear charge density of +200.625C/m, what is the flux through a gaussian cylinder that is 8.000 cm long and encloses all three lines? B) Ifwas originally unknown, but we did know the flux through the cylinder mentioned in part A was -361582 (N*m^2)/C, what must be the value of ? C) Would it be easy to use Gauss' Law to find the magnitude of the E-field on the surface of the cylinder? If so, calculate it for me. If not, explain why we should not use Gauss' Law in this case. Top view. Side view: JD вст 10000
Transcribed Image Text:S Three infinite lines of charge are parallel to one another, and from the top view form an equilateral triangle (see picture below). The first line of charge has a linear charge density of +135.000μC/m and the second line of charge has a linear charge density of2=-225.000μC/m. Answer the following [hint: use all six sig-figs for the linear charge densities, and use 8.85 x 10^-12]: -A) If the third line of charge had a linear charge density of +200.625C/m, what is the flux through a gaussian cylinder that is 8.000 cm long and encloses all three lines? B) Ifwas originally unknown, but we did know the flux through the cylinder mentioned in part A was -361582 (N*m^2)/C, what must be the value of ? C) Would it be easy to use Gauss' Law to find the magnitude of the E-field on the surface of the cylinder? If so, calculate it for me. If not, explain why we should not use Gauss' Law in this case. Top view. Side view: JD вст 10000
Expert Solution
steps

Step by step

Solved in 3 steps

SEE SOLUTIONCheck out a sample Q&A here
Blurred answer