A dietician read in a survey that 60.41% of adults in the U.S. do not eat breakfast at least 3 days a week. She believes that the proportion that skip breakfast 3 days a week is different than 0.6041. To verify her claim, she selects a random sample of 77 adults and asks them how many days a week they skip breakfast. 52 of them report that they skip breakfast at least 3 days a week. Test her claim at αα = 0.10. The correct hypotheses would be: H0:p≤0.6041H0:p≤0.6041 HA:p>0.6041HA:p>0.6041 (claim) H0:p≥0.6041H0:p≥0.6041 HA:p<0.6041HA:p<0.6041 (claim) H0:p=0.6041H0:p=0.6041 HA:p≠0.6041HA:p≠0.6041 (claim) Since the level of significance is 0.10 the critical value is 1.645 and -1.645 The test statistic is: (round to 3 places) The p-value is: (round to 3 places) The decision can be made to: reject H0H0 do not reject H0H0 The final conclusion is that: There is enough evidence to reject the claim that the proportion that skip breakfast 3 days a week is different than 0.6041. There is not enough evidence to reject the claim that the proportion that skip breakfast 3 days a week is different than 0.6041. There is enough evidence to support the claim that the proportion that skip breakfast 3 days a week is different than 0.6041. There is not enough evidence to support the claim that the proportion that skip breakfast 3 days a week is different than 0.6041.
A dietician read in a survey that 60.41% of adults in the U.S. do not eat breakfast at least 3 days a week. She believes that the proportion that skip breakfast 3 days a week is different than 0.6041. To verify her claim, she selects a random sample of 77 adults and asks them how many days a week they skip breakfast. 52 of them report that they skip breakfast at least 3 days a week. Test her claim at αα = 0.10. The correct hypotheses would be: H0:p≤0.6041H0:p≤0.6041 HA:p>0.6041HA:p>0.6041 (claim) H0:p≥0.6041H0:p≥0.6041 HA:p<0.6041HA:p<0.6041 (claim) H0:p=0.6041H0:p=0.6041 HA:p≠0.6041HA:p≠0.6041 (claim) Since the level of significance is 0.10 the critical value is 1.645 and -1.645 The test statistic is: (round to 3 places) The p-value is: (round to 3 places) The decision can be made to: reject H0H0 do not reject H0H0 The final conclusion is that: There is enough evidence to reject the claim that the proportion that skip breakfast 3 days a week is different than 0.6041. There is not enough evidence to reject the claim that the proportion that skip breakfast 3 days a week is different than 0.6041. There is enough evidence to support the claim that the proportion that skip breakfast 3 days a week is different than 0.6041. There is not enough evidence to support the claim that the proportion that skip breakfast 3 days a week is different than 0.6041.
MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
6th Edition
ISBN:9781119256830
Author:Amos Gilat
Publisher:Amos Gilat
Chapter1: Starting With Matlab
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1P
Related questions
Topic Video
Question
100%
A dietician read in a survey that 60.41% of adults in the U.S. do not eat breakfast at least 3 days a week. She believes that the proportion that skip breakfast 3 days a week is different than 0.6041. To verify her claim, she selects a random sample of 77 adults and asks them how many days a week they skip breakfast. 52 of them report that they skip breakfast at least 3 days a week. Test her claim at αα = 0.10.
The correct hypotheses would be:
- H0:p≤0.6041H0:p≤0.6041
HA:p>0.6041HA:p>0.6041 (claim) - H0:p≥0.6041H0:p≥0.6041
HA:p<0.6041HA:p<0.6041 (claim) - H0:p=0.6041H0:p=0.6041
HA:p≠0.6041HA:p≠0.6041 (claim)
Since the level of significance is 0.10 the critical value is 1.645 and -1.645
The test statistic is: (round to 3 places)
The p-value is: (round to 3 places)
The decision can be made to:
- reject H0H0
- do not reject H0H0
The final conclusion is that:
- There is enough evidence to reject the claim that the proportion that skip breakfast 3 days a week is different than 0.6041.
- There is not enough evidence to reject the claim that the proportion that skip breakfast 3 days a week is different than 0.6041.
- There is enough evidence to support the claim that the proportion that skip breakfast 3 days a week is different than 0.6041.
- There is not enough evidence to support the claim that the proportion that skip breakfast 3 days a week is different than 0.6041.
Expert Solution
This question has been solved!
Explore an expertly crafted, step-by-step solution for a thorough understanding of key concepts.
This is a popular solution!
Trending now
This is a popular solution!
Step by step
Solved in 2 steps with 4 images
Knowledge Booster
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, statistics and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.Recommended textbooks for you
MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
Statistics
ISBN:
9781119256830
Author:
Amos Gilat
Publisher:
John Wiley & Sons Inc
Probability and Statistics for Engineering and th…
Statistics
ISBN:
9781305251809
Author:
Jay L. Devore
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Statistics for The Behavioral Sciences (MindTap C…
Statistics
ISBN:
9781305504912
Author:
Frederick J Gravetter, Larry B. Wallnau
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
Statistics
ISBN:
9781119256830
Author:
Amos Gilat
Publisher:
John Wiley & Sons Inc
Probability and Statistics for Engineering and th…
Statistics
ISBN:
9781305251809
Author:
Jay L. Devore
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Statistics for The Behavioral Sciences (MindTap C…
Statistics
ISBN:
9781305504912
Author:
Frederick J Gravetter, Larry B. Wallnau
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Elementary Statistics: Picturing the World (7th E…
Statistics
ISBN:
9780134683416
Author:
Ron Larson, Betsy Farber
Publisher:
PEARSON
The Basic Practice of Statistics
Statistics
ISBN:
9781319042578
Author:
David S. Moore, William I. Notz, Michael A. Fligner
Publisher:
W. H. Freeman
Introduction to the Practice of Statistics
Statistics
ISBN:
9781319013387
Author:
David S. Moore, George P. McCabe, Bruce A. Craig
Publisher:
W. H. Freeman