A CONFERENCE REVIEW database system is a system where researchers submit their research papers for considerations. Reviews by reviewers are recorded for use in the paper selection process. The database system caters primarily to reviewers who record answers to evaluation question for each paper they review and make recommendations regarding whether to accept or reject the paper. The data requirements are summarized as follows: Authors of papers are uniquely identified by e-mail id. First and last name are also recorded. • Each paper is assigned a unique identifier by the system and is described by a title, abstract, and the name of the electronic file containing the paper. • A paper may have multiple authors, but one of the authors is designated as the contact author. • Reviewers of papers are uniquely identified by e-mail address. Each reviewer's first name, last name, phone number, affiliation, and topics of interest are also recorded. • Each paper is assigned between two and four reviewers. A reviewer rates each paper assigned to him or her on a scale of 1 to 10 in four categories: technical merit, readability, originality, and relevance to the conference. Finally, each reviewer provides an overall recommendation regarding each paper. • Each review contains two types of written comments: one to be seen by the review committee only and overall recommendation regarding each paper.

Database System Concepts
7th Edition
ISBN:9780078022159
Author:Abraham Silberschatz Professor, Henry F. Korth, S. Sudarshan
Publisher:Abraham Silberschatz Professor, Henry F. Korth, S. Sudarshan
Chapter1: Introduction
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1PE
icon
Related questions
Question

Subject: Database
Question: Draw an ERD based on the given info

A CONFERENCE REVIEW database system is a system where researchers
submit their research papers for considerations. Reviews by reviewers are
recorded for use in the paper selection process. The database system caters
primarily to reviewers who record answers to evaluation question for each paper
they review and make recommendations regarding whether to accept or reject the
paper. The data requirements are summarized as follows:
Authors of papers are uniquely identified by e-mail id. First and last name are
also recorded.
Each paper is assigned a unique identifier by the system and is described by a
title, abstract, and the name of the electronic file containing the paper.
A paper may have multiple authors, but one of the authors is designated as the
contact author.
• Reviewers of papers are uniquely identified by e-mail address. Each
reviewer's first name, last name, phone number, affiliation, and topics of
interest are also recorded.
Each paper is assigned between two and four reviewers. A reviewer rates each
paper assigned to him or her on a scale of 1 to 10 in four categories: technical
merit, readability, originality, and relevance to the conference. Finally, each
reviewer provides an overall recommendation regarding each paper.
Each review contains two types of written comments: one to be seen by the
review committee only and overall recommendation regarding each paper.
Transcribed Image Text:A CONFERENCE REVIEW database system is a system where researchers submit their research papers for considerations. Reviews by reviewers are recorded for use in the paper selection process. The database system caters primarily to reviewers who record answers to evaluation question for each paper they review and make recommendations regarding whether to accept or reject the paper. The data requirements are summarized as follows: Authors of papers are uniquely identified by e-mail id. First and last name are also recorded. Each paper is assigned a unique identifier by the system and is described by a title, abstract, and the name of the electronic file containing the paper. A paper may have multiple authors, but one of the authors is designated as the contact author. • Reviewers of papers are uniquely identified by e-mail address. Each reviewer's first name, last name, phone number, affiliation, and topics of interest are also recorded. Each paper is assigned between two and four reviewers. A reviewer rates each paper assigned to him or her on a scale of 1 to 10 in four categories: technical merit, readability, originality, and relevance to the conference. Finally, each reviewer provides an overall recommendation regarding each paper. Each review contains two types of written comments: one to be seen by the review committee only and overall recommendation regarding each paper.
Expert Solution
trending now

Trending now

This is a popular solution!

steps

Step by step

Solved in 2 steps with 1 images

Blurred answer
Knowledge Booster
Research
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, computer-science and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.
Similar questions
  • SEE MORE QUESTIONS
Recommended textbooks for you
Database System Concepts
Database System Concepts
Computer Science
ISBN:
9780078022159
Author:
Abraham Silberschatz Professor, Henry F. Korth, S. Sudarshan
Publisher:
McGraw-Hill Education
Starting Out with Python (4th Edition)
Starting Out with Python (4th Edition)
Computer Science
ISBN:
9780134444321
Author:
Tony Gaddis
Publisher:
PEARSON
Digital Fundamentals (11th Edition)
Digital Fundamentals (11th Edition)
Computer Science
ISBN:
9780132737968
Author:
Thomas L. Floyd
Publisher:
PEARSON
C How to Program (8th Edition)
C How to Program (8th Edition)
Computer Science
ISBN:
9780133976892
Author:
Paul J. Deitel, Harvey Deitel
Publisher:
PEARSON
Database Systems: Design, Implementation, & Manag…
Database Systems: Design, Implementation, & Manag…
Computer Science
ISBN:
9781337627900
Author:
Carlos Coronel, Steven Morris
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Programmable Logic Controllers
Programmable Logic Controllers
Computer Science
ISBN:
9780073373843
Author:
Frank D. Petruzella
Publisher:
McGraw-Hill Education